Charter School Accountability: Problems and Prospects

Abstract

Today, public school accountability depends mostly on compliance. This accountability-via-regulation will only make charter public schools like district public schools. A different approach to charter accountability is envisioned, designed to help these schools succeed as genuine education alternatives. This accountability-via-transparency is based on giving charter schools operational, financial, and program autonomy in exchange for holding them accountable for results. Furthermore, rather than bureaucratic control from higher levels within the system, charter accountability is propelled mostly by public marketplaces in which a school’s clients and stakeholders reward its successes, punish its failures, and send it signals about what must change. In what follows, approaches to accountability in today’s charter world are reviewed; how a transparent charter accountability system following Generally Accepted Accountability Principles for Education (GAAPE) would work for charter schools, their sponsors, and statewide programs is described; and three accountability dilemmas that charter schools face are discussed in the conclusion.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelman, C. , Elmore, R. (1999). When accountability knocks, will anyone answer? Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Association for Performance-Based Accreditation . (1998). Mission statement and services.

Center for Education Reform . (1999). Charter schools: A progress report—the closures. Washington, DC: Author.

Finn, C. E., Jr. , Manno, B. V. , & Bierlein, L. A. (1996). Charter schools in action: What have we learned? Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.

Finn, C. E., Jr. , Manno, B. V. , Bierlein, L. A. , & Vanourek, G. (1997). Charter schools in action: Final report. Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.

Finn, C. E., Jr. , Manno, B. V. , & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fuhrman, S. H. (1999, January). The new accountability: CPRE policy briefs. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

Hill, P. , Lake, R. , & Celio, M. B. (1999). A study of charter school accountability. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Reinvention of Public Education.

Hill, P. , Pierce, L. , & Lake, R. (1998). How are public charter schools held accountable? Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Reinvention of Public Education.

10.

Hill, P. , Pierce, L. , Lake, R. , & Herdman, P. (1998). Charter schools: Accountability for results. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Reinvention of Public Education.

11.

Innerst, C. (1999, December 19). Loss of mandate rare among charter schools. Washington Times, p. A1-A1.

12.

Manno, B. V. (1999). Accountability: The key to charter renewal. Washington, DC: Center for Education Reform.

13.

Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Reforming and conforming: NASDC principals discuss school accountability systems. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

14.

National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment. (1999). Retrieved June, 6, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.uscharterschools.org/tech-assist/ed-initiatives.htm

15.

Newman, F. M. , King, M. B. , & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 41-74.

16.

Project ACHIEVE. (1999). Imagine what your school could achieve [Online]. Retrieved June, 6, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.projectachieve.com

17.

RPP International (2000). The state of charter schools: Fourth-year report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.