Shifting the attention from temporary to enduring competitive advantage, we theorize that family control of a business is a source of family-specific isolating mechanisms. These isolating mechanisms are based on path-dependent, socially complex, and inseparable resources that jointly enhance family firms’ ability to sustain competitive advantages vis-à-vis nonfamily firms. Longitudinal analyses of S&P 1500 manufacturing firms show that family firms are more likely to sustain superior performance than nonfamily firms. We also find that competitive advantages last longer in family firms that are older, have more family members involved, and a higher level of family ownership.
AlchianA. A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il Politico, 30, 816–829.
2.
AlvarezS. A.BusenitzL. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.
3.
AmitR.DingY.VillalongaB.ZhangH. (2015). The role of institutional development in the prevalence and performance of entrepreneur and family-controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 284–305.
4.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1327.
5.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73–106.
6.
BammensY.NotelaersG.Van GilsA. (2015). Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Family Business Review, 28, 123–144.
7.
BanalievaE. R.EddlestonK. A.ZellwegerT. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1358–1377.
BarneyJ. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Academy of Management Review, 11, 656–665.
10.
BarneyJ. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
11.
BecerraM.CruzC.GravesC. (2020). Innovation in family firms: The relative effects of wealth concentration versus family-centered goals. Family Business Review, 33, 372–392.
12.
BennedsenM.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2010). The governance of family firms. In BakerK. H.AndersonR. (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (pp. 371–389). Wiley.
13.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73–96.
14.
BoekerW. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 489–515.
15.
BurkartM.PanunziF.ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167–2202.
16.
BurtonM. D.BeckmanC. M. (2007). Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociological Review, 72, 239–266.
17.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21(2), 169–181.
18.
Cabrera-SuárezK.Saá-PérezP. D.García-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37–47.
19.
CampbellB. A.CoffR.KryscynskiD. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37, 376–395.
20.
CannellaA. A.JonesC. D.WithersM. C. (2015). Family-versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: Social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 436–459.
21.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.
22.
CastaniasR. P.HelfatC. E. (2001). The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 661–678.
23.
ChangS. J.ShimJ. (2015). When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance?Strategic Management Journal, 36, 197–1316.
24.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2016). Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 201–229.
25.
ChoiJ.WangH. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895–907.
26.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and nonfamily firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 335–354.
27.
ChrismanJ. J.MemiliE.MisraK. (2014). Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner’s curse: The influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1103–1127.
28.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976–997.
29.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19–39.
30.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103–1113.
31.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
CruzC. C.Gómez-MejíaL. R.BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 69–89.
33.
D’AveniR. A.DagninoG. B.SmithK. G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1371–1385.
34.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 362–389.
35.
DyerJ. H.SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
36.
EnsleyM. D.PearsonA. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 267–284.
37.
FangH.ChrismanJ. J.HoltD. T. (2021). Strategic persistence in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, 931–950.
38.
FossK.FossN. J. (2005). Resources and transaction costs: How property rights economics furthers the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 541–553.
FroneM. R.RussellM.CooperM. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.
41.
GeB.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2021). Mining the past: History scripting strategies and competitive advantage in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46, 223–251.
42.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145–1172.
43.
GeorgeG. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 661–676.
44.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.
45.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM.MakriM. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 226–237.
46.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81–95.
47.
GottschalgO.ZolloM. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32, 418–437.
48.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–26.
49.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM.MacMillanI. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451–465.
50.
HambrickD. C.GeletkanyczM. A.FredricksonJ. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401–418.
51.
HartO.MooreJ. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119–1158.
52.
HoopesD. G.MadsenT. L.WalkerG. (2003). Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889–902.
53.
JacobsenR. (1988). The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 415–430.
54.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 29–49.
55.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.ShanineK. K.KacmarK. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 309–341.
56.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theories of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
57.
JeongS.-H.KimH.KimH. (2022). Strategic nepotism in family director appointments: Evidence from family business groups in South Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 656–682.
58.
KimH.KimH.LeeP. M. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19, 404–418.
59.
KönigA.KammerlanderN.EndersA. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38, 418–441.
60.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263–1288.
61.
KotlarJ.SignoriA.De MassisA.VismaraS. (2018). Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1073–1099.
62.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2015). The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 397–415.
63.
Lengnick-HallC. A.Lengnick-HallM. L. (1988). Strategic human resources management: A review of the literature and a proposed typology. Academy of Management Review, 13, 454–470.
64.
LesterR. H.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2006). Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 755–775.
65.
LohwasserT. S.HochF.KellermannsF. W. (2022). Strength in stability: A meta-analysis of family firm performance moderated by institutional stability and regime type. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 117–158.
66.
LubatkinM. H.LingY.SchulzeW. S. (2007). An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 955–971.
67.
MazzolaP.MarchisioG.AstrachanJ. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21(3), 239–258.
68.
MadhokA.LiS.PriemR. L. (2010). The resource-based view revisited: Comparative firm advantage, willingness-based isolating mechanisms and competitive heterogeneity. European Management Review, 7, 91–100.
MakadokR. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.
71.
MalmendierU.TateG. (2009). Superstar CEOs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1593–1638.
72.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run. Harvard Business School Press:.
73.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829–858.
74.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34, 553–571.
75.
O’BoyleE. H.Jr.PollackJ. M.RutherfordM. W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 1–18.
ParkerS. (2016). Family firms and the “willing successor” problem. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 1241–1259.
78.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 617–627.
79.
PatelP. C.FietJ. O. (2011). Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1179–1197.
80.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949–969.
81.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
82.
RouseM. J.DaellenbachU. S. (1999). Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: Isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 487–494.
83.
RumeltR. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In TeeceD. (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 137–158). Ballinger.
84.
SasakiI.KotlarJ.RavasiD.VaaraE. (2020). Dealing with revered past: Historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 590–623.
85.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179–194.
86.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116.
87.
SchulzeW. S.ZellwegerT. (2021). Property rights, owner-management, and value creation. Academy of Management Review, 46, 489–511.
88.
SharmaP. (2008). Commentary: Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 971–977.
89.
SharmaP.ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 293–312.
90.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.
91.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A.IrelandR. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273–292.
92.
SteierL. (2001). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353–367.
93.
SydowJ.SchreyöggG.KochJ. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34, 689–709.
94.
ThietartR. A. (2016). Strategy dynamics: Agency, path dependency, and self-organized emergence. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 774–792.
95.
ThomasL. G.D’AveniR. A. (2009). The changing nature of competition in the U.S. manufacturing sector, 1950 to 2002. Strategic Organization, 7, 387–431.
96.
VaaraE.LambergJ. A. (2016). Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41, 633–657.
97.
van EssenM.CarneyM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. (2015). How does family control influence firm strategy and performance? A meta-analysis of US publicly listed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23, 3–24.
98.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1183–1205.
99.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417.
100.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource–based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.
101.
ZellwegerT. M. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20, 1–15.
102.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136–155.
