It is possible to simultaneously increase academic excellence and diversity. This article describes how the theory of successful intelligence can be used to accomplish both of these goals. The theory postulates that intelligence comprises creative skills in generating novel ideas, analytical skills in discerning whether they are good ideas, and practical skills in implementing the ideas and persuading others of their worth. The article summarizes the Rainbow Project, based on the theory of successful intelligence. The project involved creation and administration of tests of analytical, creative, and practical abilities to supplement the SAT. The tests substantially increase prediction of college success (as measured by first-year GPA) and decrease differences in scores among members of diverse ethnic groups.
Bernstein, B. (2003). Towards a theory of educational transmissions: Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
2.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. (Original work published 1905)
3.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Bowen, W.G., & Bok, D. (2000). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Bowen, W.G., Kurzweil, M.A., & Tobin, E.M. (2006). Equity and excellence in American higher education . Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
6.
Camara, W.J., & Schmidt, A.E. (1999). Group differences in standardized testing and social stratification (College Board Research Rep. No. 99-5). Retrieved December 21, 2006, from http://www.collegeboard.com/research/home/
7.
Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: World Book.
8.
Cattell, R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Ceci, S.J. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic.
12.
Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Hedlund, J., Wilt, J.M., Nebel, K.R., Ashford, S.J., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the Graduate Management Admissions Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 101-127.
14.
Herrnstein, R.J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
15.
Hezlett, S., Kuncel, N., Vey, A., Ones, D., Campbell, J., & Camara, W.J. (2001, April). The effectiveness of the SAT in predicting success early and late in college: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.
16.
Jensen, A.R. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 255-310). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Karabel, J. (2006). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion atHarvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Mariner.
18.
Kobrin, J.L., Camara, W.J., & Milewski, G.B. (2002). The Utility of the SAT I and SAT II for admissions decisions in California and the nation (College Board Report No. 2002-6). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
19.
McDonough, P.M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
Nuñes, T. (1994). Street intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1045-1049). New York : Macmillan.
21.
Oswald, F.L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B.H., Ramsay, L.J., & Gillespie, M.A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187-207.
22.
Rigol, G.W. (2004). Selection through individualized review. Retrieved December 21, 2006, from http://www.collegeboard.com/research/home/
23.
Rowe, D.C. (2005). Under the skin: On the impartial treatment of genetic and environmental hypotheses of racial differences. American Psychologist, 60(1), 60-70.
24.
Rushton, J.P., & Jensen, A.R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
25.
Sedlacek, W.E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Stemler, S.E., Grigorenko, E.L., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Using the theory of successful intelligence as a basis for augmenting AP exams in psychology and statistics . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 344-376.
27.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
28.
Sternberg, R.J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
29.
Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices, and outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology , 20(2), 6-18.
30.
Sternberg, R.J. (2005). Accomplishing the goals of affirmative action-with or without affirmative action. Change, 37(1), 6-13.
31.
Sternberg, R.J. (2006). How can we simultaneously enhance both academic excellence and diversity? College and University, 81(1), 17-23.
32.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Sternberg, R.J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P.R., & Grigorenko, E.L. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model . Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 129-137.
34.
Sternberg, R.J., Forsythe, G.B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W.M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life . New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
36.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (2002). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 1-11.
38.
Sternberg, R.J., & the Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2005). Augmenting the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. In W. Camara & E. Kimmel (Eds.), Choosing students: Higher education admission tools for the 21st century (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Sternberg, R.J., & the Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321-350.
40.
Sternberg, R.J., the Rainbow Project Collaborators, & the University of Michigan Business School Project Collaborators (2004). Theory based university admissions testing for a new millennium. Educational Psychologist, 39(3), 185-198.
41.
Sternberg, R.J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E.L. (1998a). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 667-669.
42.
Sternberg, R.J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E.L. (1998b). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 374-384.
43.
Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D'Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I.I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science , 14, 623-628.
45.
Vernon, P.E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
