Recent work on distributed leadership extends an ongoing critique of conventional “heroic” leader portrayals. This article examines work in this area seeking implications for democratic school governance. With material from case studies of two Texas schools, it considers frameworks presented by Spillane, Halverson, and Diamond and by Firestone and Heller. Invoking critical perspectives, it problematizes a conventional managerial slant in the frameworks. The frameworks direct attention to a wider distribution of leadership than is often portrayed. Unfortunately, the frameworks attend primarily to administrative concerns, namely the steering of local actors and channeling of local activity and are largely silent about the politics of distributed leadership. Reconsidering the nature and dynamics of leadership in the two cases, we find broader notions of performance and attention to more deliberative community-building activity reveal the importance of distributed leadership in engendering responsiveness to and reciprocal accountability with local stakeholders.
Anderson, G. L. (1996). The cultural politics of schools: Implications for leadership. In K. Leithwoodet al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 947-962). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
2.
Anderson, G. L. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary practice: Appropriating Foucault’s view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 329.
3.
Anderson, G. L. (1999). The politics of participatory reforms in education. Theory Into Practice, 38(4), 191-195.
4.
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York: Methuen.
5.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Management as moral technology. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 153-167). New York: Routledge.
6.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
7.
Bates, R. J. (1980). Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 1-20.
8.
Bates, R. J. (1987). Corporate culture, schooling, and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23, 79-115.
9.
Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. New York: Cassell.
10.
Bottery, M. (1996). The challenge to professionals from the new public management: Implications for the teaching profession. Oxford Review of Education, 22(2), 179-197.
11.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. (2004). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of two elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347-373.
13.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
14.
Crow, G. M., & Grogan, M. (2005). The development of leadership thought and practice in the United States. In F. English (Ed.), Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (pp. 362-379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Firestone, W. A. (1996). Leadership roles or functions? In K. Leithwoodet al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 395-418). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16.
Fliegel, S. (1990). Creative non-compliance. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (pp. 199-216). New York: Falmer.
17.
Foster, W. P. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
18.
Fuhrman, S. H. (1990). Diversity amidst standardization: State differential treatment of districts. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (pp. 251-282). New York: Falmer.
19.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
21.
Goldring, E., B., & Sullivan, A. V. (1996). Beyond the boundaries: Principals, parents, and communities shaping the school environment. In K. Leithwoodet al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 195-224). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
22.
Goldstein, J. (2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(2), 173-197.
23.
Greenfield, T. B. (1984). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and nonnatural order in organizations. In J. E. Corbally (Ed.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 142-169). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
25.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
26.
Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Sage.
27.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
28.
Halverson, R. (in press). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
29.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility. School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324.
30.
Heller, M. F., & Firestone, W. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change. Elementary School Journal, 96, 65-86.
31.
High, C. S. (2002). The micropolitics of faculty-led reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
32.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
33.
Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (1981). Substitutes for leadership: Test of a construct. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 714-728.
34.
Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
35.
Kaboolian, L. (1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 189-193.
36.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375-403.
37.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 45-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
38.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Littler, C. R. (1978). Understanding Taylorism. The British Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 185-202.
40.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Malen, B. (1994). Enacting site-based management: A political utilities approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 249-267.
42.
Maxcy, B. D. (2004). Emerging democracy in an urban elementary school: A Habermasian framework for examining school governance reculturing in response to systemic reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
43.
Mayrowetz, D., & Weinstein, C. S. (1999). Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 423-449.
44.
Nguyen, T. S. T. (in press). Politics of place: Managing linguistic difference through a population specific (Vietnamese) program within and against one public elementary school. Unpublished doctoral disseration, University of Texas at Austin.
45.
Ogawa, R. T. (1996). Bridging and buffering relations between parents and schools. UCEA Review, 37(2), 2-13.
46.
Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224-243.
47.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48.
Pang, V. O., Kiang, P. N., & Pak, Y. K. (2004). Asian Pacific American students: Challenging a biased educational system. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 542-563). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Pitner, N. J. (1986). Substitutes for principal leadership behavior: An exploratory study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 23-42.
50.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
51.
Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
52.
Pounder, D. G., Ogawa, R. T., & Adams, E. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 564-588.
53.
Ruiz de Velasco, J. (2005). Performance-based school reforms and the federal role in helping schools that serve language-minority students. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latino youth. Albany: State University of New York Press.
54.
Sawyer, R. K., Scribner, J. P., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2005). Talking leadership: Conversation analysis and distributed leadership. In W. Hoy & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
55.
Schwandt, T. A. (1993). Theory and concepts in qualitative research: Perspectives from the field. In D. J. Flinders & G. E. Mills (Eds.), Theory and concepts in qualitative research: Perspectives from the field (pp. 5-23). New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2004, November). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, Kansas City, MO.
57.
Sebring, P. B., Hallman, S., & Smylie, M. (2003, April). When distributed leadership is called back. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
58.
Sloan, K. (2005). Playing to the logic of the Texas accountability system: How focusing on “ratings”—not children—undermines quality and equity. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 153-178). Albany: State University of New York Press.
59.
Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. 101st yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 163-188). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
60.
Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69, 143-150.
62.
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(5), 533-543.
63.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
64.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
65.
Terry, L. D. (1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 194-200.
66.
Texas Education Agency. (1996). The development of accountability systems nationwide and in Texas (Statewide Texas Educational Progress Study No. 1). Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
67.
Thai, H. C. (1999). “Splitting things in half is so White!”: Conceptions of family life and friendship and the formation of ethnic identity among second generation Vietnamese Americans. Amerasia Journal, 25(1), 53-88.
68.
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
70.
Tosi, H. L., & Kiker, S. (1997). Commentary on “Substitutes for Leadership.”Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 109-113.
71.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
Valencia, R. R., & Villareal, B. J. (2005). Texas’ second wave of high-stakes testing: Antisocial promotion legislation, grade retention, and adverse impact on minorities. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 113-152). Albany: State University of New York Press.
73.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York.
74.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
75.
Weiler, H. N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(4), 433-448.
76.
Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2003). Making sense of education reform: Global and national influences. In C. A. Torres & A. Antikainen (Eds.), The international handbook on the sociology of education: An international assessment of new research and theory (pp. 305-324). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
77.
Williams, M. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D. (1988). A preliminary analysis of the construct validity of Kerr and Jermier’s “Substitutes for Leadership” scales. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 307-333.
78.
Woods, P. A. (2004). Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3-26.
79.
Young, M. D., & Lopez, G. R. (2005). The nature of inquiry in educational leadership. In F. English (Ed.), Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (pp. 337-361). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
Yukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
