This study describes the nature and experience of professional conflict in relation to faculty satisfaction. Part of a longitudinal investigation of faculty identity development in education, this analysis concentrates on nine participants who spontaneously expressed disillusionment with their academic career and considered leaving higher education. Conflict narratives from multiple interviews are analyzed using the constant comparative method. Findings indicate that personal experiences of professional conflict correspond to an individual’s motivating force (source of meaningfulness) and disrupting force (interruption to meaningfulness), thus the disillusioning process evolves along a continuum of expectation and disposition, resulting in differential thresholds of faculty dissatisfaction. Furthermore, conflict is explored as a source of professional transformation and development of faculty identity.
Austin, A. E.
(2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.
2.
Baxter Magolda, M. B.
(2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
3.
Bensimon, E. M.
, Ward, K., & Sanders, K. (2000). The department chair’s role in developing new faculty into teachers and scholars. Bolton, MA: Anker.
4.
Boice, R.
(1993). Primal origins and later correctives for mid-career disillusionment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 55, 33-41.
5.
Bruss, K. V.
, & Kopala, M. (1993). Graduate school training in psychology: Its impact upon the development of professional identity. Psychotherapy, 30, 685-691.
6.
Cawyer, C. S.
, & Friedrich, G. W. (1998). Organizational socialization: Processes for new communication faculty. Communication Education, 47, 234-245.
7.
Corbin, J.
, & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
8.
Gaff, J. G.
, & Pruitt-Logan, A. S. (1998). Preparing college faculty. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 77-86.
9.
Gilligan, C.
(1993). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Golde, C. M.
, & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education (www.phd-survey.org; A report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts). Philadelphia: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
11.
Hagedorn, L. S.
(2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 5-20.
12.
Harter, S.
(1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford.
13.
Johnsrud, L. K.
(1993). Women and minority faculty experiences: Defining and responding to diverse realities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 53, 3-16.
14.
Johnsrud, L. K.
, & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518-542.
15.
Laden, B. V.
, & Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Job satisfaction among faculty of color in academe: Individual survivors or institutional transformers?New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 57-66.
16.
Mezirow, J.
(1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Olsen, D.
(1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 453-471.
18.
Olsen, D.
, Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 267-293.
19.
Patton, M. Q.
(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Reybold, L. E.
(2003). Pathways to the professorate: The development of faculty identity in education. The Journal of Innovative Higher Education, 27(4), 235-252.
21.
Riegel, K. F.
(1973). Dialectic operations: The final period of cognitive development. Human Development, 16, 346-370.
22.
Ropers-Huilman, B.
(2000). Aren’t you satisfied yet? Women faculty members’ interpretations of their academic work. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 21-32.
23.
Schrodt, P.
, Cawyer, C. S., & Sanders, R. (2003). An examination of academic mentoring behaviors and new faculty members’ satisfaction with socialization and tenure and promotion processes. Communication Education, 52(1), 17-29.
24.
Somers, P.
, Cofer, J., Austin, J. L., Inman, D., Martin, T., Rook, S., et al. (1998). Faculty and staff: The weather radar of campus climate. New Directions for Institutional Research, 98, 35-52.
25.
Trower, C. A.
, Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2001). Paradise lost: How the academy converts enthusiastic recruits into early-career doubters. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 53(9), 3-6.
