The goal of this study is to bring the discussion of ethnic heterogeneity and the racial/ethnic classification of students for research purposes into the education policy arena. The relationship between race and ethnicity and academic achievement is focused on in particular. The heterogeneity of academic performance in reading and math is demonstrated between subgroups of Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Island students, using the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS ’88). In the case of both the Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Island aggregate groups there are substantial, though not always statistically significant, academic performance differences among ethnic subgroups, with a range of math performance among Hispanic subgroups of 10.7 points (mean score = 34.4) between Cuban and Puerto Rican students and a range of math performance among Asian/Pacific Island students of 15.3 points (mean score = 41.0) between West Asian and Pacific Island students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bryk, A. S.
, & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Coleman, J. S.
, Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfield, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare.
3.
Cooper, B. S.
, Cilo, M. R., & Baker, B. D. (2000). Bridging the gap between school and college: An analysis of K-16 education in New York City. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
4.
Dawson, M.
(1987). Minority student performance: Is the Montessori magnet school effective? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 309 881)
5.
Donato, K. M.
, & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1996). The educational achievement of U.S. Puerto Ricans. New England Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), 99-111.
6.
Fuller, E. J.
(1994).Trust as the basis for urban school reform and as an explanation of the variability in involuntary minority academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
7.
Gamoran, A.
, Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., White, P. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325-338.
8.
Gibson, M. A.
, & Ogbu, J. U. (1991). Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities. New York: Garland.
9.
Hamilton, L. S.
(1998). Gender differences on high school science achievement tests: Do format and content matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 179-195.
10.
Kim, H.
(1997). Diversity among Asian American high school students. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
11.
Klein, S. P.
, Javanovic, J., & Comfort, K. (1997). Gender and racial/ethnic differences on performance assessments in science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 83-98.
12.
Marin, G.
, & Marin, B. V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations (Applied Social Science Research Method Series, Vol. 23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Miller, S. R.
(1998) Shortcut: High school grades as a signal of human capital. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(4), 299-311.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics
. (1990). User’s manual: Nels: 88 base year student component (NCES-90464). Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Neisser, U.
(1986). The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Nieto, S.
(1991). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education.New York: Longman.
17.
Raudenbush, S. W.
, Fotiu, R. P., & Cheong, Y. F. (1998). Inequality of access to educational resources: A national report card for eighth-grade math. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(4), 253-267.
18.
Reyhner, J.
(1989). Changes in American Indian education: A historical retrospective for educators in the United States. Washington, DC: The Office of Education Research and Improvement.
19.
Sellars, M.
, & Weis, L. (Eds.) (1997). Beyond Black and White: New faces and voices in U.S. schools. Albany: State University of New York.
20.
Sleeter, C.
, & Grant, C. (1993). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
21.
Suzuki, B. H.
(1995). Education and the socialization of Asian Americans: A revisionist analysis of the “model minority” thesis. In D. T. Nakanishi & T. Y. Nishida (Eds.), The Asian American educational experience: A source book for teachers and students (pp. 113-132). New York: Routledge.
22.
Taylor, C.
(1997). Does money matter? An empirical study introducing resource costs and student needs to education production function analysis. In W. Fowler (Ed.), Developments in school finance: 1997 (pp. 75-97). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
Trueba, H. T.
(1992). Many groups, one people: The meaning and significance of multicultural education in modern America. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(3/4), 91-116.
24.
Vigil, J. D.
(1997). Personas Mexicanas: Chicano high schoolers in a changing Los Angeles. Case studies in cultural anthropology. Fort Worth, TX: Hartcourt Brace.
25.
Wang, J.
(1998). Opportunity to learn: The impacts and policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 137-156.
26.
Weinberg, M.
(1977). Minority students: A research appraisal. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 137 483)
27.
Wilson, C.
(1994). Promoting an image: A Vietnamese success strategy through history. Opinion paper. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 392 862)
