Recent years have seen increased attention to the high school–college transition. Students are enrolling in college in record numbers, yet they are also taking increasing numbers of remedial courses. How to measure and report on academic readiness for college is an important policy issue receiving attention from the National Assessment Governing Board, Achieve, and several states. The focus of this article is how to create a measure of academic readiness for college, either by building and validating a new assessment or validating and repurposing an existing assessment. After first describing the disjuncture between high school and college and discussing definitions and indicators of academic readiness, the authors identify four strategies that might be used to create a readiness assessment. The pros and cons of each strategy are discussed.
AbrahamA. A.Jr. (1992). College remedial studies: Institutional practices in the SREB States. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
3.
Achieve, Inc. (2008). Algebra II end-of-course exam fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
ACT, Inc. (2004). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work. Iowa City, IA: Author.
5.
ACT, Inc. (2009). The condition of college readiness 2009. Iowa City, IA: Author.
6.
AdelmanC. (1994). Lessons of a generation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box. Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment (Report No. PLLI-1999-8021). Washington, DC: National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED431363)
8.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
AdelmanC.DanielB.BerkovitsI.OwingsJ. (2003). Postsecondary attainment, attendance, curriculum, and performance: Selected results from the NELS:88/2000 Postsecondary Education Transcript Study (PETS), 2000 (Report No. NCES-2003-394). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480959)
10.
AllenJ.SconingJ. (2005). Using ACT assessment scores to set benchmarks for college readiness (ACT Research Report Series 2005-3). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
11.
AllenN. L.CarlsonJ. E.ZelenakC. A. (1999). The NAEP 1996 technical report (NCES Publication No. 1999-452). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
12.
American Diploma Project. (2004a). Do graduation tests measure up? A closer look at state high school exit exams. Washington, DC: Achieve.
13.
American Diploma Project. (2004b). Ready or not: Creating a high school diploma that counts. Washington, DC: Achieve.
14.
AttewellP.LavinD.DominaT.LeveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886-924.
15.
BartonP. E. (2003). Grading the twelfth graders: More useful and more used NAEP reporting?Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
16.
BraunH. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(1).
17.
BridgemanB. (1991). Essays and multiple-choice tests as predictors of college freshman GPA. Research in Higher Education, 32, 319-331.
18.
BrophyJ.AmesC. (2005). NAEP testing for twelfth graders: Motivational issues. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
19.
CamilliG. (2006). Test fairness. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221-256). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
20.
CarnevaleA. P.DesrochersD. M. (2003). Considerations in using 12th grade NAEP as a prospective indicator of readiness for college and employment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
21.
ConleyD. T. (2003). Understanding university success. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
22.
ConleyD. T. (2007). Toward a more comprehensive conception of college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
23.
DesJardinsS. L.LindsayN. K. (2008). Adding a statistical wrench to the “toolbox.”Research in Higher Education, 49, 172-179.
24.
Editorial Projects in Education. (2009). Diplomas count: Broader horizons—The challenge of college readiness for all students. Education Week, 28(34).
25.
Education Trust. (1999). Ticket to nowhere: The gap between leaving high school and entering college and high performance jobs. Thinking K-16, 3(2).
26.
ErcikanK. (1997). Linking statewide tests to the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Accuracy of combining test results across states. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 145-159.
27.
FeuerM. J.HollandP. W.GreenB. F.BertenthalM. W.HemphillF. C. (1999). Uncommon measures: Equivalence and linkage among educational tests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
FlemingJ.GarciaN. (1998). Are standardized tests fair to African Americans?Journal of Higher Education, 69, 471-495.
30.
GeiserS.StudleyR. (2002). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and the SAT II at the University of California. Oakland: University of California Press.
31.
GreeneJ. P.ForsterG. (2003). Public high school graduation and college readiness rates in the United States. New York, NY: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute.
32.
GrissmerD.FlanaganA. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
33.
IngelsS. J.DaltonB. W.LoGerfoL. (2008). Trends among high school seniors 1972-2004. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
34.
KirstM. W. (2003). College preparation and grade 12 NAEP. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
35.
KirstM. W. (2005). Improving preparation for nonselective postsecondary education: Assessment and accountability issues. In DwyerC. A. (Ed.), Measurement and research in the accountability era (pp. 301-314). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
KobrinJ. L.PattersonB. F.ShawE. J.MatternK. D.BarbutiS. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT for predicting first year college grade point average. New York, NY: College Board.
37.
LewisH. R. (2007). Excellence without a soul: Does liberal education have a future?New York, NY: Public Affairs.
38.
LinnR. L.KiplingerV. L. (1995). Linking statewide test to the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Stability of results. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 135-155.
39.
MerisotisJ.PhippsR. (2000). Remedial education in colleges and universities: What’s really going on?Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 67-86.
40.
MitzelH. C.LewisD. M.PatzR. J.GreenD. R. (2001). The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In CizekG. J. (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 249-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Technical panel on 12th grade preparedness research. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Conditions of education 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2008) Measuring up 2008: The national report card on higher education. San Jose, CA: Author.
46.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (2007). Tough choices or tough times: The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workplace. New York, NY: John Wiley.
47.
National Commission on NAEP 12th Grade Assessment and Reporting. (2004). 12th grade student achievement in America: A new vision for NAEP. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
48.
National Governors Association, Council of Chief State School Officers, & Achieve, Inc. (2008). Benchmarking for success: Ensuring U.S. students receive a world-class education. Washington, DC: Authors.
49.
OlsonL. (2006, April26). Views differ on defining college prep. Education Week, 25(33), 1, 26, 28.
50.
PorterA. C. (2002, October). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.
51.
PorterA. C. (2005). Prospects for school reform and closing the achievement gap. In DwyerC. A. (Ed.), Measurement and research in the accountability era (pp. 59-95).Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
PorterA.C.PolikoffM.S.ZeidnerT.SmithsonJ. (December2008). The quality of content analyses of state student achievement tests and state content standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(4), 2-14.
53.
RockD. A.PollackJ. M. (1995). Psychometric report for the NELS:88 base year through second follow-up (NCES Publication No. 95-382). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
54.
ScottL. A.IngelsS. J.OwingsJ. A. (2008). Interpreting 12th-graders’ NAEP-scaled mathematics performance using high school predictors and postsecondary outcomes from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
55.
SpellingsM. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
56.
St. JohnE. P.CabreraA. F.NoraA.AskerE. H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered. In BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 29-47). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
57.
StanleyJ. C.PorterA. C. (1967). Correlation of scholastic aptitude scores with college grades for Negros versus Whites. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 199-218.
58.
ThissenD. (2007). Linking assessments based on aggregate reporting: Background and issues. In DoransN. J.PommerichM.HollandP. W. (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 287-312). New York, NY: Springer.
59.
VeneziaA.KirstM. W.AntonioA. L. (2003). Betraying the college dream: How disconnected K-12 and postsecondary education systems undermine student aspirations. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Bridge Project.
60.
WayW. D. (2010, May). Measuring college readiness: Validity, cut scores, and looking to the future. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Education Research Association Conference, Denver, CO.
61.
ZwickR. (2004). Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
