Aspy, D.N., The Effect Of Teacher-Offered Conditions Of Empathy, Congruence, And Positive Regard Upon Student Achievement. Florida Journal OfEducational Research, 1969, 11, 39-48.
2.
Bailey, L.J. & Stadt, R.W., Career Education: New Approaches To Human Development. Bloomington, Illinois: McKnight, 1973.
3.
Bailey, L.J., Career Development For Children Project: Teacher's Set I, II and III., Bloomington, Illinois: McKnight, 1975. (a)
4.
Bailey, L.J., Curriculum For Career Development Education, Strategies For Curriculum Development ., Berkely, California: McCutchan , 1975, (in press). (b)
5.
Bruner, J.S., Toward A Theory of Instruction. New York: W. W. Norton, 1968.
6.
Bruner, J.S., On The Continuity Of Learning. Saturday Review, 1973, 1(2), 81-84.
7.
Bruner, J.S., The Process Of Education Revisited., Phi Delta Kappan,1971, 54(1), 18-21.
8.
Bruner, J.S., Oliver, R., & Greenfield, P. , StudiesIn Cognitive Development. New York: Wiley, 1966.
9.
Carkhuff, R. R. TrainingAs A Necessary Pre-Condition Of Education: The Development And Generalization Of A Systematic Human Resource Development Model. Journal of Research And Development In Education, 1971, 4, 13-16.
10.
Cole, H.P., Exemplary Curricula As Vehicles For Facilitating Creativity. Journal Of Research And Development In Education, 1971, 4, 23-28.
11.
Cole, H.P., Process Education., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 1972.
12.
Cole, H.P., Approaches To The Logical Validation Of Career Development Curricula Paradigms . Carbondale, Illinois: Career Development For Children Project, 1973.
13.
Cole, H.P. & Parsons, D.E., The Williams Total Creativity Program. Journal Of Creative Behavior. 1974, 8, 187-207.
14.
Coleman, J.S., How Do The Young Become Adults?Phi Delta Kappan,1972, 54(4), 226-230. (a)
15.
Coleman, J.S.The Children Have Outgrown The Schools. Psychology Today, 19725(9), 72-75+ 82. (b)
16.
Coleman, J. S. (ed.) Youth: Transition To Adulthood., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974.
17.
Combs, A. W. (ed.) Perceiving, Behaving, Becoming . Yearbook1962. Washington, D. C.: Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development , 1962.
18.
Derr, R. L. A Taxonomy Of Social Purposes OfPublic Schools., New York: McKay, 1973.
19.
Fantini, M.D. & Weinstein, G., The Disadvantaged: Challenge To Education. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
20.
Gagne, R.M., Psychological IssuesIn Science: A Process Approach., Psychological Bases Of Science: A Process Approach . Washington, D. C.: American Association For The Advancement Of Science, 1965, 1-8.
21.
Gagne, R.M., The Conditions Of Learning. New York: Holt, 1970.
22.
Gordon, E.W., Broadening The Concept Of Career Education., IRCD Bulletin , 1973, 9(2), 1-7.
23.
Guilford, J.P., The Nature Of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
24.
Illich, I., Tools For Conviviality., New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
25.
Livermore, A.H., The Process Approach Of The AAAS Commission On Science Education. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 1964, 2, 271-282.
26.
Piaget, J., To Understand Is To Invent., New York: Viking, 1973.
27.
Rubin, L. J., (Editor) Life Skills In School And Society. Washington, D. C.: Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development, 1969.
28.
Rubin, L. J. (ed.) Facts And Feelings In The Classroom. New York: Viking, 1973.
29.
Maslow, A.H., A Theory Of Human Motivation., Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
30.
Maslow, A.H., Toward A.Psychology Of Being. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand, 1962.
31.
Pucinski, R.C. Prologue: A Prospectus For the Seventies. In Pucinski, R. C. & Hirsch, S. P., The Courage To Change: New Directions For Career Education. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971, pp. 3-19.
32.
Seferian, A. & Cole, H.P., EncountersIn Thinking: A Compendium Of Curricula For Process Education. Buffalo, New York: Creative Education Foundation, Occasional Paper Number 6, 1970.
33.
Staats, Q.W., Child Learning, Intelligence And Personality, New York : Harper & Row, 1971.
34.
Walbasser, H.H., Science - A Process Approach: An Evaluation Model And Its Application. Second Report. Washington, D. C.: American Association For The Advancement Of Science, 1968.