America’s high school students have higher educational aspirations than ever before, yet these aspirations are being undermined by disconnected educational systems and other barriers. These educational aspirations cut across racial and ethnic lines with scant differences. As this study demonstrates, access to college-preparation-related policy information, however, follows racial, ethnic, income, and curricular tracking lines. This article presents findings from Stanford University’s Bridge Project—a national study that examined (a) K-16 policies and practices and (b) student, parent, teacher, counselor, and administrator understandings of those policies and practices in regions in California, Illinois, Georgia, Maryland, Oregon, and Texas. In addition, it proposes recommendations for K-12 schools, postsecondary institutions, state agencies, and the federal government.
Adelman, C. (1994). Lessons of a generation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
American Council on Education. (2002). Access and persistence. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Anyon, J. (1990, Winter). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67-92.
4.
Barton, P. (2002). The closing of the education frontier. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
5.
Bishop, J. (1990). Incentives for learning: Why American high school students compare so poorly to their counterparts overseas. Research in Labor Economics, 11, 17-51.
6.
Bracco, K. R., & Kirst, M. W. (2004). How the K-12 and postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In M. Kirst & A. Venezia (Eds.), From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in post-secondary education (pp. 1-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2001). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
8.
Education Trust. (1998). Improving achievement and closing the gap, K-16. Presentation to Institute on Education Reform, Washington, DC.
9.
Education Trust. (1999). Ticket to nowhere: The gap between leaving high school and entering college and high performance jobs. In Thinking K-16, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Fuhrman, S. H., & O’Day, J. (1996). Motivating students to learn: An American dilemma. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 19-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Grubb, W. N. (1999). Learning and earning in the middle: The economic benefits of sub-baccalaureate education. New York: Community College Research Center.
12.
Henry, G. T., & Rubenstein, R. (2002). Paying for grades. Journal of Policy Management and Analysis, 21(1), 96.
13.
Hodgkinson, H. (1999). All one system: A second look. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
14.
Hossler, D., & Stage, F. K. (1992, Summer). Family and high school experience influences on the postsecondary educational plans of ninth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 425-451.
15.
Kirst, M. (1998). Improving and aligning K-16 standards, admissions, and freshman placement policies. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
16.
Kirst, M., & Venezia, A. (2001, September). Bridging the great divide between secondary schools and postsecondary education. Phi Delta Kappan, 92-97.
17.
Le, V.-N., & Robyn, A. (2001). Alignment among secondary and post-secondary assessments (A report for Stanford University’s Bridge Project). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
18.
Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1988). Curriculum tracking as mediating the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 61(2), 78-94.
19.
Maeroff, G. I., Callan, P. M., & Usdan, M. D. (2001). Learning connection: New partnerships between schools and colleges. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
McDonough, P., Korn, J., & Yamaski, E. (1997). Access, equity and the privatization of college counseling. Review of Higher Education, 20(3), 297-317.
21.
McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
Mortenson, T. (1998). Freshman-to-sophomore persistence rates by institutional control, academic selectivity and degree level, 1983 to 1998. Postsecondary Education Opportunity, Oskaloosa, IA.
23.
Mow, S. L., & Nettles, M. T. (1990). Minority student access to, and persistence and performance in, college. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 35-105). New York: Agathon.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). National Education Longitudinal Study: 1988-1994: Descriptive summary report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25.
Oakes, J. (1992, May). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 12-21.
26.
Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1991). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, consequences, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
27.
Orfield, G., & Paul, F. G. (1994). High hopes, long odds: A major report on Hoosier teens and the American dream. Indianapolis: Indiana Youth Institute.
28.
Powell, A. G. (1996). Motivating students to learn: An American dilemma. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 19-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Rosenbaum, J. (1999). Unrealistic plans and misdirected efforts: Are community colleges getting the right message to students? (Policy brief for the Community College Research Center). New York: Community College Research Center.
30.
Rosenbaum, J. (2001). College for all. New York: Russell Sage.
31.
Schneider, B., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33.
Timpane, P. M. (1998). Higher education and the schools. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). CPS annual demographic survey, March supplement. Available at http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032001/perinc/new03_001.htm
35.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001a). Condition of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001b). Projections of education statistics to 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
