In 1988, the Education Reform Act enabled all parents in England and Wales to express a preference for any school for their child. This created a market-like situation within which school survival depended on a regular supply of students. Previous studies in the United Kingdom have suggested that this would lead to increasing socioeconomic segregation between schools. In contrast, the investigation reported here found that segregation has declined in several respects since 1988. The study uses school-level data relating to free school meals (FSM), ethnicity, first language, and special needs for every school in England and Wales. All indicators at each level of aggregation are in agreement. Student segregation between schools has decreased over time. There is little evidence that this powerful social movement is related to market forces, and some indications are presented here that although markets have not caused segregation, they do not seem to be causing the desegregation either
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambler, J.
(1997). Who benefits from educational choice? Some evidence from Europe. In E. Cohn (Ed.), Market approaches to education (pp. 353-380). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
2.
Archbald, D.
(1996). Measuring school choice using indicators. Education Policy, 10(1), 88-101.
3.
Bagley, C.
, & Woods, P. (1998). School choice, markets, and special educational needs. Disability and Society, 13(5), 763-783.
4.
Ball, S.
, & Gewirtz, S. (1997). Is research possible? A rejoinder to Tooley's "On school choice and social class."British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, 4.
5.
Blair, M.
(1994). Black teachers, Black students, and education markets. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 277-291.
6.
Bourdieu, P.
(1997). The forms of capital. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Wells (Eds.), Education culture, economy, and society (pp. 46-58). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Bowe, R.
, Ball, S., & Gerwirtz, S. (1994). Parental choice, consumption, and social theory: The operation of micromarkets in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(1), 38-52.
8.
Chubb, J.
, & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
9.
Conway, S.
(1997). The reproduction of exclusion and disadvantage: Symbolic violence and social class inequalities in parental choice of secondary education. Sociological Research On-line, 2, 4.
10.
Cookson, P.
(1994). School choice. London: Yale University Press.
11.
Coons, J.
, & Sugarman, S. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
David, M.
, West, A., & Ribbens, J. (1994). Mother's intuition? Choosing secondary schools. East Sussex, UK: Falmer Press.
13.
Department for Education
. (1993). Statistics of education: Schools 1992. London: Author.
14.
Department for Education
. (1994). Statistics of education: Schools 1993. London: Author.
15.
Department for Education
. (1995). Statistics of education: Schools in England 1994. London: HMSO.
16.
Department for Education and Employment
. (1996). Statistics of education: Schools in England 1995. London: HMSO.
17.
Department for Education and Employment
. (1997). Statistics of education: Schools in England 1996. London: HMSO.
18.
Department for Education and Employment
. (1998a). Statistics of education: Schools in England 1997. London: HMSO.
19.
Department for Education and Employment
. (1998b). Statistics of education: Schools in England 1998. London: HMSO.
20.
Department of Education and Science
. (1990). Statistics of education: Schools 1989. London: Author.
21.
Department of Education and Science
. (1991). Statistics of education: Schools 1990. London: Author.
22.
Department of Education and Science
. (1992). Statistics of education: Schools 1991. London: Author.
23.
Echols, F.
, McPherson, A., & Willms, J. (1990). Parental choice in Scotland. Journal of Educational Policy, 5(3), 207-222.
24.
Education authorities directory and annual. (1998). Redhill, UK: The School Government Publishing Company.
25.
Edwards, T.
, Fitz, J., & Whitty, G. (1989). The state and private education: An evaluation of the Assisted Places Scheme. London: Falmer.
26.
Fitz, J.
, Halpin, D., & Power, S. (1993). Education in the market place: Grant maintained schools. London: Kogan Page.
27.
Gewirtz, S.
, Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice, and equity in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
28.
Gibson, A.
, & Asthana, S. (1998). Schools, students, and examination results: Contextualizing school performance. British Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 255-268.
29.
Gibson, A.
, & Asthana, S. (1999). Schools, markets, and equity: Access to secondary education in England and Wales. Presentation at AERA Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
30.
Gibson, A.
, & Asthana, S. (2000). What's in a number?Research Papers in Education, 15, 2.
31.
Gipps, C.
(1993). Policy-making and the use and misuse of evidence. In C. Chitty & B. Simon (Eds.), Education answers back. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
32.
Glatter, R.
, Woods, P., & Bagley, C. (1997). Diversity, differentiation, and hierarchy: School choice and parental preferences. In R. Glatter, P. Woods, & C. Bagley (Eds.), Choice and diversity in schooling: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 7-28). London: Routledge.
33.
Goldring, E.
(1995). Communal opportunities to learn, parental involvement, and school choice: Israel and the United States. Presentation at ESRC/CEPAM Invitation Seminar, Milton Keynes, UK.
34.
Gorard, S.
(1997a). A choice of methods: The methodology of choice. Research in Education, 57, 45-56.
35.
Gorard, S.
(1997b). School choice in an established market. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
36.
Gorard, S.
(1998a). Four errors... and a conspiracy? The effectiveness of schools in Wales. Oxford Review of Education, 24(4), 459-472.
37.
Gorard, S.
(1998b). Social movement in undeveloped markets: An apparent contradiction in education policy studies. Educational Review, 50(3), 249-258.
38.
Gorard, S.
(1999a). Examining the paradox of achievement gaps. Social Research Update, 26, 1-4.
39.
Gorard, S.
(1999b). Keeping a sense of proportion: The politician's error in analyzing school outcomes. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(3), 235-246.
40.
Gorard, S.
(1999c). Well. That about wraps it up for school choice research: A state of the art review. School Leadership and Management, 19(1), 25-47.
41.
Gorard, S.
(2000a). Here we go again: A reply to "What's in a number?" by Gibson and Asthana. Research Papers in Education, 15, 2.
42.
Gorard, S.
(2000b). Education and social justice. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.
43.
Gorard, S.
, & Fitz, J. (1998a). The more things change... the missing impact of marketization. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 365-376.
44.
Gorard, S.
, & Fitz, J. (1998b). Under starters orders: The established market, the Cardiff study, and the Smithfield project. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(3), 299-314.
45.
Gorard, S.
, & Fitz, J. (2000). Investigating the determinants of segregation between schools. Research Papers in Education, 15, 2.
46.
Halsey, A.
, Heath, A., & Ridge, J. (1980). Origins and destinations: Family, class, and education in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
47.
Hatcher, R.
(1998). Class differentiation in education: Rational choices?British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 1.
48.
Hirsch, D.
(1997). What can Britain learn from abroad? In R. Glatter, P. Woods, & C. Bagley (Eds.), Choice and diversity in schooling: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 152-165). London: Routledge.
49.
James, C.
, & Phillips, P. (1995). The practice of educational marketing in schools. Education Management and Administration, 23(2), 75-88.
50.
Kacapyr, E.
(1996). Are you middle-class?American Demographics. Retrieved in 1999 from the World Wide Web: http:llwww.demographics.com
51.
Kluge, G.
(1998). Wealth and people: Inequality measures. Entropy and inequality measures. Retrieved in 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ourworld.compuserve.com
52.
Lauder, H.
, Hughes, D., Watson, S., Waslander, S., Thrupp, M., Strathdee, R., Simiyu, I., Dupuis, A., McGlinn, J., & Hamlin, J. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don't work. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
53.
Lee, V.
, Croninger, R., & Smith, J. (1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 434-457.
54.
Le Grand, J.
, & Bartlett, W. (1993). Quasi-markets and social policy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
55.
Levacic, R.
, & Hardman, J. (1998). Competing for resources: The impact of social disadvantage and other factors on English secondary schools' financial performance. Oxford Review of Education, 24(3), 303-328.
56.
Levacic, R.
, & Hardman, J. (1999). The performance of grant-maintained schools in England: An experiment in school autonomy. Journal of Education Policy.
57.
Levin, B.
, & Riffel, J. (1997). School system responses to external change: Implications for school choice. In R. Glatter, P. Woods, & C. Bagley (Eds.), Choice and diversity in schooling: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 44-58). London: Routledge.
58.
Levin, H.
(1992). Market approaches to education: Vouchers and school choice. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 279-285.
59.
MacGregor, K.
(1999, April 16). Market forces dictating. Times Higher Educational Supplement, 9.
60.
Maynard, A.
(1975). Experiments with choice in education. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
61.
Osborne, D.
, & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinvention of government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume.
62.
Parsons, E.
(1998). Parental choice and the social mix of secondary schools. Presentation at BERA Annual Conference, Belfast, North Ireland.
63.
Reay, D.
(1998). Engendering social reproduction: Mothers in the educational marketplace. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(2), 195-209.
64.
Rees, G.
, Fevre, R., Furlong, J., & Gorard, S. (1997). History, place, and the learning society: Towards a sociology of lifetime learning. Journal of Education Policy, 12(6), 485-497.
65.
Spring, J.
(1982). Dare educators build a new school system? In M. Manley-Casimir (Ed.), Family choice in schooling (p. 33). Toronto: Lexington.
66.
Tooley, J.
(1994). In defense of markets in education. In D. Bridges & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Education and the marketplace. London: Falmer.
67.
Tooley, J.
(1997). On school choice and social class. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, 2.
68.
Waslander, S.
, & Thrupp, M. (1995). Choice, competition, and segregation: An empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary school market, 1990-1993. Journal of Education Policy, 10(1), 1-26.
69.
Waslander, S.
, & Thrupp, M. (1997). Choice, competition, and segregation: An empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary school market, 1990-1993. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Wells (Eds.), Education culture, economy, and society (pp. 439-459). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
Wells, A.
(1995). African-American students' view of school choice. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), School choice: The cultural logic of families, the political rationality of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
71.
White, P.
, Fitz, J., & Gorard, S. (1999). The new legislation on school admissions. (Working Paper 32). Cardiff, UK: School of Social Sciences.
72.
Whitty, G.
, Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
73.
Willms, J.
, & Echols, F. (1992). Alert and inert clients: The Scottish experience of parental choice of schools. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 339-350.
74.
Witte, J.
(1990). Introduction. In W. Clune & J. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education: Vol. 1. The theory of choice and control in education (p. 1). London: Falmer.
75.
Witte, J.
(1998). The Milwaukee voucher experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(4), 229-251.
76.
Woods, P.
, Bagley, C., & Glatter, R. (1997). The public market in England: School responsiveness in a competitive climate. (Occasional Research Paper 1). Milton Keynes, UK: School of Education, Open University.
