American public education has historically been considered a great success. Since the release of the landmark 1983 federal report, A Nation at Risk, concerns about many aspects of American education have been highly publicized. Although the actual extent of the degree of problems facing public education is debated, this article argues that the state of education has become part of a “culture of fear” gripping many aspects of society. The research examines polling data and newspaper stories on selected educational topics for four newspapers since 1980 and shows that both the number of stories on these topics and negative tone of the stories have increased, while polling data suggest that public perceptions about education have remained stable. At the same time, however, issues of quality have emerged as concerns. The implications of these findings suggest a need for further study of the current nature of the politics of education.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, B.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Birkland, T.A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting . Journal of Public Policy, 18, 53-74.
4.
Brock, D. (2002). Blinded by the Right: The conscience of an ex-conservative . New York: Crown.
5.
Chernow, R. (2004). Alexander Hamilton. New York : Penguin.
6.
Cobb, R.W., & Elder, C.D. (1972). Participation in American politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly,17, 1-25.
8.
Crigler, A.N. (1998). The psychology of political communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Demarrais, K. (2005). The haves and the have mores: Fueling a conservative ideological war on public education (or tracking the money). Educational Studies, 39, 201-240.
10.
Dozier, R.W., Jr. (1998). Fear itself. New York: St. Martin's.
11.
Edelman, M. (1964). Symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12.
Field, K. (2007, July 4). Draft report from federal panel takes aim at academe. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A21.
13.
Ginsberg, R. (1983). Analyzing school surveys, Chicago, 1897-1964. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
14.
Glassner, B. (1999). The culture of fear: WhyAmericans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Juliussen, E. (2004). Internet user forecast by country. Arlington Heights, IL: Computer Industry Almanac. Retrieved from http://www.c-i-a.com/internetuseres.htm
16.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
Kosicki, G.M. (1993). Problems and on-going opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127.
18.
Krishnamurti, J. (1995). On fear. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
19.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
20.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media . Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-185.
21.
National Academy of Sciences. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform (DHHS Publication No. ADM 065-000-00177-2). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23.
Perkinson, H.J. (1977). Imperfect panacea: American faith in education, 1865-1976 (2nd ed.). New York : Random House.
24.
Peterson, P.E. (1995). Foreward. In R. Ginsberg & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Commissions, Reports, Reforms, and Educational Policy (pp. ix-x). Westport, CT: Praeger.
25.
Polsby, N.W. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Pride, R.A. (2002). How critical events rather than performance trends shape public evaluations of the schools. Urban Review, 34, 159-178.
27.
Rachman, S.J. (1990). Fear and courage. New York : W. H. Freeman.
28.
Rich, A. (2001). U.S. think tanks and the intersection of ideology, advocacy, and influence. NIRA Review, 8, 54-59.
29.
Riker, W.H. (1993). Agenda formation. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
30.
Robin, C. (2004). Fear: The history of a political idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Robins, R.S., & Post, J.M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven : Yale University Press.
32.
Rogers, E.M., Dearing, J.W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 68-84.
33.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1975). The semisovereign people. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
34.
Shklar, J. (1989). The liberalism of fear. In N. L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the moral life (pp. 21-38). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Stone, D. (1997). The policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W. W. Norton.
36.
Tyack, D.B. (1976). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Walsh, K., Glasser, D., & Wilcox, D.D. (2006). What education schools aren't teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren't learning. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
38.
Welch, D. (1993). The ThirdReich: Politics and propaganda. New York: Routledge .
39.
Wimpelberg, R.K., & Ginsberg, R. (1988). The national commission approach to educational reform. In R. Crowson & J. Hannaway (Eds.), The politics of education yearbook (pp. 13-25). London: Falmer.
