Future time perspective, like self-efficacy, can be understood both generally and domain specifically. Keeping this in mind, the current study aimed at developing and validating a Career Future Time Perspective Scale. In Study 1, we utilized an exploratory factor analysis and the Rasch rating model to ensure the construct validity of a Career Future Time Perspective Scale. The scale consisted of three factors—opportunity, value, and connectedness—across 9 items. In Study 2, we showed that this three-factor oblique scale was the most representative structure of career future time perspective. Study 3 demonstrated that after controlling for the future time perspective measures posited by Shell and Husman and Carstensen and Lang, this scale could also be used to explain: (a) career decision-making self-efficacy, (b) career-indecision tendencies, and (c) career-searching behavior. In Study 4, the reliability of the scale was demonstrated.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.
2.
AtkinsonJ. W.RaynorJ. O. (1978). Personality, motivation, and achievement. Hemisphere.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238.
5.
BetzN. E.VoytenK. K. (1997). Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness. The Career Development Quarterly, 46, 179–189.
6.
BlauG. (1993). Further exploring the relationship between job search and voluntary individual turnover. Personnel Psychology, 46, 213–330.
7.
BlauG. (1994). Testing a two-dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 288–312.
8.
BondT.FoxC. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
9.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 8. Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.
10.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
11.
CarstensenL. L.LangF. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
12.
CateR. A.JohnO. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186.
13.
CohenA. (1983). Comparing regression coefficients across subsamples: A study of the statistical test. Sociological Methods & Research, 12, 77–94.
14.
DevolderM.LensW. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566–571.
15.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272.
16.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286.
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
18.
HusmanJ.JonathanC.BremK. (2016). Future time perspective connectedness to a career: The contextual effects of classroom knowledge building. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 210–225.
19.
HusmanJ.LensW. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125.
20.
HusmanJ.ShellD. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166–175.
21.
Ji-youngL.Jae-yoonJ.Myung-unK. (2004). The relationship of career indecision, job search behavior and employment among college seniors. Korean Psychological Association, 11, 1–23.
22.
JöreskogK. G. (1983). Factor analysis as an error-in-variables model. In WainerH.MessickS. (Eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement (pp. 185–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
24.
JungH.ParkI. J.RieJ. (2015). Future time perspective and career decisions: The moderating effects of affect spin. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 46–55.
25.
KimM. (2008). Exploring the concept of wisdom and its role on the life among middle-aged and elder adults in Korea (Doctoral Dissertation). Seoul, South Korea: Seoul National University.
26.
KoH. J. (1992). The analysis of career decisions and the effects of career counseling among college students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sukmyung Woman’s University.
27.
KooijD. T.KanferR.BettsM.RudolphC. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 867.
28.
KorffJ.BiemannT.VoelpelS. C. (2017). Human resource management systems and work attitudes: The mediating role of future time perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 45–67.
29.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and aging, 17, 125–139.
30.
LeeE. (2001). A study on the effect of self-A study on the effect of self-efficacy upon the career development (Doctoral dissertation). Ewha University.
31.
LensW.TsuzukiM. (2005). The role of motivation and future time perspective in educational and career development. Paper presented at the International Conference of the International Association for Educational and Vocational Guidance (IAEVG). Lisbon, Portugal.
32.
LinacreJ. M. (1999). Understanding rasch measurement: estimation methods for Rasch measures. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 382–405.
33.
MahajnaS. (2017). Emerging adulthood among Palestinian minority in Israel: The relation between perceived career barriers, future orientation and career decisions. Educational Studies, 43, 296–311.
34.
MarkoK. W.SavickasM. L. (1998). Effectiveness of a career time perspective intervention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 106–119.
35.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. (2007). Self‐determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 850–865.
ParkI. J. (2014). The influence of career future time perspective on career decisions and career behaviors (Doctoral dissertation). Chuncheon, South Korea: Hallym University.
38.
ParkI. J.JungH. (2015). Relationships among future time perspective, career and organizational commitment, occupational self-efficacy, and turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43, 1547–1561.
39.
ParkI. J.RieJ.KimH. S.ParkJ. (2018). Effects of a future time perspective–based career intervention on career decisions. Journal of Career Development. doi:10.1177/0894845318781043
40.
QuintanaS. M.MaxwellS. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485–527.
41.
SavickasM. L. (1991). The meaning of work and love: Career issues and interventions. The Career Development Quarterly, 39, 315–324.
42.
ShellD. F.HusmanJ. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481–506.
43.
WalkerT. L.TraceyT. J. (2012). The role of future time perspective in career decision-making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 150–158.
44.
WallaceM. (1956) Future time perspective in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 240–245.
ZacherH.FreseM. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487.
47.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal Perspective Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
48.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (2015). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. In MaciejS.FieulaineN.van BeekW. (Eds.), Time perspective theory: Review, research and application (pp. 17–55). Berlin, Germany: Springer International.
