Federal Solutions to School Fiscal Crises

Abstract

Applying a Multiple Streams framework, the article documents the development and ultimate undoing of what became known as the national sales tax plan for education. The authors identify four factors that coalesced to lead the Nixon administration to propose replacing local property taxes with a federal value-added tax to finance K-12 education. They further delineate key supporters and opponents, along with their arguments for and against the plan, finding that intergovernmental tension between administration officials and state governors, opposition on Capitol Hill, public opinion, a supreme court ruling, and the Watergate scandal came together to unravel the plan before it could be formally introduced in Congress. Finally, the authors discuss what this case tells us about the complexity federalism brings to public school finance.

Keywords

education politics federalism school finance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1973). Financing schools and property tax relief—a state responsibility (ACIR Publication No. A-40). Washington, DC: Author.

Bogdan

R. C.

Biklen

S. K.

(1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Civil rights: Desegregation yes, integration no (1970, April 6). Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,943947,00.html

Cohen-Vogel

Hunt

(2007). Governing quality in teacher education: Deconstructing federal text and talk. American Journal of Education, 114, 137-163.

Cohen-Vogel

McLendon

(2009). New approaches to understanding federal involvement in education. In Plank

Sykes

Schneider

(Eds.), Handbook of education policy research. A Handbook for the American Educational Research Association (pp. 735-748). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

DeBray-Pelot

(2007). School choice and educational privatization initiatives in the 106th and 107th Congresses: An analysis of policy formation and political ideologies. TeachersCollege Record, 109, 927-972.

Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Digest of Education Statistics. (2009). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/ch_4.asp

Fetterman

D. M.

(1989). Ethnography step by step. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

10.

Graham

(1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Little Brown.

11.

Graham

Zelikow

(1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

12.

Kaestle

C. R.

(2001). Federal aid to education since World War II: Purposes and politics. In Jennings

(Ed.), The future of the federal role in elementary and secondary education (pp. 13-34). Washington, DC: Center for Education Reform.

13.

Kingdon

J. W.

(1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

14.

Kingdon

J. W.

(1994). Agendas, ideas, and policy change. In Dodd

Jillson

(Eds.), New perspectives on American politics (pp. 215-299). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

15.

Kingdon

J. W.

(1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

16.

Laver

M. J.

Benoit

Garry

(2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97, 311-331.

17.

Laver

M. J.

Garry

(2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 619-634.

18.

Lindholm

R. W.

(1970). Value-added tax and other tax reforms. Journal of Economic Literature, 8, 1178-1189.

19.

McDermott

(2005). In MINT condition? The politics of alternative certification and pay incentives for teachers in Massachusetts. Educational Policy, 19, 44-62.

20.

McGuire

T. J.

Papke

L. E.

(2008). Local funding of schools: The property tax and its alternatives. In Ladd

Fiske

(Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 357-372). New York, NY: Routledge.

21.

McLendon

Cohen-Vogel

(2008). Understanding educational policy-making in the American states: Lessons from political science. In Cooper

B. S.

Fusarelli

Cibulka

(Eds.), Handbook of educational politics and policy. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

22.

Miles

Huberman

(1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

23.

Murray

S. E.

Evans

W. N.

Schwab

R. M.

(1998). Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review, 88, 789-812.

24.

Ness

E. C.

(2005, November 15). Deciding who earns hope, promise, and success: Toward a comprehensive model of the merit aid eligibility policy process. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

25.

San Antonio Independent School District v. Gonzales, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).

26.

Smith

D. T.

(1970). Value-added tax: The case for. Harvard Business Review, 48(6), 77-85.

27.

Sunderman

G. L.

(2010). Evidence of the impact of school reform on systems governance and educational bureaucracies in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 34, 226-253.

28.

Surrey

S. S.

(1970). Value-added tax: the case against. Harvard Business Review, 48(6), 86-94.

29.

Trebby

J. P.

(1990). An analysis of the value-added tax as an alternative source of federal revenue. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21(4), 6-18.

30.

United States Department of Education. (2010). Revenues for public elementary and secondary schools, by source of funds: Selected years, 1919-20 through 2006-07. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_172.asp

31.

Wirt

F. M.

Kirst

M. W.

(2005). The political dynamics of American education. Richmond, CA: McCutchan.

32.

Yin

(1989). Case study research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.