What program components might enhance our effectiveness in promoting college access for all students? This article considers five bridges along students’ pathways to college: family involvement, culturally enriched teaching, counseling, mentoring, and peers. Longitudinal case studies of Puente students highlight how these bridges function along Latino students’pathways to their college and career aspirations. Bridges often extended beyond high school to support students’college enrollment, transfer, and retention. A developmental model and prototype database are proposed for both qualitative case studies and variable-based analyses of bridges across students’worlds, family demographics, college and career aspirations, math and English pathways, and college admission and enrollment. Developmental models and longitudinal research can help outreach programs such as Puente strengthen bridges along multiple pathways to college and careers. As these tools advance science, policy, and practices, they can also transformacademic pipelines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Azmitia, M.
, & Cooper, C. R. (2001). Good or bad? Peers and academic pathways of Latino and European American youth in schools and community programs. Journal for the Education of Students Placed at Risk, 6, 45-71.
2.
Azmitia, M.
, Cooper, C. R., Garcia, E. E., & Dunbar, N. (1996). The ecology of family guidance in low-income Mexican-American and European-American families. Social Development, 5, 1-23.
3.
Cazden, C. B.
(2002). A descriptive study of six High School Puente classrooms. Educational Policy, 16, 496-521.
4.
Cooper, C. R.
(1999). When diversity works: Formative evaluation of student outreach, UC System-regional partnerships, and student pathways through college. Santa Cruz: University of California Office of the President Outreach Evaluation Advisory Committee.
5.
Cooper, C. R.
(2001). Bridging multiple worlds: Inclusive, selective, and competitive programs, Latino youth, and pathways to college. Affirmative development of ethnic minority students. The CEIC Review: A Catalyst for Merging Research, Policy, and Practice, 9, 14-15, 22-22.
6.
Cooper, C. R.
, Azmitia, M., Garcia, E. E., Ittel, A., Lopez, E. M., Rivera, L., et al. (1994). Shifting aspirations of low-income Mexican American and European American parents. In F. A. Villaruel & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Environments for socialization and learning: New directions in child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Cooper, C. R.
, Cooper, R. G., Azmitia, M., Chavira, G., & Gullatt, Y. (2002). Bridging multiple worlds: How African American and Latino youth in academic outreach programs navigate math pathways to college. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 73-87.
8.
Cooper, C. R.
, Jackson, J. F., Azmitia, M., Lopez, E., & Dunbar, N. (1995). Bridging students’multiple worlds: African American and Latino youth in academic outreach programs. In R. F. Macías & R. G. García Ramos (Eds.), Changing schools for changing students: An anthology of research on language minorities (pp. 211-234). Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
9.
Davenport, E. C.
, Davison, M. L., Kuang, H., Ding, S., Kim, S., & Kwak, N. (1998). High school mathematics course-takingby gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 497-514.
10.
Domínguez, E., Cooper, C. R., Chavira, G., Mena, D., Lopez, E. M., Dunbar, N., et al. (2001). It's all about choices/Se trata de todas las decisiones: Activities to build identity pathways to college and careers. Retrieved online at http://www.bridgingworlds.org
11.
Edgert, P.
, & Taylor, J. W. (1992). Final report on the effectiveness of intersegmental student preparation programs: The third report to the Legislature in response to Item 6420-0011-001 of the 1988-89 Budget Act. Sacramento: California Postsecondary Education Commission.
12.
Erickson, R.
, & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Gándara, P.
(2002). A study of High School Puente: What we have learned about preparing Latino youth for postsecondary education. Educational Policy, 16, 474-495.
14.
Gándara, P.
(in press). The Puente Program. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
Gándara, P.
, & Bial, D. (2001). Paving the way to higher education: K-12 Intervention programs for underrepresented youth. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
16.
Gándara, P.
, Larson, K., Mehan, H., & Rumberger, R. (1998). Capturing Latino students in the academic pipeline (Report No. 1). Sacramento, CA: Chicano/Latino Policy Project.
17.
Hayward, G. C.
, Brandes, B. G., Kirst, M. W., & Mazzeo, C. (1997). Higher education outreach programs: A synthesis of evaluations. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
18.
Latino Eligibility Task Force
. (1993). Latino student eligibility and participation in the University of California: Report number two of the Latino Eligibility Task Force. Santa Cruz: University of California.
19.
Mehan, H.
, Hubbard, L., Villanueva, I., & Lintz, A. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of placing underachieving students in high track classes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Oakes, J.
(2001). Research to make a difference. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
21.
Perna, L. W.
, & Swail, W. S. (2001). Pre-college outreach and early intervention. Thought and Action: The NEA Higher Education Journal, 27, 99-110.
22.
Pradl, G. M.
(2002). Linking in structional intervention and professional development: Usingthe ideas behind Puente high school English to inform educational policy. Educational Policy, 16, 522-546.
23.
Public/Private Ventures
. (1996). Mentoring: A synthesis of P/PV’s research: 1988-1995. Philadelphia: Author.
24.
Reese, L.
, Balzano, S., Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (1995). The concept of educación: Latino family values and American schooling. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 57-81.
25.
Rhodes, J. E.
, Grossman, J. B., & Resche, N. L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’academic adjustment. Child Development, 71, 1662-1671.
26.
Smith, M. P.
(1985). Early identification and support: The University of California—Berkeley’s MESA Program. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. College-School Collaboration: Appraising the Major Approaches, 24, 19-25.
27.
U.S. Department of Education
. (1988). Education and Title VI: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs or activities which receive federal financial assistance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights.
