Apple, M.W. ( 1986). Teachers and texts. New York: Routledge.
2.
Apple, M.W. ( 1995). Education and power (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
3.
Apple, M.W. ( 2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
4.
Apple, M.W. ( 2006). Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York : Routledge.
5.
Apple, M.W., Aasen, P., Cho, M.K., Gandin, L., Oliver, A., Sung, Y.K., et al. (2003). The state and the politics of knowledge . New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
6.
Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (Eds.). (2009). The Routledge International handbook of critical education. New York: Routledge.
7.
Apple, M. W., & Buras, K. L. (Eds.). (2006). The subaltern speak: Curriculum, power, and educational struggles. New York : Routledge.
8.
Au, W. ( 2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267.
9.
Au, W. ( 2009b). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. New York: Routledge .
10.
Au, W. ( 2009a). High-stakes testing and discursive control: The triple bind for nonstandard student identities. Multicultural Perspectives , 11(2), 65-71.
11.
Ball, S. ( 2007). Education, plc. London: Routledge.
12.
Ball, S. ( 2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
13.
Burch, P.E. ( 2006). The new educational privatization: Educational contracting and high stakes accountability. Teachers College Record, 108, 2582-2610.
14.
Burch, P. ( 2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York: Routledge.
15.
Center on Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era . Washington, DC: Author.
16.
Cuban, L. ( 2004). The blackboard and the bottom line: Why schools can’t be businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of "No Child Left Behind." Race, Ethnicity, and Education , 10, 245-260.
18.
Emery, K., & Ohanian, S. ( 2004). Why is corporate America bashing our public schools?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19.
Gillborn, D. ( 2009). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy. London: Routledge.
20.
Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. ( 2000). Rationing education. Philadelphia : Open University Press.
21.
Guisbond, L., & Neill, M. ( 2004). Failing our children: No Child Left Behind undermines quality and equity in education. Clearing House, 78(1), 12-16.
22.
Hursh, D.W. ( 2007). Exacerbating inequality: The failed promise of the No Child Left Behind Act. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 10, 295-308.
23.
Karp, S. ( 2006). Bandaids or bulldozers? What’s next for NCLB. Rethinking Schools, 20(3), 10-13.
24.
Karp, S. ( 2007/2008, Winter). NCLB stalled, but still armed and dangerous. Rethinking Schools. Retrieved January 14, 2010, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/22_02/nclb222.shtml
25.
Kim, J.S., & Sunderman, G.L. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 3-13.
26.
Koretz, D. ( 2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Kornhaber, M.L., & Orfield, G. ( 2001). High-stakes testing policies: Examining their assumptions and consequences. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 1-18). New York: Century Foundation Press.
28.
Ladson-Billings, G. ( 2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
29.
Lapayese, Y.V. ( 2007). Understanding and undermining the racio-economic agenda of No Child Left Behind: Using critical race methodology to investigate the labor of bilingual children. Race, Ethnicity, and Education , 10, 309-321.
30.
Lee, J. ( 2006). Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
31.
Lipman, P. ( 2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
32.
Mathis, W.J. ( 2003). No Child Left Behind: Costs and benefits. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 679-686.
33.
McNeil, L.M. ( 2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
34.
Meier, D., & Wood, G. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools . Boston: Beacon Press.
35.
Nichols, S.L. ( 2007). High-stakes testing: Does it increase achievement? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 47-64.
Nichols, S.L., Glass, G.V., & Berliner, D.C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved January 14, 2010, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/
38.
Obama, B. ( 2008, September 9). Education speech delivered in Dayton, Ohio. Retrieved December 21, 2008, from http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/obama_education_speech_in_ohio.html
39.
Oulahan, A. ( 2008, Fall). Action education: "None of the above."Rethinking Schools. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/23_01/none231.shtml
40.
Popham, W.J. ( 2001). The truth about testing: An educator’s call to action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41.
Ravitch, D. ( 2009). In education, the new administration is as ruinous as the old. Politico. Retrieved March 11, 2009 , from http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Diane_Ravitch_ED3CC65A-1240-42E1-9716-8DB5FD3426D8.html
42.
Renter, D.S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Joftus, S., & Zabala, D. ( 2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
43.
Rothstein, R. ( 2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
44.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). No Child Left Behind is working. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2005). Leaving children behind: How "Texas style" accountability fails Latino youth . New York: State University of New York Press.