The authors consider Ladson-Billings’ (2006) charge to reframe the way the ‘achievement gap’ is viewed, and put forth the metaphor of “bankruptcy” as a way to acknowledge the educational debt and educational inequity and move towards debt forgiveness in public education. Specifically, the bankruptcy metaphor is used to examine the debt embedded in the historical progression of federal school reform policy including the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act. Acknowledging this debt requires valuing and supporting children and their families through educational policy that supports equity. The authors assert that reconciliation of the debt requires working across disciplines and agencies to address the larger community issues surrounding educational inequities.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). The education of Blacks in the south, 1860-1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
4.
AstoneN. M.. (1999). Family demography, social theory, and investment in social capital. Capital, Population and Development Review, 25 (1), 1-31.
5.
BanksJ. A. (2003). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practices. In BanksJ. A.BanksC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research in multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 3-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BarroR. J.LeeJ. (2001). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications, Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 541-563.
7.
BeareH.BoydW. L. (Eds.). (1993). Restructuring schools: An international perspective on the movement to transform the control and performance of schools. London: Falmer.
8.
BeckerG. S. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytical approach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-248). New York: Greenwood.
10.
BrantlingerE. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
11.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
12.
ClarkK. B. (1965). Dark ghetto: Dilemmas of social power. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan Press.
13.
ChristleC. A.JolivetteK.NelsonC. M. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69-88.
14.
CibulkaJ. G. (2003). Educational bankruptcy, takeovers, and reconstitution of failing schools. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 102(1), 249-270.
15.
CibulkaJ. G.BoydW. L. (Eds.). (2003). A race against time: The crisis in urban schooling. Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
CibulkaJ. G.KritekW. J. (Eds.). (1996). Coordination among schools, families, and communities: Prospects for educational reform. New York: SUNY Press.
Cochran-SmithM. (2004). Walking the road. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
ColemanJ. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity study (EEOS), 1966 [Computer file]. ICPSR06389-v3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
20.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, 94(Suppl.), 95-120.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). From “separate but equal” to “No Child Left Behind”: The collision of new standards and old inequalities. In MeierD.WoodG. (Eds.), Many children left behind (pp. 3-32). Boston: Beacon
22.
DeCuirJ. T.DixsonA. D. (2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there”: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31.
23.
DelpitL. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
24.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
25.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1935). Does the Negro need separate schools?The Journal of Negro Education, 4(3), 328-335.
26.
DuncombeW.LukemeyerA.YingerJ. (2008). The No Child Left Behind Act: Have federal funds been left behind?Public Finance Review, 36, 381-407.
27.
EvansG. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 77-92.
28.
FarrellJ. P. (2007). Equality of education: A half-century of comparative evidence seen from a new millennium. In ArnoveR. F.TorresC. A. (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (3rd ed., pp. 129-149). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
FloresG.OlsonL.Tomany-KormanS. C. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparities in early childhood health and health care. Pediatrics, 115, 183-193.
30.
FrankenbergE.OrfieldG. (Eds.). (2007). Lessons in integration: Realizing the promise of racial diversity in American schools. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
31.
FurnéeC. A.GrootW.van den BrinkH. M. (2008). The health effects of education: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 18, 417-421.
32.
GabelS. G.KamermanS. B. (2006). Investing in children: Public commitment in 21 industrialized countries. Social Service Review, 2, 239-263.
33.
Gerstl-PepinC. (2006). The paradox of poverty narratives: Educators struggling with children left behind. Educational Policy, 20, 143-162.
34.
HaasR.WilsonG.CobbC.RallisS. (2005). One hundred percent proficiency: A mission impossible, Equity & Excellence in Education, 38, 180-189.
35.
HardawayR. M. (1995). America goes to school: Law, reform, and crisis in public education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
36.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1710-1791.
37.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Higher Education Opportunity Act (P.L. 110-315).
39.
JacobsonL. (2006). States get poor grades on closing achievement gaps. Education Week, 26(11), 18-19.
40.
JencksC. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
41.
KahneJ. (1996). Reframing educational policy: Democracy, community, and the individual. New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.
43.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
44.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2007). Third annual Brown lecture in education research—the flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36, 318-334.
45.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
46.
Lau v. Nichols, 414 US 563 (1974).
47.
LeonardoZ. (2004). The color of supremacy: Beyond the discourse of ‘white privilege.’Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 137-152.
MacLeodJ. (1995). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
50.
MagnusonK.A.WaldfogelJ. (2005). Early Childhood Care and Education: Effects on Ethic and Racial Gaps in School Readiness. The Future of Children: School Readiness: Closing Racial and Ethnic Gaps (15) 1. pp. 169-196.
51.
MannH. (1891). Life and works of Horace Mann. Boston: Lee and Shepard.
52.
MarshallC.Gerstl-PepinC. (2005). Re-framing educational politics for social justice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
MathisW. J. (2003). No Child Left Behind: Costs and benefits. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 679-686.
54.
McGeeG. W. (2004, April). Closing the achievement gap: Lessons from Illinois’ golden spike high-poverty high-performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(2), 97-125.
55.
McGrathD. J.KuriloffP. J. (1999). “They’re going to tear the doors off this place”: Upper-middle-class parent school involvement and the educational opportunities of other people’s children. Educational Policy, 13, 603-629.
56.
MechamL. R. (2006): Bankruptcy basics (3rd ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
57.
MeierD.WoodG. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind. Boston: Beacon.
NAASP Bulletin. (1999). Improving schools, strengthening families and communities: The vision statement for the coalition for community schools. NAASP Bulletin, 83(4), 4-7.
60.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
61.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.
62.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring. Berkeley: University of California Press.
PittmanR.McGintyD.Gerstl-PepinC. I. (1999). Educational attainment, economic progress, and the goals of education in rural communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(1), 19-30.
67.
PorterA.LinnR. L.TrimbleS. C. (2005). The effects of state decisions about NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress Targets. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 24(4), 32-39.
68.
RobinsonR. (2000). The debt: What America owes to Blacks. New York: Plume.
69.
RothsteinR. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap. New York: Teachers College Press.
70.
RothsteinR. (2008). Leaving “No Child Left Behind” behind. American Prospect, 1(19), 50-54.
71.
RuryJ. (2002). Education and social change: Themes in the history of American Schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72.
SchonD. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In OrtonyA. (Ed). Metaphor and thought (pp. 137-163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SchultzT. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(March), 1-17.
74.
ShonkoffJ. P.PhillipsD. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development, A Report by the Committee on Integrating the science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
75.
SmithT.DesimoneL.UenoK. (2005). “Highly qualified” to do what? The relationship between NCLB teacher quality mandates and the use of reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 75-109.
76.
SpringJ. (2003). American education (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
77.
SpringJ. (2007). American education (13th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
78.
StoutD. (2008, September20). The Wall Street bailout plan, explained. The New York Times, p. A32.
79.
SundermanG.KimJ.OrfieldG. (2005). NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
TateW. F.IV. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In AppleM. W. (Ed.) Review of research in education (Vol. 22, pp. 195-247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
81.
TomlinsonC. (2001). Standards and the art of teaching: Crafting High-quality classrooms. NASSP Bulletin, 85(622), 38.
82.
TomlinsonC. (2002). Invitations to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 6-10.
83.
ToughP. (2008). What ever it takes: Geoffrey Canada’s quest to change Harlem and America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
84.
TyackD.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
UlineC.JohnsonJ.Jr. (2005). This issue: Closing achievement gaps: What will it take?Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 1-3.
86.
WatrasJ. (2002). The foundations of educational curriculum and diversity: 1565 to the present. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
87.
WesternB.KleykampM.RosenfeldJ. (2004). Crime, punishment, and American inequality. In NeckermanK. M. (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 771-796). New York: Russell Sage.
88.
WillisP. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
