In 23 states, members of the high school class of 2008 were required to pass a state high school exit examination (HSEE) to earn regular high school diplomas. Proponents of these policies claim that they improve student academic achievement, although critics argue that they reduce the quality of instruction without raising academic achievement. Using nationally representative data collected to facilitate the analysis of temporal achievement trends, the effects of minimum competency and more difficult state HSEEs on student achievement in mathematics and reading between 1971 and 2004 are evaluated. The potential disparate impacts of state HSEEs on the achievement of students by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and prior academic achievement are examined in this study. No evidence is found for any effects of state HSEEs on achievement in either reading or mathematics at the mean or at the 10th, 20th, 80th, or 90th percentiles of the achievement distribution.
Ali, R. (2006). Statement by Russlynn Ali on State Superintendent O'Connell's CAHSEE announcement. Oakland, CA: The Education Trust-West.
2.
Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript, EPSL-0211-125-EPRU. Tempe: Educational Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University .
3.
Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2003). The testing divide: New research on the intended and unintended impact of high-stakes testing. Peer Review, 5, 31-32.
4.
Bishop, J.H., Mane, F., & Bishop, M. (2001). Is standards-based reform working? . . . and for whom? Unpublished manuscript, Working Paper 01-11. Ithaca, NY: Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.
5.
Bishop, J.H., Mane, F., Bishop, M., & Moriarty, J.Y. (2001). The role of end-of-course exams and minimum competency exams in standards-based reforms. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers in educational policy 2001 (pp. 267-345). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Bishop, J.H., Moriarty, J.Y., & Mane, F. (2000). Diplomas for learning, not seat time: The impacts of New York regents examinations. Economics of Education Review , 19, 333-349.
7.
Bond, L.A., & King, D. (1995). State high school graduation testing: Status and recommendations. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
8.
Carnoy, M., Elmore, R., & Siskin, L.S. (2003). The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing. New York: Routledge.
9.
Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305-331.
10.
Carnoy, M., Loeb, S., & Smith, T. (2003). The impact of accountability policies in texas high schools. In M. Carnoy, R. Elmore, & L. S. Siskin (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high stakes testing (pp. 147-173). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
11.
Center on Education Policy. (2003). State high school exit exams: Put to the test. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
Center on Education Policy. (2006). State high school exit exams: A challenging year. Washington, DC: Author.
Cuban, L. (2001). Why bad reforms won't give us good schools. American Prospect, 12(1), 46-48.
15.
Dee, T.S. (2003). Learning to earn. Education Next , 3(3), 64-70.
16.
Dee, T.S., & Jacob, B. (2006). Do high school exit exams influence educational attainment or labor market performance? Unpublished manuscript, Working Paper 12199, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12199
17.
Gilmore, M.E. (1927). Coaching for intelligence tests. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 19, 319-330.
18.
Gordon, B.M. (2000). On high stakes testing: Division G News (Vol. Fall). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19.
Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
20.
Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
21.
Heubert, J.P. (2000). Graduation and promotion testing: Potential benefits and risks for minority students, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. Poverty and Race, 9, 1-2, 5-7.
22.
Jacob, B. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 99-121.
23.
Jaegar, R.M. (1982). The final hurdle: Minimum competency achievement testing. In H. Garber (Ed.), The rise and fall of national test scores (pp. 223-246). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Klein, S.P., Hamilton, L.S., McCaffrey, D.F., & Stecher, B.M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? RAND Issue Paper. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
25.
Koenker, R., & Hallock, K.F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143-156.
26.
Koretz, D.M., & Barron, S.I. (1998). The validity of gains in scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Unpublished manuscript, RAND Research Brief MR-1014-EDU. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
27.
Linn, R. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-16.
28.
Linn, R.L., Koretz, D., & Baker, E.L. (1996). Assessing the validity of the national assessment of educational progress: NAEP Technical Review Panel White Paper. Unpublished manuscript, Los Angeles.
29.
Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Madaus, G.F., & Clarke, M. (2001). The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from one hundred years of test data. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 85-106). New York: The Century Foundation Press.
31.
McNeil, L.M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform . Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 728-734.
32.
Mislevy, R.J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177-196.
33.
Mislevy, R.J., Honson, E.G., & Muraki, E. (1992). Scaling procedures in NAEP. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 131-154.
34.
Murphy, K.M., & Peltzman, S. (2004). School performance and the youth labor market . Journal of Labor Economics, 22, 299-327.
35.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
National Research Council. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Committee on Appropriate Test Use, J. P. Heubert & R. M. Hauser, (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Board on Testing and Assessment, National Research Council.
37.
National Research Council. (2001). Understanding dropouts: Statistics, strategies, and high-stakes testing. Committee on educational excellence and testing equity, A. Beatty, U. Neisser, W. T. Trent, & J. P. Heubert (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
38.
Neill, M. (1998). High stakes tests do not improve student learning . Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA: The National Center for Fair & Open Testing. Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http://www.fairtest.org/high-stakes-tests-do-not-improve-student-learning
39.
Neill, M., & Gayler, K. (2001). Do high-stakes graduation tests improve learning outcomes? Using state-level NAEP data to evaluate the effects of mandatory graduation tests. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 107-126). New York: The Century Foundation Press.
40.
Perie, M., Moran, R., & Lutkus, A.D. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
41.
Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.
Reardon, S.F. (1996, April). Eighth grade minimum competency testing and early high school dropout patterns. Unpublished manuscript, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
44.
Reardon, S.F., & Galindo, C. (2002, April). Do high-stakes tests affect students' decisions to drop out of school? Evidence from NELS. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.
45.
Roderick, M., Jacob, B.A., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). The impact of high-stakes testing in chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 333-358.
46.
Rosenhall, L. (2006, February 8). Teacher quality tops chief's list . The Sacramento Bee, A3.
47.
Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227-241.
48.
Rust, K. (2004). Sampling and field operations at Westat, 1983-2001 . In L. V. Jones & I. Olkin (Ed.), The nation's report card: Evolution and perspectives (pp. 427-448). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Education Foundation.
49.
Warren, J.R., Grodsky, E., & Lee, J.C. (2008). State high school exit examinations and post-secondary labor market outcomes. Sociology of Education, 81(1), 77-107.
50.
Warren, J.R., Jenkins, K.N., & Kulick, R. (2006). High school exit examinations and state-level completion and GED rates, 1975 through 2002. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(2), 131-152.
51.
Warren, J.R., & Kulick, R. (2007). Modeling states' enactment of high school exit examination policies. Social Forces, 86, 215-230.
52.
Wideen, M.F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science . Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 428-444.
53.
Zieleskiewicz, J.R. (2000). Subject-matter experts' perceptions of the relevance of the NAEP long-term trend items in science and mathematics. In N. S. Raju, J. W. Pellegrino , M. W. Bertenthal, K. J. Mitchell, & L. R. Jones (Eds.), Grading the nation's report card: Research from the evaluation of NAEP (pp. 123-131). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
