This study used testimony, documents, and interviews to examine the use of information in higher education policy making. The article discusses the coalition alignment regarding the state's tuition assistance program and the concomitant information sources on which each coalition drew in the budget process. The results show that there were differences in information sources between and within coalitions, and information was used for different purposes. The article demonstrates the potential utility of Paul A. Sabatier's Advocacy Coalition Framework and elicits information-related suggestions for its future applicability to higher education policy analysis.
2001-2002 joint budget hearing: higher education. (2001). New York State Legislature, Senate Committee on Finance, New York State Legislature, Assembly Committee on Ways and Means, 1/31/2001, Albany, New York.
2.
Anderson, J.E. (1997). The study of public policy. In Current issues in public policy and higher education (pp. 172-188). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing.
3.
Assembly Ways and Means Committee. (2003). Overview of executive budget: Fiscal year April 1, 2003 to Mary 31, 2004. Albany, NY: State of New York.
4.
Cerych, L. (1992). Reforms and higher education: Implementation. In B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of higher education (Vol. 2). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press .
5.
Clark, B.R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in a cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
Commission on New York State Student Financial Aid. (2000). Report of the commission on New York State student financial aid. Albany, NY: Commission on New York State Student Financial Aid.
7.
Fairbanks, M. J. (Ed.). (1989). A guide to New York state government (6th ed.). Crotonon-Hudson, NY: Policy Studies Associates.
8.
Gaither, G. H. (Ed.). (1999). The multicampus system: Perspectives on practice and prospects. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
9.
Grindle, M.S., & Thomas, J.W. (1991). Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Hearn, J.C., & Griswold, C.P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161-190.
11.
Jenkins-Smith, H.C., & Sabatier, P.A. (1993). Methodological appendix: Measuring longitudinal change in elite beliefs using content analysis of public documents. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 237-257). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
13.
Leslie, D.W., & Novak, R.J. (2003). Substance versus politics: Through the dark mirror of governance reform. Educational Policy, 17(1), 98-120.
14.
In the matter of a public hearing to consider the executive budget of the Governor, higher education: before the New York State Senate Standing Committee on Finance and the New York State Assembly Committee on Ways and Means. (1996).
15.
McCall, H.C. (2002). 2002-03 Budget Analysis: Review of economic and revenue forecasts. Albany, NY: Office of the State Comptroller.
16.
McLendon, M.K. (2003). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17(1), 165-191.
17.
Mulholland, S., & Shakespeare, C. (2005). An analysis of frameworks for higher education policy studies. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/iesp.olde/aiheps/
18.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2000). Measuring up 2000: The state-by-state report card for higher education. Washington, DC: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
19.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2002). Measuring up 2002: The state-by-state report card for higher education. Washington, DC: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
20.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2004). Measuring up 2004: The state-by-state report card for higher education. Washington, DC: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
21.
New York State Division of the Budget. (1995 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
22.
New York State Division of the Budget. (1996 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
23.
New York State Division of the Budget. (1997 ). New York State budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
24.
New York State Division of the Budget. (1998 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
25.
New York State Division of the Budget. (1999 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
26.
New York State Division of the Budget. (2000 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
27.
New York State Division of the Budget. (2001 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
28.
New York State Division of the Budget. (2002 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
29.
New York State Division of the Budget. (2003 ). New York State executive budget. Albany, NY: New York State Governor.
30.
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge; NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 35-71). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
32.
Public hearing, impact of the governor's budget proposal on higher education. (2000).
Richardson, R.C. (2004). A conceptual framework for comparative studies of higher education policy. New York: Alliance for International Higher Education Policy Studies.
35.
Richardson, R.C., Bracco, K.R., Callan, P.M., & Finney, J.E. (1999). Designing state higher education systems for a new century. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.
36.
Richardson, R.C., & Martinez, M. (2002). New Jersey and New Mexico: Explaining the differences in the performance of higher education systems. New York : Alliance for International Higher Education Policy Studies.
37.
Richardson, R.C., Parker, T., & Shakespeare, C. (2004). Public policy and higher education performance in the state of New York. Retrieved November 10, 2005, from http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/iesp.olde/aiheps/
38.
Rothstein, B. (1988). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of institutional design. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
39.
Sabatier, P.A. (1986a). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Policy Analysis(5), 481-504.
40.
Sabatier, P.A. (1986b). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48.
41.
Sabatier, P.A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 649-692.
42.
Sabatier, P.A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98-130.
43.
Sabatier, P.A. (2003, September). From policy implementation to policy change: A personal odyssey. Paper presented at the Reform and Change in Higher Education: Renewed Expectations and Improved Performance? meeting, Porto, Portugal.
44.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45.
Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117-166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46.
Sabatier, P., & Zafonte, M. (2004). Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: Automotive pollution control, 1963-1989. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 75-107.
47.
Stonecash, J. M. (Ed.). (2001). Governing NewYork State (4th ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices PCT12 and P13. Retrieved April 27, 2003, from http://factfinder.census.gov/bf/_lang=en_vt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_GCTP5_US9_geo_id=01000US.html.
49.
Ward, R.B. (2002). New York State government: What it does, how it works. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute Press.
50.
Winter, S. (2003). State quick facts: New York. Retrieved January 10, 2003, from http://dev .sheeo.org/sqf/1state.asp?state=ny
51.
Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
52.
Yin, R.K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation . Current Sociology, 40, 121-137.
53.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
54.
Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P.A. (1998). Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems . Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 473-505.
