Emerging from an evaluation of Wisconsin’s Student Achievement Guarantee in Education program (SAGE), a multidimensional program popularly known for its class size reduction component, this article examines SAGE’s lighted schoolhouse initiative aimed to strengthen links between home and school. Drawing on family focus groups held at nine SAGE schools, we use Bakhtin’s tools of addressivity and answerability to explore how families constructed locally specific identities within particular community contexts. Family discussions focused on responding to needs: family social needs, the need for social connection, and perceived answerability felt by families for their community. We suggest that schools would be more successful in building relationships if they used the potential power promised in class size reduction programs and developed programming focused on the needs and resources of families in particular communities rather than imagining a generic, one-size-fits-all model of parents.
Abrams, L.S., & Gibbs, J.T. ( 2002). Disrupting the logic of home-school relations: Parent involvement strategies and practices of inclusion and exclusion. Urban Education, 37, 384-407.
2.
Bain, H.P., & Jacobs, R. ( 1990). The case for smaller classes and better teachers. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
Biddle, B.J., & Berliner, D.C. (2002). What research says about small classes and their effects. In pursuit of better schools: What research says (No. EPSL-0202-101-EPRP). Tempe: Education Policy Studies Lab, Arizona State University; Rockefeller Foundation, New York.
5.
Brantlinger, E. ( 2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and justifies school advantage. London: Falmer.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. ( 1978). Who needs parent education? Teachers College Record, 79, 767-787.
7.
Clark, K., & Holquist, M. ( 1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Comer, J.P. ( 1980). School power. New York: New York University.
9.
Comer, J.P. ( 1984). Home-school relationships as they affect the academic success of children. Education and Urban Society, 16, 323-337.
10.
Coontz, S. ( 2000). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
11.
David, M. ( 1980). State, family and education. London : Routledge.
12.
David, M., Edwards, R., Hughes, M., & Ribbens, J. ( 1993). Mothers and education: Inside out?: Exploring family-education policy and experience. London: St. Martin’s Press.
13.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. ( 1991). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment . American Journal of Education, 100, 20-46.
14.
Eccles, J.S., & Harold, R.D. ( 1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In A. Bloom & J. F. Bunn (Ed.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Emerson, C. ( 1997). The first hundred years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Epstein, J.L. ( 1995). School/family/community partnerships. Caring the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-713.
17.
Epstein, J.L., & Becker, H.J. ( 1982). Teachers’ reported practices of parent involvement: Problems & possibilities. The Elementary School Journal , 83, 103-113.
18.
Epstein, J.L., & Dauber, S. ( 1991). School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 289-303.
19.
Finn, J.D., & Achilles, C.M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557-577.
20.
Finn, J.D., Pannozzo, G.M. & Achilles, C. ( 2003). The "whys" of class size: Student behavior in small classes . Review of Educational Research, 73, 321-368.
21.
Glass, G.S., & Smith, M.L. ( 1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2-16.
22.
Goddard, R.D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W.K. ( 2001). A multilevel examination of distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 3-17.
23.
Gonzalez, N.E., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. ( 2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households & classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Graue, E., Hatch, K., Rao, K., & Oen, D. ( 2007). The wisdom of class size reduction. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 670-700.
25.
Graue, M.E., Kroeger, J., & Prager, D. ( 2001). A Bakhtinian analysis of particular home-school relations . American Educational Research Journal, 38, 1-32.
26.
Graue, M.E., & Walsh, D.J. ( 1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
27.
Griffith, A., & Smith, D. ( 2004). Mothering for schooling. London: Routledge.
28.
Grissmer, D. ( 1999). Class size effects: Assessing the evidence, its policy implications, and future research agenda. conclusion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 231-248.
29.
Hanushek, E.A. ( 1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143-163.
30.
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. ( 1995). Parent involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97, 310-331.
31.
Katz, L. ( 1984). Talks with teachers: A collection. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32.
Lareau, A. ( 1989). Home advantage. London: Falmer.
33.
Lightfoot, S.L. ( 1978). Worlds apart: Relationships between families and schools . New York: Basic Books.
34.
Marshall, N.L., Noonan, A.E., McCartney, K., Marx, F., & Keefe, N. ( 2001). It takes an urban village: Parenting networks of urban families. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 163-182.
35.
Molnar, A., & Zmrazek, J. ( 1994). Improving the achievement of Wisconsin’s students. Urban initiative task force recommendations and action plan. Bulletin No. 95079. Wisconsin: Wisconsin State Dept. of Public Instruction, Madison. Bureau for Policy and Budget.
36.
National Education Goals Panel. (1999). The National Education Goals Report. Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Normore, A.H., & Ilon, L. ( 2006). Cost-effective school inputs. Is class size reduction the best educational expenditure for Florida? Educational Policy, 20, 429-454.
38.
Ogawa, R.T., & Huston, D. ( 1999). California’s class-size reduction initiative: Differences in teacher experience and qualifications across schools. Educational Policy, 13, 659-673.
39.
Rouse, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. ( 2005). Thirty seventh annual Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Retrieved February 16, 2006, from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0509pol.htm#3
40.
Sheldon, S.B. ( 2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary schools to student achievement on state tests. Urban Review, 35, 149-165.
41.
Smith, M.L., & Glass, G.V. ( 1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 419-433.
42.
Stecher, B., Bohrnstedt, G., Kirst, M., McRobbie, J., & Williams, T. ( 2001). Class-size reduction in California: A story of hope, promise, and unintended consequences. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 670-674.
43.
Temple Sinai Congregation of Toronto. (n.d.). Traditional stories for inspiration. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from http://www.templesinai.net/our_community/caring_community?page=3445
44.
The SAGE law, Wisconsin legislature. (2004).
45.
Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Pisch, C., Greenfield, P.M., & Quiroz, B. ( 2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum .
46.
United States Department of Education. (1996 ). Survey on family and school partnerships in public schools K-8 (No. FRSS-58). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
47.
Waller, W. ( 1932). The sociology of teaching. New York : John Wiley.
48.
Zahorik, J., Halbach, A., Ehrle, K., & Molnar, A. ( 2003). Teaching practices for smaller classes. Educational Leadership, 61, 75-77.
