Cole, H.P., Process Education.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 1972, 114-115.
2.
Dittman, Jeanette, Individual Autonomy: The Magnificient Obsession, Educational Leadership, March 1976, 33, 463-467.
3.
Eisner, E.W., Applying the Five Orientations to 'Man: A course of Study,' in Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum. Edited by Elliot Eisner and Eisner and Elizabeth Vallance.Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1974, 193-199.
4.
Frymier, Jack, A School for Tomorrow. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1973, 3-84.
5.
Gentry, Don, Elkart Career Education Planning. Elkart, Indiana: Elkart Area Career Center, 1975.
6.
Guilford, J.P., The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
7.
Hoyt, K., and Hebeler, J., Career Education for Gifted and Talented Students Edited by Kenneth Hoyt and Jean Hebeler , Salt Lake, Utah: Olympus, 1974a, 7-11.
8.
Hoyt, K., and Hebeler, J., 1974b, 68-79.
9.
Hunt, D.E., Learning Styles and Teaching Strategies. Paper delivered at the meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, 1972.
10.
MacDonald, J.B. and Zaret, E., Commitment, in Schools in Search of Meaning, 1975 Yearbook. Edited James MacDonald and Ester Zaret.Washington, D. C.: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1975, 151-162.
11.
MacKinnon, D.W., Educating for Creativity: A Modern Myth? In Training for Creative Thinking. Edited by GaryDavis and Joseph Scott. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
12.
Marland, S.S., Career Education -- 300 Days Later, American Vocational Journal , 1972, 47, 14-17.
13.
Marland, S.J., S end Up More Sputniks. Paper delivered at the Nationwide Conference on the Education of the Gifted, Albany, New York, 1973.
14.
Michigan Department of Education.A Reference Guide: Goals and Performance, 1973.
15.
National Center for Educational Statistics, National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1972 .
16.
Petrie, H.G., Do You See What I See? The Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Inquiry, Educational Researcher, February, 1976, 5, 9-15.
17.
Piaget, Jean, To Understand Is To Invent. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1973, 91.
18.
Renzulli, J.S., Identifying Key Features in Programs for the Gifted, in Psychology and Education of the Gifted. Edited by Walter Barbe and Joseph Renzulli.New York: Irvington Publishers, 1975, 324-329.
19.
Salk, Jonas, The Survival of the Wisest. New York: Harper & Row, 1973, 16-18.
20.
Schmieder, A.A., Ten Critical Issues in Educational Reform, Journal of Teacher Education, Spring 1975, 26, 18-23.
21.
Toffler, Alvin, Testimony before the U. S. Senate Subcommittee onEnvironmental Pollution, December 15, 1975.
22.
Torrance, E.P., CreativePositives of Disadvantaged Children and Youth, Gifted Child Quarterly, 1969, 13, 71-81.
23.
U.S.O.E.Career Education: The State of the Scene. Washington: Office of Career Education, November, 1974, 29-122.
24.
Wallach, M.A. and Wing, C.W., The Talented Student: A Validation of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston , 1969.