In this study, we investigate the role of matching communication (i.e., relational messages received) in mentoring outcomes (mentor and protégé career attitudes). Specifically, we used data from a sample of 145 matched mentor–protégé dyads in a response surface analysis to show that matched relational messaging generally relates to mentors (and less consistently, protégés) reporting enhanced career satisfaction and career commitment. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with previous research showing that when relational messages (i.e., intimacy) or self-disclosure are matched at high or low (i.e., more extreme) levels, the mentor and protégé have the best outcomes. Additionally, beneficial mentor outcomes were maximized when levels of seriousness were matched at a moderate level. These results suggest that both levels of relational messaging, as well as the degree to which mentors and protégé match on these constructs influences mentoring outcomes. Study limitations, future directions for research, and implications for career development are discussed.
AllenT. D.DayR.LentzE. (2005). The role of interpersonal comfort in mentoring relationships. Journal of Career Development, 31(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10871-004-2224-3
2.
AllenT. D.EbyL. T.O'BrienK. E.LentzE. (2008). The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.004
3.
AllenT. D.LentzE.DayR. (2006). Career success outcomes associated with mentoring others: A comparison of mentors and nonmentors. Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305282942
4.
AllenT. D.PoteetM. L. (1999). Developing effective mentoring relationships: Strategies from the mentor’s viewpoint. The Career Development Quarterly, 48(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00275.x
5.
AllenT. D.PoteetM. L.BurroughsS. M. (1997). The mentor's perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1596
6.
ArmstrongS. J.AllinsonC. W.HayesJ. (2002). Formal mentoring systems: An examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1111–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00326
7.
Blake-BeardS. D. (2001). Taking a hard look at formal mentoring programs: A consideration of potential challenges facing women. The Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710110388983
8.
BlickleG.SchneiderP. B.PerrewéP. L.BlassF. R.FerrisG. R. (2008). The roles of self‐disclosure, modesty, and self‐monitoring in the mentoring relationship: A longitudinal multi‐source investigation. Career Development International, 13(3), 224–240.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390195
10.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390214
11.
BurgoonJ. K.WangX.ChenX.PentlandS. J.DunbarN. E. (2021). Nonverbal behaviors “speak” relational messages of dominance, trust, and composure. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 624177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624177
12.
BurkH. G.EbyL. T. (2010). What keeps people in mentoring relationships when bad things happen? A field study from the protégé’s perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.011
13.
BurlesonB.MacGeorgeE.KnappM.DalyJ. (2022). Supportive communication. In Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Sage.
14.
CarsonK. D.BedeianA. G. (1994). Career commitment: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1017
15.
CzerskaI. (2022). Health literacy and its role in relational communication with patients: The study of literature and concepts. European Research Studies Journal, 25(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2831
16.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
17.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
18.
EnsherE. A.MurphyS. E. (2005). Power mentoring: How successful mentors and protégés get the most out of their relationships. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
19.
EsnardT.Cobb-RobertsD.AgostoV.KaranxhaZ.BeckM.WuK.UnterreinerA. (2015). Productive tensions in a cross-cultural peer mentoring women’s network: A social capital perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1011035
20.
Fagenson‐ElandE. A.Gayle BaughS.LankauM. J. (2005). Seeing eye to eye: A dyadic investigation of the effect of relational demography on perceptions of mentoring activities. Career Development International, 10(6/7), 460–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510620557
21.
FletcherJ. K.RaginsB. R. (2008). Stone center relational cultural theory. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 373–399). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619
HarperJ. M.ElliottM. L. (1988). Can there be too much of a good thing? The relationship between desired level of intimacy and marital adjustment. American Journal of Family Therapy, 16(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926188808250740
24.
HarrisonJ.DymokeS.PellT. (2006). Mentoring beginning teachers in secondary schools: An analysis of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.021
25.
Headlam-WellsJ.GoslandJ.CraigJ. (2006). Beyond the organisation: The design and management of E-mentoring systems. International Journal of Information Management, 26(5), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.04.001
26.
HuC.BaranikL. E.WuT. Y. (2014). Antidotes to dissimilar mentor–protégé dyads. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.07.002
27.
HuC.WangS.WangY. H.ChenC.JiangD. Y. (2016). Understanding attraction in formal mentoring relationships from an affective perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.007
28.
HubbardA. S. E.BurgoonJ. K. (2019). Nonverbal communication. In An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (pp. 333–346). Routledge.
JanssenS.van VuurenM.de JongM. D. T. (2016). Informal mentoring at work: A review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 498–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12069
31.
KramK. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
32.
LandersR. N.BehrendT. S. (2015). An inconvenient truth: Arbitrary distinctions between organizational, Mechanical Turk, and other convenience samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.13
33.
LiX. S.WikleJ. S.SchraedelJ.YorgasonJ.JamesS. (2023). Relational communication as a moderator for links between family of origin adversity and marital satisfaction. Family Relations, 72(4), 1955–1973. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12808
34.
MikkelsonA. C.HesseC. (2009). Discussions of religion and relational messages: Differences between comfortable and uncomfortable interactions. Southern Communication Journal, 74(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940802449382
35.
MikkelsonA. C.SloanD.HesseC. (2019). Relational communication messages and leadership styles in supervisor/employee relationships. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(4), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687267
36.
MitchellM. E.EbyL. T.RaginsB. R. (2015). My mentor, myself: Antecedents and outcomes of perceived similarity in mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.008
37.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512452989
38.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
39.
NassC.LeeK. M. (2001). Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.171
40.
PoteatL. F.ShockleyK. M.AllenT. D. (2009). Mentor-protégé commitment fit and relationship satisfaction in academic mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.02.003
41.
PurcellG.ScheyvensR. (2015). International business mentoring for development: The importance of local context and culture. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12057
42.
RaginsB. R.VerbosA. K. (2017). Positive relationships in action: Relational mentoring and mentoring schemas in the workplace. In Exploring positive relationships at work (pp. 91–116). Psychology Press.
43.
RoulinN. (2015). Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater: Comparing data quality of crowdsourcing, online panels, and student samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.24
44.
SeibertS. E.KraimerM. L.HoltomB. C.PierottiA. J. (2013). Even the best laid plans sometimes go askew: Career self-management processes, career shocks, and the decision to pursue graduate education. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030882
45.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattisonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
46.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattisonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2014). Erratum to: Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9317-6
47.
SinghR.RaginsB. R.TharenouP. (2009). Who gets a mentor? A longitudinal assessment of the rising star hypothesis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.009
48.
SwapW.LeonardD.ShieldsM.AbramsL. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045668
49.
WanbergC. R.WelshE. T.HezlettS. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. In MartocchioJ. J.FerrisG. R. (Eds.), Research in Personnel and human resources management (Vol. 22, pp. 39–124). Elsevier Science Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22002-8
50.
WanbergC. R.WelshE. T.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. (2007). Protégé and mentor self-disclosure: Levels and outcomes within formal mentoring dyads in a corporate context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.01.002
51.
WeinbergF. J.LankauM. J. (2011). Formal mentoring programs: A mentor-centric and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1527–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349310
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
