Young women with disabilities often experience limited career options and opportunities. This study provides an overview and preliminary results from the “Paths 2 the Future” (P2F) curriculum designed to meet the unique career development needs of young women with disabilities. P2F includes 75 lessons covering topics of self-awareness, disability knowledge, gender identity, and career and college readiness. Survey data were collected from young women with learning, health, intellectual, and emotional disabilities who participated in the curriculum in four high schools (N = 49). Paired sample t tests documented significant improvements from pretest to posttest scores for disability and gender awareness, vocational skills self-efficacy, self-realization, and an overall career development construct. Focus groups were conducted to gather feedback on participant experiences. Young women in the focus groups noted the unique benefits of a “girls only” class and described increases in self-awareness and personal empowerment.
AnfaraV. A.JrBrownK. M.MangioneT. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational researcher, 31, 28–38. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007028
2.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.KimD.ReschlyA. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
3.
BetzN. E. (2005). Women’s career development. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 253–277). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
4.
DorenB.BenzM. (1998). Employment inequality revisited. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 425–442. doi:10.1177/002246699803100402
5.
DorenB.GauJ.LindstromL. (2011). The role of gender in the long-term employment outcomes of young adults with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 35–42. doi:10.3233/JVR-2010-0532
6.
DorenB.LombardiA. R.ClarkJ.LindstromL. (2013). Addressing career barriers for high-risk adolescent girls: The PATHS curriculum. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1083–1092. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08014
7.
FerriB.ConnorD. (2010). ‘I was the special ed. girl’: Urban working-class young women of colour. Gender & Education, 22, 105–121. doi:10.1080/09540250802612688
8.
HogansenJ.PowersK.GeenenS.Gil-KashiwabaraE.PowersL. (2008). Transition goals and experiences of females with disabilities: Youth, parents, and professionals. Exceptional Children, 74, 215–234. doi:10.1177/001440290807400205
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C. $ 1400 et seq.
10.
KenaG.HussarW.McFarlandJ.de BreyC.Musu-GilletteL.WangX.,…Dunlop VelezE. (2016). The condition of education 2016. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
11.
LindstromL. E.BenzM. R. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 67–83.
12.
LindstromL.BenzM.DorenB. (2004). Expanding career options for young women with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 43–63.
13.
LindstromL.HarwickR.PoppenM.DorenB. (2012). Gender gaps: Career development for young women with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 108–117.
14.
LindstromL.PostC. (2015). Paths 2 the Future Curriculum for High School Girls with Disabilities. Secondary Special Education and Transition Research Unit. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon.
15.
LombardiA. R.GerdesH.MurrayC. (2011). Validating an assessment of individual actions, postsecondary supports, and social supports of college students with disabilities. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48, 107–126. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6214
16.
MazzottiV.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM. (2015). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analysis. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 196–215. doi:10.1177/2165143415588047
17.
McWhirterE. H.RasheedS.CrothersM.HansenJ.- I. C. (2000). The effects of high school career education on social–cognitive variables. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 330–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.3.330
18.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M. (2009). The Post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009–3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
20.
NovakovicA.FouadN. (2012). Background, personal and environmental influences on career planning of adolescent girls. Journal of Career Development, 40, 223–244. doi:10.1177/0894845312449380
21.
NovotonyA. (2011). Coed versus single-sex ed: Does separating boys and girls improve their education? Experts on both sides of the issue weigh in. American Psychological Association Monitor on Psychology, 42, 58. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/02/coed.aspx
22.
PowersK.HogansenJ.GeenenS.PowersL.Gil-KashiwabaraE. (2008). Gender matters in the transition to adulthood: A survey study of adolescents with disabilities and their families. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 349–364. doi:10.1002/pits.20297
23.
RogersM. E.CreedP. A. (2011). A longitudinal examination of adolescent career planning and exploration using a social cognitive career theory framework. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 163–172.
24.
RojewskiJ.LeeI.GreggN.GemiciS. (2012). Development patterns of occupational aspirations in adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 157–179.
25.
RoussoH. (2003). Educational for all: Gender and disability perspective. Background paper prepared for the education for all global monitoring report 2003/4. Paris, France: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
26.
SmithR. D. (2005). The meaning of workplace discrimination for women with disabilities. Work (Reading, Mass.), 24, 369–380.
27.
TrainorA. (2007). Perceptions of adolescent girls with LD regarding self-determination and postsecondary transition planning. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10567-012-0121-z
28.
U.S. Department of Education, Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C. $ 1400 et seq. Retrieved fromhttps://sites.ed.gov/idea/statuteregulations/
29.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s self-determination scale. Arlington, TX: Arc National Headquarters.
