There is an increasing concern that the demand for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workers in the United States will exceed the supply. In the United States, very few students, and underrepresented students in particular, are pursuing STEM educational and occupational goals that underscores the need for school counselors to understand how to maximize opportunities for student success in STEM. Understanding the factors that influence students’ academic and career choices early on is necessary in order to provide effective interventions and responsive services that will have a positive impact on students’ future STEM career outcomes. Using social-cognitive career theory as a framework, this article synthesizes pertinent research on student STEM engagement, so that school counselors will be better able to support STEM career development for all students, especially those from historically underrepresented groups. Implications for school counseling practice are discussed.
American Association of University Women. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs. Alexandra, VA: Author.
3.
AronsonJ.FriedC. B.GoodC. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
7.
BetzN. E. (2007). Career self-efficacy: Exemplary recent research and emerging directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 403–422. doi:10.1177/1069072707305759
8.
BetzN. E.HackettG. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329–345.
9.
BetzN. E.SchifanoR. S. (2000). Evaluation of an intervention to increase realistic self-efficacy and interests in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 35–52.
10.
BiglerR. S.AverhartC. J.LibenL. S. (2003). Race and the workforce: Occupational status, aspirations, and stereotyping among African American children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 572.
11.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
12.
BrownC. S.AlabiB. O.HuynhV. W.MastenC. L. (2011). Ethnicity and gender in late childhood and early adolescence: Group identity and awareness of bias. Developmental Psychology, 47, 463. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021819
13.
BurkamD. T.LeeV. E. (2003). Mathematics, foreign language, and science coursetaking and the NELS: 88 transcript data (NCES 2003-01). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
14.
BurkeP. J.HoelterJ. W. (1988). Identity and sex-race differences in educational and occupational aspirations formation. Social Science Research, 17, 29–47.
15.
Byars-Winston, A. (2014). Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions. The Career Development Quarterly, 62, 340–357.
16.
BystydzienskiJ. M.EisenhartM.BruningM. (2015). High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. The Career Development Quarterly, 63, 88–95. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2015.00097.x
17.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.
18.
ChemersM. M.ZurbriggenE. L.SyedM.GozaB. K.BearmanS. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 469–491.
DavenportE. C.JrDavisonM. L.KuangH.DingS.KimS.KwakN. (1998). High school mathematic course-taking by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 497–514.
21.
DawesM. E.HoranJ. J.HackettG. (2000). Experimental evaluation of self-efficacy treatment on technical/scientific career outcomes. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 28, 87–99.
22.
DweckC. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65, 34–39.
23.
EcclesJ. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M. (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11546-016
24.
EcclesJ. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368
25.
EcclesJ. S.JacobsJ. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11, 367–380.
26.
EcclesJ. S.JacobsJ. E.HaroldR. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201.
27.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
28.
FalcoL. D.SummersJ. S.BaumanS. (2010). Encouraging mathematics participation through improved self-efficacy: A school counseling outcomes study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 529–549.
29.
FennemaE.PetersonP. L.CarpenterT. P.LubinskiC. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 55–69.
30.
FergusonR. F. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38, 460–507.
31.
FerryT. R.FouadN. A.SmithP. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 348–364.
32.
FisherC. B.WallaceS. A.FentonR. E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 679–695. doi:10.1023/A:1026455906512
33.
FouadN. A.GuillenA. (2006). Outcome expectations: Looking to the past and potential future. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 130–142. doi:10.1177/1069072705281370
34.
FranklinD. (2013). A practical guide to gender diversity for computer science faculty. Synthesis Lectures on Professionalism and Career Advancement for Scientists and Engineers, 1, 1–81.
35.
GarriottP. O.FloresL. Y.PrabhakarB.MazzottaE. C.LiskovA. C.ShapiroJ. E. (2013). Parental support and underrepresented students’ math/science interests: The mediating role of learning experiences. Journal of Career Assessment. doi:1069072713514933
36.
GrossmanJ. M.PorcheM. V. (2013). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49, 698–727. doi:10.1177/0042085913481364
37.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Feminist Forum, 66, 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-996-2
38.
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326–339.
39.
HalpernD. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40.
HansonS. L. (2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal, 16, 96–115.
41.
HartmanH.HartmanM. (2008). How undergraduate engineering students perceive women’s (and men’s) problems in science, math and engineering. Sex Roles, 58, 251–265.
42.
HerbertJ.StipekD. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children’s perceptions of their academic competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 276–295.
43.
HernandezP. R.SchultzP.EstradaM.WoodcockA.ChanceR. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 89–107.
44.
Holcomb-McCoyC. (2007). School counseling to close the achievement gap: A social-justice framework for success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
45.
HornL.KojakuL. K. (2001). High school academic curriculum and the persistence path through college: Persistence and transfer behavior of undergraduates 3 years after entering 4-year institutions (NCES 2001-163) (ERIC Document Reproduction N. ED 456 694).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
46.
HurtadoS.CabreraN. L.LinM. H.ArellanoL.EspinosaL. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189–214.
47.
HydeJ. S.LindbersS. M.LinnM. C.EllisA. B.WilliamsC. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. doi:10.111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
48.
JacobsJ. E. (1991). Influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 518.
49.
JacobsJ. E.LanzaS.OsgoodD. W.EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades on through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421
50.
JurikV.GröschnerA.SeidelT. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls’ and boys’ verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and instruction, 23, 33–42. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002
51.
KahleJ. B.MeeceJ. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In GabelD. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York, NY: Macmillan.
52.
KellerC. (2001). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 165–173. doi:10.1080/00224540109600544
53.
LangdonD.McKittrickG.BeedeD.KhanB.DomsM. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future (ESA Issue Brief# 03-11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
54.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
55.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36
56.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of CounselingPsychology, 38, 424–430.
57.
LongM. C.CongerD.IatarolaP. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 285–322. doi:10.3102/0002831211431952
58.
LopezF. G.LentR. W. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 41, 3–12.
59.
LuzzoD. A.McWhirterE. H. (2001). Sex and ethnic differences in the perception of educational and career-related barriers and levels of coping efficacy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 61–67.
60.
MarshH. W.CravenR.DebusR. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children’s self-concepts: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030–1053.
61.
MarxD. M.StapelD. A.MullerD. (2005). We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 432. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432
62.
MehalikM. M.DoppeltY.SchuunC. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85.
63.
MidgleyC.FeldlauferH.EcclesJ. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981–992.
64.
MilamJ. (2012). Girls and STEM education: A literature review. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
65.
MuellerC. M.DweckC. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33.
66.
MurphyM. C.SteelC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.
67.
MuseusS. D.PalmerR. T.DavisR. J.MarambaD. C. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority student success in STEM education: ASHE higher education report. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
68.
National Academy of Science. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing america for a brighter economic future committee on prospering in the global economy of the 21st century. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog11463.html
69.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). STEM in postsecondary education: Entrance, Attrition, and Coursetaking among 2003-04 beginning postsecondary students. Retrieved fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013152.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 (Special Report NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/2015/nsff15311/tables.cfm
72.
O’BrienK. M.BikosL. H.EpsteinK. L.FloresL. Y.DuksteinR. D.KamatukaN. A. (2000). Enhancing the career decision-making self-efficacy of upward bound students. Journal of Career Development, 26, 277–293.
73.
PackardB. W. L.NguyenD. (2003). Science career-related possible selves of adolescent girls: A longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development, 29, 251–263.
74.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
75.
PajaresF. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In GallagherA. M.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
76.
ParsonsJ. E.AdlerT. F.KaczalaC. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53, 310–321.
77.
PhinneyJ. S. (2000). Identity formation across cultures: The interaction of personal, societal, and historical change. Human Development, 43, 27–31.
78.
PintrichP. R.De GrootE. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33.
79.
ReyesL. H.StanicG. M. A. (1998). Race, sex, socioeconomic status, and mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 26–43.
80.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39, 656–664. doi:10.3102/0013189X10391657
81.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB.GrodskyE.MullerC. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1048–1073. doi:10.3102/0002831211435229
82.
Riegle-CrumbC.MooreC. (2014). The gender gap in high school physics: Considering the context of local communities. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 253–268. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12022parson
83.
SadlerP. M.SonnertG.HazariZ.TaiR. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411–427.
84.
SchmidtC. D.HardingeG. B.RokutaniL. J. (2012). Expanding the school counselor repertoire through STEM-focused career development. The Career Development Quarterly, 60, 25–35.
85.
SchneiderB.SwansonC. B.Riegle-CrumbC. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25–53.
86.
ShapiroC. A.SaxL. J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions For Institutional Research, 152, 5–18.
87.
ShoffnerM. F.NewsomeD.Barrio MintonC. A.Wachter MorrisC. A. (2015). A qualitative exploration of the STEM career-related outcome expectations of young adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 42, 102–116.
88.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613.
89.
SteeleC. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi and other clues to how stereotypes affect us. New York, NY: Norton.
90.
StuderJ. R. (2015). The essential school counselor in a changing society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91.
SyedM.GozaB. K.ChemersM. M.ZurbriggenE. L. (2012). Individual differences in preferences for matched-ethnic mentors among high-achieving ethnically diverse adolescents in STEM. Child Development, 83, 896–910. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01744.x
92.
TangM.PanW.NewmeyerM. (2008). Factors influencing high school students’ career aspirations. Professional School Counseling, 11, 285–295. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.285
93.
TerrellN. (2007). STEM occupations. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 51, 26–33.
94.
TrustyJ. (2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 464–474.
95.
TurnerS. L.LapanR. T. (2005). Evaluation of an intervention to increase non-traditional career interests and career-related self-efficacy among middle-school adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 516–531.
96.
TysonW.LeeR.BormanK. M.HansonM. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 12, 243–270.
97.
U.S. Department of Education Web Tables. (2012, 10). STEM in postsecondary education: Entrance, attrition, and course taking amount 2003-04 beginning postsecondary students (pp. 1–57). Author. Retrieved fromhttp://nces.ed.gov
98.
VanLeuvanP. (2004). Young women’s science/mathematics career goals from seventh grade to high school graduation. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 248–267.
99.
VilorioD. (2014). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow’s jobs. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Spring, 58, 4–12.
100.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S.KennyS. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24, 770–775.
101.
WangX. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1081–1121. doi: 0002831213488622
102.
WattH. M G.EcclesJ. S. (2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
103.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
104.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). New York, NY: Academic Press.
105.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.PintrichP. R. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148–185). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
