This qualitative policy study applies an interactionist framework for policy analysis, especially the concept of intentions, to an examination of the construction of multicultural education policy in a midwestern U.S. school district. Intentions-purposes and goals meant to shape the behavior of actors in the future and at other sites-motivate actors to act in the policy arena, to use policy as a vehicle for realizing their purposes. Initiated in response to a racial conflict in a high school, the policy process entailed the school board's creation of a committee including many African American community members to generate recommendations for improving race relations. During the process, the school board's intentions, and those of many community members, were transformed due to the administration's reinforcement of district conventions and power structures. Race relations became multicultural issues. Community members who misconstrued the process as granting them real policy-making authority were most disappointed with the outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banks, J. A.
(1994). Multiethnic education: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Baumgartner, K.
, Buckley, W., Burns, T., & Schuster, P. (1976). Meta-power and the structuring of social hierarchy. In T. Bums & W. Buckley (Eds.), Social structures and their transformation (pp. 215-288). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Becker, H.
(1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Borman, K.
, Timm, P., Al-amin, Z., & Winston, M. (1992). Using multiple strategies to assess multicultural education in a school district. In C. Grant (Ed.), Research and multicultural education: From the margins to the mainstream (pp. 71-88). London: Falmer.
5.
Clegg, S.
(1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
6.
Cockrell, K. S.
(1996). Communication gatekeeping: A response to mediating conditions in American Indian and school personnel interactions. Journal of School Leadership, 6, 368-398.
7.
Cornbleth, C.
, & Waugh, D. (1993). The great speckled bird: Education policy-in-the-making. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 31-37.
8.
Cornbleth, C.
, & Waugh, D. (1995). The great speckled bird: Multicultural politics and education. New York: St. Martin's.
9.
Curry, B. K.
(1997). Continuity and reform: A new discourse for discussion of change in schools. Educational Planning, 11(1), 21-30.
10.
Estes, C.
, & Edmonds, B. (1981). Symbolic interaction and social policy analysis. Symbolic Interaction, 4(1), 75-86.
11.
Fine, M.
(1997). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power and urban public schools. In A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 460-475). New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Foster, P.
(1990). Policy and practices in multicultural and anti-racist education. London: Routledge.
13.
Glazier, J. D. (1994). Career ladder policy formation and implementation: A symbolic interactionist approach to local policy practices. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia.
14.
Gollnick, D. M.
(1995). National and state initiatives for multicultural education in the United States. In J. A. Banks & C.A.M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 44-64). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
15.
Grant, C.
, & Millar, S. (1992). Research and multicultural education: Barriers, needs and boundaries. In C. Grant (Ed.), Research and multicultural education (pp. 7-18). London: Falmer.
16.
Greene, T. G.
, & Heflin, J. F. (1992). State governments and multicultural education policy. Equity and Excellence, 25(2-4), 145-150.
17.
Hall, P. M.
(1995). The consequences of qualitative analysis for sociological theory: Beyond the micro level. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 397-423.
18.
Hall, P. M.
(1997). Meta-power, social organization and the shaping of social action. Symbolic Interaction, 20, 397-418.
19.
Hall, P. M.
, & McGinty, P. J. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Producing pro- gram from statute. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 439-467.
20.
Hoffman, D. M.
(1996). Culture and self in multicultural education: Reflections on discourse, text and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 545-569.
21.
Hoffman, D. M.
(1997). Diversity in practice: Perspectives on concept, context, and policy. Educational Policy, 11, 375-392.
22.
Howe, K. R.
(1992). Liberal democracy, equal educational opportunity, and the challenge of multiculturalism. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 445-470.
23.
Kohl, H.
(1991). The politically correct bypass: Multiculturalism and the public schools. Social Policy, 22(1), 33-40.
24.
LaRocque, L.
(1986). Policy implementation in a school district: A multiperspective approach. Canadian Journal of Education, 11, 486-508.
25.
Lee, D.
, & Saini, S. (1996). Antiracist multicultural education: From policy to planned implementation. Multicultural Teaching, 14(3), 21-25.
26.
Mattai, P. R.
(1992). Rethinking the nature of multicultural education: Has it lost its focus or is it being misused?Journal of Negro Education, 61(1), 65-77.
27.
McCarthy, C.
(1988). Rethinking liberal and radical perspectives on racial inequality in schooling: Making the case for nonsynchrony. Harvard Education Review, 58, 265-279.
28.
Persell, C.
, Dougherty, K., & Wenglinsky, H. (1993, October). Equity and diversity in American education (Unpublished Report of Round Table #1). OERI Conference on Equity and Excel- lence in Education: The Policy Uses of Sociology, Washington, DC.
29.
Placier, M.
, Hall, P. M., & Davis, B. (1997). Making multicultural education policy: The trans- formation of intentions. In P. Hall (Ed.), Race, ethnicity and multicultural education: Vol. 1. Missouri symposium on research in educational policy (pp. 169-201). New York: Garland.
30.
Scheurich, J. J.
, & Imber, M. (1991). Educational reforms can reproduce societal inequities: A case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 297-320.
31.
Sewell, W.
(1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.
32.
Sleeter, C.
, & Grant, C. (1994). Making choices for multicultural education (2nded.). New York: MacMillan.
33.
Stevenson, Z.
, & Gonzalez, L. (1992). Contemporary practices in multicultural approaches to education among the largest American school districts. Journal of Negro Education, 61, 356-369.
34.
Strauss, A.
, & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Troyna, B.
(1987). Beyond multiculturalism: Towards the enactment of anti-racist education in policy, provision and pedagogy. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 307-320.
36.
Troyna, B.
, & Hatcher, R. (1991). Racist incidents in schools: A framework for analysis. Journal of Educational Policy, 6(1), 17-31.
37.
Washburn, D. E.
(1994). Let's take a hard look at multicultural education. Multicultural Education, 2(2), 20-23.
38.
Watson, J.
(1988). From assimilation to anti-racism: Changing educational policies in England and Wales. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 531-552.
