Before revising the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation under the new administration, policy makers need to be informed as to whether or not the NCLB labeling formula adequately distinguishes good-quality schools from poor-quality schools. This study tests this question, using rich descriptive data for Milwaukee’s urban school district (MPS). Alternative indicators of school quality, the NCLB subgroup test failure measure and a standardized testing proficiency measure, are used as comparison measures to illustrate the discrimination embedded in the current formula used by the Department of Education.
Aldridge, D.P. ( 1999). Guiding philosophical principles for a DuBoisian-based African-American educational model. Journal of Negro Education , 68, 182-199.
2.
Alexander, K.L., Entwisle, D.R., & Dauber, S.L. ( 1996). Children in motion: School transfers and elementary school performance. Journal of Educational Research, 90 (1), 3-12.
3.
Apple, M.W. ( 2006). Educating the "right" way (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
4.
Beaver, W. ( 2005). James Coleman and No Child Left Behind. Sociological Imagination, 41(1), 31-46.
5.
Berends, M. ( 2007, November 5). Instructional conditions in charter schools and students’ mathematics achievement gains. Center for Research on Educational Opportunity (CREO) Lecture Series, Notre Dame.
6.
Borsuk, A.J. ( 2006), Program for new principals gets rolling. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
7.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
8.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. ( 1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Braun, H., Jenkins, F., Grigg, W., & Tirre, W. ( 2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10.
Bryk, A.S., & Schneider, B. ( 2002). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement . New York: Russell Sage.
11.
Center on Education Policy. (2008). A call to restructure restructuring: Lessons from the No Child Left Behind Act in five states. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., & Kober, N. ( 2007). Answering the question that matters most: Has student achievement increased since No Child Left Behind?Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
13.
Cole, C. ( 2006). Closing the achievement gap series: Part III. what is the impact of NCLB on the inclusion of students with disabilities?education policy brief (4[11], Fall 2006). Indiana: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.
14.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics .
15.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1975). School desegregation: The courts and suburban migration . Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
16.
Cruickshank, J., Barron, J., Huntley, S., & Hayner, D. ( 2006, June 14). Finding ways to get top teachers into underperforming schools. Chicago Sun Times.
17.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. ( 2002). Defining "highly qualified teachers": What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13.
18.
Dillon, S. ( 2003). Diverse schools more likely to be labeled as failing, study says. New York Times, pp. 1.
19.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA/NCLB).20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 Et Seq. Public Law No. 107-110 2001.
20.
Entwisle, D.R., & Alexander, K.L. (1993). Entry into school: The beginning school transition and educational stratification in the United States . Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 401-423.
21.
Ferguson, R. ( 1998). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the black-white test score gap, and, can schools narrow the black-white test score gap? In C. Jencks, & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
22.
Gamoran, A. ( 2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 135-153.
23.
Ginsburg-Block, M.D., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 560-569.
24.
Handy, D.G. ( 2002). Parent and student perceptions of social systems that promote success. Dissertation, Florida State University .
25.
Hanushek, E.A. ( 1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance . Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45.
26.
Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. ( 2002). Lessons about design of state accountability systems. Taking Account of Accountability: Assessing Policy and Politics. Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
27.
Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D., & Greenwald, R. ( 1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes (An exchange: Part 1). Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
28.
Hendrie, C. ( 2005). NCLB transfer policy seen as flawed. Education Week, 24(32), 1-3.
29.
Hillard III, A. ( 2004). No mystery: Closing the achievement gap between African-Americans an excellence. Young, gifted, and black: Promoting high achievement among African American students (pp. 5). Boston: Beacon.
30.
Hoff, D.J. ( 2009). Schools Struggling to Meet Key Goal on Accountability . Education Week, 28(16), 14-15.
31.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. E. (Eds.). (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
32.
Kalenberg, R.D. ( 2001). Learning from James Coleman. Public Interest , 144, 54-73.
33.
Karen, D. ( 2005). No child behind? sociology ignored!Sociology of Education, 78, 165-182.
34.
Karp, S. ( 2004). NCLB’s Selective vision of equality: Some gaps count more than others. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 53-65). Boston: Beacon Press.
35.
Kerbow, D. ( 1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform . Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk , 1(2), 147-169.
36.
Kim, J.S., & Sunderman, G.L. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 3.
37.
Kohn, A. ( 2004). NCLB and the effort to privatize public education . In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 79-100). Boston : Beacon Press.
38.
Kozol, J. ( 1992). Savage inequalities : Children in America’s schools . New York: Crown.
39.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
40.
Lareau, A. ( 2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life . Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Lee, V.E., & Burkam, D.T. ( 2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school (No. 1-932066-02-0). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute .
42.
Lewis, A.C. ( 2004). Still left behind. Education Digest , 70(1), 68-72.
43.
Long, L.H. ( 1975). Does migration interfere with children’s progress in school? Sociology of Education, 48, 369-381.
44.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. ( 2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
45.
Milwaukee Public Schools. (2005a, December 15). 2004-2005 report card for the Milwaukee public schools. Available from http:\\www.2.milwaukee.k12.us/portal/server.pt
46.
Milwaukee Public Schools. (2005b, December 15). Making adequate yearly progress. Available from http://www.2.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/portal/server.pt
47.
Milwaukee Public Schools. (2005c, December 15). Reports. Available from http://www.2.milwaukee.k12.wi.us .
48.
Milwaukee Public Schools. (2006, August 13). Moving/Transfer enrollment. Available from http://www.2.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/supt/Moving_Transfer_Enrollment.html.
49.
Mishel, L., & Roy, J. ( 2006). Rethinking high school graduation rates and trends . Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
50.
Moscovitch, E. ( 2001). Evaluation of the Alabama reading initiative. Final report . Montgomery: Alabama Department of Education.
51.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2005). State profiles: The nation’s report Card. Available fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/states/profile.asp .
52.
National Education Association. (2008). Attracting and keeping quality teachers. Retrieved December 9, 2008, from http://www.nea.org/teachershortage/index.htm
53.
Noguera, P.A. ( 2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York: Teachers College Press.
54.
Novak, J.R., & Fuller, B. ( 2003). Penalizing diverse schools? PACE policy brief 03-04. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
55.
Offenberg, R.M. ( 2004). Inferring adequate yearly progress of schools from student achievement in highly mobile communities. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9, 337-356.
56.
Olson, L., & Robelen, E.W. ( 2004). Data show schools making progress on federal goals . Education Week, 24(2), 1-25.
57.
Owens, A., & Sunderman, G.L. (2006). Policy brief: School accountability under NCLB: Aid or obstacle for measuring racial equity?Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Civil Rights Project.
58.
Packer, J. ( 2004, July). No Child Left Behind and adequate yearly progress fundamental flaws: A forecast for failure. National Education Association Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.
59.
Peppard, J. ( 2008). ESES information update: ESEA provision for highly qualified teachers. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
60.
Perry, T. ( 2004). Up from the parched earth: Toward a theory of African-American achievement; Freedom for literacy and literacy for freedom: The African-American philosophy of education; competing theories of group achievement; Achieving in post-civil rights America: The outline of a theory . In Young, gifted, and black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students (pp. 1-3). Boston: Beacon.
61.
Phillips, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G.J., Klebanov, P., & Crane, J. ( 1998). Family background, parenting practices, and the black-white test score gap. In C. Jencks, & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
62.
Phillips, M., & Chin, T. ( 2004). School inequality: What do we know? In K. Neckerman (Ed.) Social inequality (pp. 467-519). New York: Russell Sage.
63.
Pribesh, S., & Downey, D.B. ( 1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance? Demography, 36, 521-534.
64.
Ragin, C.C. ( 2000). Fuzzy-Set social science. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
65.
RAND Corporation. (2006). Estimating graduation and dropout rates with longitudinal data: A case study in the Pittsburgh public schools. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
66.
Rhodes, V.L. ( 2005). Kids on the move: The effects of student mobility on NCLB school accountability ratings. Penn GSE Perspectives in Urban Education Week, 3(3), 1-30.
67.
Rockoff, J.E. ( 2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247-252.
68.
Rumberger, Russell W., & Larson, K.A. ( 1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107, 1-34.
69.
Smith, M.S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systematic school reform . In S. H. Fuhrman, & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing. Philadelphia: Falmer .
70.
Sunderman, G.L. ( 2006). The unraveling of No Child Left Behind: How negotiated changes transform the law. Cambridge, MA : The Harvard Civil Rights Project.
71.
Thompson, T.G., & Barnes, R.E. ( 2007). Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the promise of our nation’s children. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
72.
Tough, P. ( 2006, November 26). What it takes to make a student. The New York Times Magazine.
73.
Tracey, C.A., Sunderman, G.L., & Orfield, G. ( 2005). Changing NCLB district accountability standards: Implications for racial equity. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Civil Rights Project.
74.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008, March 1). Overview: Four pillars of NCLB. Available from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/4pillars.html
75.
Valencia, R.R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D.E. ( 2001). Let’s treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability in Texas revisited. Phi Delta Kappan , 83, 318-323.
76.
Valenzuela, A., & Dornbusch, S.M. (1994). Familism and social capital in the academic-achievement of Mexican origin and Anglo adolescents. Social Science Quarterly, 75(1), 18-36.
77.
Weckstein, P. ( 2003). Accountability and student mobility under Title I of the No Child Left Behind act. Journal of Negro Education , 72(1), 117-125.
78.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. ( 2006a, August 12). 2002-03 school performance data. Available from http://dpi.wi.gov/spr/index.html
79.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. ( 2006b, August 12). Demographic student data, Available from http://data.dpi.state.wi.us/data.
80.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. ( 2007, January). Staff, teacher, and program data, Available from http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/sig/dm-staffchr.html.
81.
Yahoo! Neighborhood Profiles. (2007, January). Neighborhood profiles, by zipcode, http://realestate.yahoo.com/Neighborhoods.
