This study applied Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to examine factors influencing the academic aspirations of high-achieving sixth and seventh graders (n = 178) in a Talent Identification and Career Exploration (TICE) program, emphasizing geographical and gender differences. Participants were from rural, micropolitan, and college towns in the Midwest. Hierarchical linear regression explored the role of math and science aptitude, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, interests, and community influence on academic aspirations. Math self-efficacy was significantly associated with four-year college aspirations, while science outcome expectations and community influence were associated with advanced degree aspirations. Notable gender and geographic differences emerged; girls reported higher aspirations for advanced degrees despite lower aptitude in math and science than boys, whereas students from college towns reported higher advanced degree aspirations than those from micropolitan and rural areas. Implications for research, intervention, and policy are discussed, including promoting math and science as a pathway for rural revitalization.
AbelJ. R.DeitzR. (2012). Do colleges and universities increase their region’s human capital?Journal of Economic Geography, 12(3), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr020
2.
AliS. R.Loh GarrisonY.CervantesZ. M.DawsonD. A. (2021). Sociopolitical development and healthcare career interest, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among rural youth. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(5), 701–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000211007440
3.
AliS. R.MartensJ. K.ButtonC.LarmaN. C. (2011). Initial scale development of the contextual support for post-secondary planning scales. Journal of Career Development, 38(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310372375
4.
AliS. R.McWhirterE. H. (2006a). Rural Appalachian youth’s vocational/educational applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845306293347
AliS. R.McWhirterE. H.ChronisterK. M. (2005). Self-efficacy and vocational outcome expectations for adolescents of lower socioeconomic status: A pilot study. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270273
7.
AliS. R.MenkeK. A. (2014). Rural latino youth career development: An application of social cognitive career theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00078
8.
AliS. R.PhamA.Loh GarrisonY.BrownS. D. (2019). Project HOPE: Sociopolitical development and SCCT beliefs of latinx and white rural middle school students. Journal of Career Development, 46(4), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319832973
9.
AliverniniF.LucidiF. (2011). Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003728062
10.
AssoulineS. G.IhrigL. M.MahatmyaD. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701833
11.
AssoulineS. G.Lupkowski-ShoplikA. (2012). The talent search model of gifted identification. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911433946
12.
AssoulineS. G.MahatmyaD.IhrigL.LaneE. (2021). High-achieving rural middle-school students’ academic self-efficacy and attributions in relationship to gender. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1740582
13.
AssoulineS. G.MahatmyaD.IhrigL. M.LynchS.KarakisN. (2023). A theoretically based STEM talent development program that bridges excellence gaps. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1522(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14978
14.
BaldwinD. A.MoffettK. W. (2015). Understanding the college town: An exploration of the relationship between town and gown. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(3), 7–36.
15.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
16.
BarronC. (2016). The Silent Epidemic: Young men dropping out of college. Psychology Today.
17.
Battin-PearsonS.NewcombM. D.AbbottR. D.HillK. G.CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.568
18.
BernsenN. R.CrandallM. S.LeahyJ. E.BiddleC. (2022). How far to go? Community influences on youth educational aspirations in rural, resource-dependent places. RSF. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 8(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.3.08
19.
BetzN. E.VoytenK. K. (1997). Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness. The Career Development Quarterly, 46(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb01004.x
20.
BiddleC.AzanoA. P. (2016). Constructing and reconstructing the “rural school problem”: A century of rural education research. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 298–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16667700
21.
BowmanN. A.HillP. L. (2011). Measuring how college affects students: Social desirability and other potential biases in college student self‐reported gains. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(150), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.390
22.
BritnerS. L.PajaresF. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
23.
ByunS.MeeceJ. L.AggerC. A. (2017). Predictors of college attendance patterns of rural youth. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 817–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9449-z
24.
CabellA. L. (2021). Career search self-efficacy and STEM major persistence. The Career Development Quarterly, 69(2), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12256
25.
CarrP. J.KefalasM. J. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Beacon Press.
26.
Carsey Institute. (2009). The potential for rural-based telemedicine in improving access to health care. University of New Hampshire.
27.
ChenJ. A.PajaresF. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
CordesS. M.FanninJ. M. (2015). Micropolitan America: A new and critical part of the nation’s geography.
30.
CrabtreeS.GarrettL.ScottC. (2019). Addressing the STEM gap in rural America: The role of broadband and technology. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(2), 25–43.
31.
CrockettL. J.ShanahanM. J.Jackson-NewsomJ. (2000). Rural youths: Ecological and life course perspectives. In MontemayorR.AdamsG.GullottaT. (Eds.), Adolescent diversity in ethnic,economic, and cultural contexts (pp. 43–74). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225647.n3
32.
CromartieJ.StackC. B. (2014). Rural America at a glance: 2014 edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
33.
DiPreteT. A.BuchmannC. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
FanX.ChenM. J. (1999). Academic achievement in rural school students: A multiyear comparison with their peers in suburban and urban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(1), 31–46.
35.
FeehanP. F.JohnstonJ. A. (1999). The Self-Directed Search and career self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279900700204
36.
FosterS.GilletteC. (2023). Can micropolitan areas bridge the urban-rural divide?Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 24(2), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2023-0017
37.
FouadN. A.SantanaM. C. (2017). SCCT and the career development of individuals in STEM fields: A focus on women and underrepresented groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 43–61.
38.
FouadN. A.SmithP. L. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.43.3.338
39.
FouadN. A.SmithP. L.EnochsL. (1997). Reliability and validity evidence for the middle school self efficacy scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1997.12068914
40.
GibbonsM. M.TaylorA. L.BrownE.DanielsS. K.HardinE. E.ManringS. (2020). Assessing postsecondary barriers for rural Appalachian high school students. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719845329
41.
GreenS. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
42.
GumprechtB. (2008). The American college town. University of Massachusetts Press.
43.
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
44.
HetheringtonJ. (2000). Role of theory and experimental design in multivariate analysis and mathematical modeling. In TinsleyH. E. A.BrownS. D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 37–63): Academic Press.
45.
HuangX.ZhangJ.HudsonL. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: The gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
46.
JacobB. A.WilderT. (2010). Educational aspirations and attainment among U.S. high school seniors: Gender and racial differences. Gender and Education, 22(6), 605–625.
47.
JeyaramanM.RamasubramanianS.BalajiS.JeyaramanN.NallakumarasamyA.SharmaS. (2023). ChatGPT in action: Harnessing artificial intelligence potential and addressing ethical challenges in medicine, education, and scientific research. World Journal of Methodology, 13(4), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.170
48.
LauS.RoeserR. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_04
49.
LavalleyM. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. National School Boards Association, Center for Public Education.
50.
LentR. W.BrownS. D. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, Article 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004
51.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
52.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36
53.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1991). Mathematics self efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
54.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1993). Predicting mathematics-related choice and success behaviors: Test of an expanded social cognitive model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1016
55.
LentR. W.SheuH.MillerM. J.CusickM. E.PennL. T.TruongN. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
LuzzoD. A.HasperP.AlbertK. A.BibbyM. A.MartinelliE. A.Jr. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/ science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.46.2.233
58.
MahatmyaD.SmithA. (2017). Family and neighborhood influences on meeting college expectations in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5(3), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815626821
59.
MalteseA. V.TaiR. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385
60.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Digest of education statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/
National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators (BPS 12/14; 2011–12 beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study). National Center for Education Statistics.
63.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017c). Doctoral degrees awarded to women, by field: 2004–14. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 (special report NSF 17-310). Author. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/data/tab7-2.pdf
64.
NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y.WorthingtonR. L. (2007). Mexican American middle school students’ goal intentions in mathematics and science: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.320
65.
PatrickL.CareE.AinleyM. (2011). The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710382615
66.
PernaL. W.TitusM. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0036
67.
PetrinR. A.SchafftK. A.MeeceJ. L. (2014). Educational sorting and residential aspirations among rural high school students: What are the contributing factors?American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 294–326. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214527493
68.
PigottT. D. (2001). A review of methods for missing data. In SchinkaJ. J.VelicerW. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (2, pp. 643–673). John Wiley & Sons.
69.
PluckerJ. A.HardestyJ.BurroughsN. (2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs, CY: Center for education policy analysis. University of Connecticut. https://cepa.uconn.edu/home/research/mindthegap/
ReevesR. V. (2022). Of boys and men: Why the modern male is struggling, why it matters, and what to do about it. Brookings Institution Press.
72.
RottinghausP. J.LarsonL. M.BorgenF. H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00039-8
SmithP. L.FouadN. A. (1999). Subject-matter specificity of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, interests, and goals: Implications for the social–cognitive model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.4.461
75.
SpelkeE. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958.
76.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10382877
77.
TrustyJ.RobinsonC. R.PlataM.NgK. (2000). Effects of gender, socioeconomic status, and early academic performance on postsecondary educational choice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01930.x
TurnerS. L.JoengJ. R.SimsM. D.DadeS. N.ReidM. F. (2019). SES, gender, and STEM career interests, goals, and actions: A test of SCCT. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748665
U.S. Department of Labor. (2015). Occupational outlook handbook: U.S. Government Printing Office.
84.
VenterA.MaxwellS. E. (2000). Issues in the use and application of multiple regression analysis. In TinsleyH. E. A.BrownS. D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 151–182). Academic Press.
85.
WangD.GuoD.SongC.HaoL.QiaoZ. (2022). General self-efficacy and employability among financially underprivileged Chinese college students: The mediating role of achievement motivation and career aspirations. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 719771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719771
86.
WangM.-T.DegolJ. L. (2017). Gender gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
87.
WellsR. S.ChenL.BettencourtG. M.HaasS. (2023). Reconsidering rural-nonrural college enrollment gaps: The role of socioeconomic status in geographies of opportunity. Research in Higher Education, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09737-8
88.
WilliamsJ. E.LuoM. (2010). Understanding first-year persistence at a micropolitan university: Do geographic characteristics of students' home city matter?College Student Journal, 44(2), 362.
