Proponents of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) hail it as vital legislation that supports a civil rights agenda because of explicit recognition that achievement gaps are unacceptable. One way to make sense of NCLB's impact on school divisions and to understand whether NCLB recognizes the complexity of why minority and low-socioeconomic-background students often struggle in schools is to look through the lens of superintendents. District leaders, as moral agents, are tone setters for change in schools and negotiators and enactors of state and federal policies. This study explores how NCLB has affected achievement gaps in Virginia and not only investigates how superintendents have made sense of the federal legislation but also seeks out strategies employed by district leaders that target minority groups and the elimination of the achievement gap. Critical race theory allows consideration of superintendent perspectives across issues such as race, racism, poverty, class, power, test scores, and dominant assumptions.
Ashbaugh, C.R. (2000). The superintendent's role as instructional leader . In P. M. Short & J. P. Scribner (Eds.), Case studies of the superintendency (pp. 9-21). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow .
2.
Bainbridge, W.L., & Lasley, T.J. (2002). Demographics, diversity, and K-12 accountability: The challenge of closing the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 34(4), 422-437.
3.
Bell, D. (1995). Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 5-19). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Bernal, D.D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical race-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105-126.
5.
Bjork, L. (1993). Effective schools-effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of School Leadership, 3(3), 246-259.
6.
Bjork, L., & Gurley, D.K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Bjork & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 163-186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Bjork, L., Lindle, J., & Van Meter, E. (1999). A summing up. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 657-663.
8.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and method. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Brunner, C., Grogan, M., & Bjork, L. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy (Ed.), NSSE yearbook (pp. 211-238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Chang, R.S. (1995). Toward an Asian American legal scholarship: Critical race theory, post-structuralism, and narrative space. In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 354-368). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). From "separate but equal" to "No Child Left Behind": The collision of new standards on old inequalities. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 3-32). Boston: Beacon.
12.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
13.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press .
14.
Department of Education. (2000). Guidelines for uniform performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers, administrators, and superintendents. Richmond, VA: Author.
15.
Duke, D.L., & Reck, B.L. (2003). The evolution of educational accountability in the Old Dominion. In D. Duke, M. Grogan, P. Tucker, & W. Heinecke (Eds.), Educational leadership in an age of accountability: The Virginia experience (pp. 36-68). New York: State University of New York Press.
16.
Easley, J. (2005). The political tension of education as a public good: The voice of a Martin Luther King, Jr., scholar. Education and Urban Society, 37(4), 490-505.
17.
Ferguson, R.F. (2003). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460-507.
18.
Fusarelli, L.D. (2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18(1), 71-94.
19.
Gatto, J.T. (1991). Dumbing us down: The hidden curriculum of compulsory schooling. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society.
20.
Grogan, M. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 117-142.
21.
Grogan, M., & Blackmon, M. (2001). A superintendent's approach to coalition building: Working with diversity to garner support far educational initiatives. In C. Brunner & L. Bjork (Eds.), The new superintendency (pp. 169-182). Amsterdam: JAI.
22.
Grogan, M., & Sherman, W.H. (2003). How superintendents in Virginia deal with the Black-White test-score gap. In D. Duke , M. Grogan, P. Tucker, & W. Heinecke (Eds.), Educational leadership in an age of accountability: The Virginia experience (pp. 155-180). New York: State University of New York Press.
23.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
24.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
25.
Haney Lopez, I.F. (1995). The social construction of race. In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 191-203). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
Hernstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
27.
Herrington, C.D. (1993). Accountability, invisibility and the politics of numbers: School report cards and race. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender: The 1992 yearbook of the politics of education association (pp. 203-217). Washington, DC: Falmer.
28.
Hunter, R.C., & Bartee, R. (2003). The achievement gap: Issues of competition, class, and race. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 151-160.
29.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
30.
Johnston, R., & Viadero, D. (2000, March 15). Unmet promise: Raising minority achievement . Education Week, pp. 1-8.
31.
Kowalski, T. (1999). The school superintendent. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
32.
Kowalski, T.J. (2005). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G. Bjork & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Kowalski, T.J., Petersen, G.J., & Fusarelli, L.D. (2005, November). Facing an uncertain future: An investigation of the preparation and readiness of first-time superintendents to lead in a democratic society. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration , Nashville, TN.
34.
Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.
35.
LeCompte, M.P., & Preissle, J. (1993). The role of theory in the research process. In Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (pp. 116-157). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
Lewis, A. (2001). There is no "race" in the schoolyard: Color-blind ideology in an (almost) all-White school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 781-811.
37.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Lipman, P. (1998). Race, class, and power in school restructuring . Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Lopez, G.R. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 39(1), 68-94.
40.
Malen, B., & Rice, J.K. (2004). A framework for assessing the impact of education reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. Educational Policy, 18(5), 631-660.
41.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Miller, L.S. (1995). An American imperative: Accelerating minority educational advancement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Petersen, G.J., & Barnett, B.G. (2005). The superintendent as instructional leader: Current practice, future conceptualizations, and implications for preparation. In L. G. Bjork & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 107-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Rezai-Rashti, G. (1995). Multicultural education, anti-racist education, and critical pedagogy: Reflections on every day practice. In R. Ng, J. Scane, & P. Staton (Eds.), Anti-racism, feminism and critical approaches to education (pp. 3-19). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
47.
Ridenour, C.S., Lasley, T.J., & Bainbridge, W.L. (2001). The impact of emerging market-based public policy on urban schools and a democratic society. Education and Urban Society, 34(1), 66-83.
48.
Roberts, S.M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2003). Schools as professional learning communities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Scheurich, J.J., & Young, M.D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
50.
Shibles, M., Rallis, S., & Deck, L. (2001). A new political balance between superintendent and board: Clarifying purpose and generating knowledge. In C. Brunner & L. Bjork (Eds.), The new superintendency (pp. 169-182). Amsterdam: JAI.
51.
Singham, M. (1998). The canary in the mine: The achievement gap between Black and White students. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(1), 8-15.
52.
Sizer, T.R. (2004). Preamble: A reminder for Americans. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. xvii-xxii). Boston: Beacon.
53.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J.J., Garcia, J., & Nolly, G. (2004). Equity audits: A practical leadership tool for developing equitable and excellent schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 133-161.
54.
Solorzano, D.G., & Yosso, T.J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23-44.
55.
Trumbell, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., & Greenfield, P.M. (2001). Bridging cultures in our schools: New approaches that work. San Francisco: WestEd.
56.
Viadero, D. (2000, March 22). Lags in minority achievement defy traditional expectations. Education Week, pp. 1-8.
57.
Wills, F., & Peterson, K. (1995). Superintendents' management of state-initiated reform: A matter of interpretation. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education (pp. 85-116). New York: State University of New York Press.
58.
Wood, G. (2004a). Introduction. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. vii-xvi). Boston: Beacon.
59.
Wood, G. (2004b). A view from the field: NCLB's effects on classrooms and schools. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 33-52). Boston: Beacon.
60.
Young, M.D., & Laible, J. (2000). White racism, antiracism, and school leadership preparation. Journal of School Leadership, 10(5), 374-415.
61.
Zernike, K. (2000, August 4). Racial gap in student test scores polarizes town. New York Times, pp. A1,A25.
