Static computed tomography (CT) is an advanced 3D measurement technology. It offers key instrumentation advantages by reducing motion-induced artifacts, preserving measurement accuracy, and lowering radiation doses— critical factors for precision systems. This capability is particularly crucial for imaging moving organs such as the heart. This study introduces a novel Multi-Array Stationary CT (MASCT) imaging architecture. Utilizing cold- cathode carbon nanotube X-ray sources, the proposed architecture achieves dual innovations in temporal and spatial resolution, advancing stationary CT instrument design. Firstly, the X-ray source's rapid response allows for swift data acquisition. Coupled with its low power consumption and compact form factor, these characteristics collectively facilitate high temporal resolution, meeting the demands of dynamic imaging. Second, the densely arranged source array enhances angular resolution, while the z-axis MAS configuration extends scanning capacity for elongated objects, thereby expanding spatial resolution across multiple dimensions. To address practical implementation challenges, we incorporate iterative reconstruction algorithms to solve limited-angle problem, achieving diagnostically acceptable image quality. The feasibility of our multi-array X-ray source-based static CT system is rigorously validated through both numerical simulations and physical experiments.
WangJJZhuZJYangW, et al.The corrosion of AA2037 aluminum alloy in alkaline aqueous solution studied using slow positron beam spectroscopy. Nucl Sci Tech2016; 27: 30.
2.
RoebuckBAlmondEA. Deformation and fracture processes and the physical metallurgy ofWC-co hardmetals. Int Mater Rev1988; 33: 90–112.
3.
GernFHKochendörferR. Liquid silicon infiltration: description of infiltration dynamics and silicon carbide formation. Compos A, Appl Sci Manuf1997; 28: 355–364.
4.
EckhoffRK. Dust Explosions in the Process Industries: Identification, Assessment and Control of Dust Hazards. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2003.
5.
KalenderWA. CT: the unexpected evolution of an imaging modality. Eur Radiol Suppl2005; 15: d21–d24.
6.
RobbRAHoffmanEASinakLJ, et al.High- speed three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography: the dynamic spatial reconstructor. Proc IEEE1983; 71: 308–319.
7.
LiuYLiuHWangY, et al.Half-scan cone-beam CT fluoroscopy with multiple X-ray sources. Med Phys2001; 28: 1466–1471.
8.
GongHYanHJiaX, et al.X-ray scatter correction for multi-source interior computed tomography. Med Phys2017; 44: 71–83.
9.
WangGYuH. The meaning of interior tomography. Phys Med Biol2013; 58: R161–R186.
10.
YangYQFangWCHuangXX, et al.A new imaging mode based on X-ray CT as prior image and sparsely sampled projections for rapid clinical proton CT. Nucl Sci Tech2023; 34: 126.
11.
LiuYZhuTFLuoZ, et al.3D Robust anisotropic diffusion filtering algorithm for sparse view neutron computed tomography 3D image reconstruction. Nucl Sci Tech2024; 35: 50.
12.
WuWZhangJWangS, et al.Station- ary multi-source AI-powered real-time tomography (SMART) for dynamic cardiac imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12076. 2021.
YangGRajaramRCaoG, et al.Stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with a multi-beam field emission X-ray source array. In: Proc. SPIE, 2008, 6913, pp.69131A.
16.
QuanEMLalushDS. Three-dimensional imaging properties of rotation-free square and hexagonal micro- CT systems. IEEE Trans Med Imag2010; 29: 916–923.
17.
GonzalesBInscoeCLuJ, et al.Rectangular fixed- gantry CT prototype: combining CNT X-ray sources and accelerated compressed sensing-based reconstruction. IEEE Access2014; 2: 971–981.
18.
WuWZhangJWangS, et al.Flat-panel addressable cold-cathode X-ray source-based stationary CT architecture. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2023; 72: 1–9.
19.
QiMKHeTZhouYW, et al.Two Monte Carlo-based simulators for imaging-system modeling and projection simulation of flat-panel X-ray source. Nucl Sci Tech2024; 35: 114.
20.
ZhangXYDaiJCChenJ, et al.Characteristic analysis of anode panel for a ZnO nanowire cold cathode flat-panel X-ray source using monte carlo simulations. Nucl Sci Tech2025; 36: 186.
21.
HanJSLeeSHGoH, et al.High-performance cold cathode X-ray tubes using a carbon nanotube field electron emitter. ACS Nano2022; 16: 10231–10241.
22.
PuettCInscoeCHartmanA, et al.An update on carbon nanotube-enabled X-ray sources for biomedical imaging. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol2018; 10: e1475.
23.
CaoGLeeYZPengR, et al.A dynamic micro-CT scanner based on a carbon nanotube field emission x-ray source. Phys Med Biol2009; 54: 2323.
24.
ChengYZhangJLeeYZ, et al.Dynamic radiography using a carbon-nanotube-based field- emission x-ray source. Rev Sci Instrum2004; 75: 3264–3267.
25.
ZhangJYangGChengY, et al.Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters. Appl Phys Lett2005; 86: 184104.
26.
NeculaesVBCaiafaACaoY, et al.Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part II. X-ray source design and prototype. Med Phys2016; 43: 4617–4627.
27.
SchwoebelPRBooneJMShaoJ. Studies of a prototype linear stationary x-ray source for tomosynthesis imaging. Phys Med Biol2014; 59: 2393.
28.
ZhangDZhangSHeK, et al.High-performance X-ray source based on graphene oxide-coated Cu2S nanowires grown on copper film. Nanotechnology2020; 31: 485202.
29.
AvachatAVTuckerWWGiraldoCHC, et al.Looking inside a prototype compact X-ray tube comprising CNT-based cold cathode and transmission-type anode. Radiat Res2020; 193: 497–504.
30.
ShenYHanYZhanR, et al.Study on pyramidal molybdenum nanostructures cold cathode with large-current properties based on self-assembly growth method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 35354–35364.
31.
QianXTuckerAGidcumbE, et al.High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array. Med Phys2012; 39: 2090–2099.
32.
GunnellETFranceschiDKInscoeCR, et al.Initial clinical evaluation of stationary digital chest tomosynthesis in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Radiol2019; 29: 1665–1673.
33.
InscoeCRPlatinEMaurielloSM, et al.Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system. Med Phys2018; 45: 5172–5185.
34.
GonzalesBSpronkDChengY, et al.Rectangular fixed-gantry CT prototype: combining CNT X-ray sources and accelerated compressed sensing-based reconstruction. IEEE Access2014; 2: 971–981.
35.
PengRZhangJCalderon-ColonX, et al.Stationary micro-CT scanner using a distributed multi-beam field emission x-ray source: a feasibility study. In: Medical Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, 2009, 7258, pp.1318–1326.
36.
LuoYSpronkDLeeY, et al.Simulation and optimization of system configuration for the stationary head CT using CNT x-ray source array: reconstruction and quality evaluation. In: Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, 2020, 11312, pp.781–786.
37.
SpronkDLuoYInscoeC, et al.Feasibility of a stationary head CT scanner using a CNT x-ray source array. In: Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, 2020, 11312, pp.773–780.
38.
SpronkDLuoYInscoeCR, et al.Evaluation of carbon nanotube x-ray source array for stationary head computed tomography. Med Phys2021; 48: 1089–1099.
39.
YuHLiLTanC, et al.X-ray source translation based computed tomography (STCT). Opt Express2021; 29: 19743–19758.
40.
ChenJYuHNiS, et al.Weighted filtered back- projection for source translation computed tomography reconstruction. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2023; 72: 4506409.
41.
WuWYuHGongC, et al.Swinging multi-source industrial CT systems for aperiodic dynamic imaging. Opt Express2017; 25: 24215–24235.
42.
ZhuTFLiuYLuoZ, et al.Sparse-view neutron CT 3D image reconstruction algorithm based on split bregman method. Nucl Sci Tech2024; 35: 152.
43.
VázquezFGarzónEMFernándezJJ. Matrix implementation of simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT) on GPUs. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2011; 60: 1861–1868.
44.
ZhangSYWangZXYangHB, et al.Hformer: highly efficient vision transformer for low-dose CT denoising. Nucl Sci Tech2023; 34: 61.
45.
ZhangJZhouLWangL, et al.Diffusion kernel attention network for brain disorder classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2022; 41: 2814–2827.
