Diversity or Desegregation? Implications of Arguments for Diversity in K-12 and Higher Education

Abstract

Advocates of race-conscious admissions and attendance policies at the K-12 and postsecondary levels have recently emphasized the argument that public education authorities have a "compelling interest" in maintaining racially, ethnically, and economically diverse learning environments. Unlike earlier calls for integration, which rested on constitutional guarantees of equal protection, the diversity argument emphasizes educational benefits and thus is sensitive to differences in educational contexts. One problem with framing educational equity issues in terms of diversity is that sometimes, diversity is understood in ways that do not enhance educational quality or opportunity. The case that diversity enhances the quality of education must be made in a manner specific to the K-12 context, with reference to the states' constitutional guarantees of public education. This article explores the connections between the diversity arguments currently being made in higher education and K-12 contexts, drawing evidence from federal case law and recent desegregation-related policies in Connecticut.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armor, D. A. (1995). Forced justice: School desegregation and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bowen, W. G. , & Bok, D. (with Shulman, J. L. , Nygren, T. I. , Dale, S. B. , & Meserve, L. A. ). (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Brewer v. West Irondequoit Central School District, 212 F.3d 738 (2nd Cir. 2000).

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 57 F. Supp. 2d 228 (W.D. N. Car. 1999).

Carter, S. L. (1991). Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.

Coleman, A. L. (2000, April). Diversity in higher education: Addressing the real questions regarding the use of race or national origin in admissions decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Connecticut Public Act 93-263 (1993).

Connecticut Public Act 97-290 (1997).

10.

Connecticut State Department of Education. (1999). Strategic school profiles [Online]. Available: http://www.csde.state.ct.us/public/der/datacentral/ssp/ssp_frameset.htm

11.

The constitutionality of race-conscious admissions programs in public elementary and secondary schools . (1999). Harvard Law Review, 112, 940-957.

12.

Farkas, S. , & Johnson, J. (1998). Time to move on: African American and White parents set an agenda for public schools. New York: Public Agenda.

13.

Gorman, S. (2000, April 8). After affirmative action. National Journal, pp. 1120-1124.

14.

Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 (1968).

15.

Gurin, P. (1999). Expert report of Patricia Gurin [Online]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available: http://www.umich.edu/-urel/admissions/legal/expert/gurintoc.html

16.

Hochschild, J. (1997). Is school desegregation still a viable policy option? PS: Political Science and Politics, 30, 458-466.

17.

Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996).

18.

Hurtado, S. , Milem, J. F. , Clayton-Pedersen, A. R. , & Allen, W. R. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity through educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21(3), 279-302.

19.

Hurtado, S. , Milem, J. F. , Clayton-Pedersen, A. R. , & Allen, W. R. (1999). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the campus climate for racial/ethnic diversity (ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Reports Series, Vol. 28, No. 6). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

20.

Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.

21.

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1949).

22.

Milem, J. R , & Chang, M. (2000, April). Empirical evidence regarding the educational benefits of diversity in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

23.

Natriello, G. (1993). A descriptive study of the educational resources of the Hartford public schools and disparities with other districts (Paper prepared for the plaintiffs in Sheff v. O'Neill). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 290)

24.

Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.

25.

Reeher, G. (1996). Narratives of justice: Legislators' beliefs about distributive fairness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

26.

Regents of the University of Michigan. (2000). The compelling need for diversity in higher education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

27.

Schimmel, D. (1996, December 26). Is Bakke still good law? The Fifth Circuit says no and out-laws affirmative action admissions. West's Education Law Reporter, pp. 1052-1068.

28.

Sheff v. O'Neill, 238 Conn. 1, 678 A.2d 1267 (1996).

29.

State of Connecticut. (2000). Constitution of the state of Connecticut [Online]. Available: http://www.sots.state.ct.us/registermanual/sectioni/ctconstit.htm

30.

Swann v. Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971).

31.

Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950).

32.

University of California Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).

33.

Verstegan, D. A. , & Whitney, T. (1997). From courthouses to schoolhouses: Emerging judicial theories of adequacy and equity. Educational Policy, 11, 330-352.

34.

Wessmann v. Gittens, 160 F.3d 790 (1st Cir. 1998).