Based on stewardship theory and social role theory, we examine the bounded nature of nonfamily employees’ individual stewardship behaviors (i.e., organizational citizenship behavior, OCB) in family firms. We expect stewardship culture to make male (female) employees’ OCB more (less) affect-driven. In Study 1, we used data from family and nonfamily firms’ employees to establish the unique manifestation of stewardship in family firms. Study 2 was a diary study of nonfamily employees. As expected, for women, we found stewardship culture to attenuate the relationships between affect and OCB. For men, stewardship culture strengthened the relationship between affect and OCB.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490-1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
3.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
4.
AstrachanJ. H.KleinS. B.SmyrniosK. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x
5.
BaasM.de DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
6.
BarnesC. M.LucianettiL.BhaveD. P.ChristianM. S. (2015). “You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy”: Leaders’ sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1419-1437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1063
7.
BarnettT.KellermannsF. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00155.x
8.
BealD. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 383-407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335
9.
BinnewiesC.WörnleinS. C. (2011). What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.731
10.
BjursellC.BäckvallL. (2011). Family business women in media discourse: The business role and the mother role. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(2), 154-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231111167228
11.
BormannK. C. (2017). Linking daily ethical leadership to followers’ daily behaviour: The roles of daily work engagement and previous abusive supervision. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 590-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1331217
12.
BreevaartK.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.DerksD. (2016). Who takes the lead? A multi-source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2041
13.
BrotheridgeC. M.GrandeyA. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815
14.
ChrismanJ. J. (2019). Stewardship theory: Realism, relevance, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1051-1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719838472
15.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x
16.
DalalR. S.LamH.WeissH. M.WelchE. R.HulinC. L. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051-1066. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44636148
17.
DavisJ. H.AllenM. R.HayesH. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x
18.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
19.
DawsonA.IrvingP. G.SharmaP.ChiricoF.MarcusJ. (2013). Behavioural outcomes of next-generation family members’ commitment to their firm. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 570-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.781155
20.
De MassisA.FossN. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518803422
21.
DemeroutiE.RispensS. (2014). Improving the image of student-recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12048
22.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. John M. MacEachran memorial lecture series. Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
EaglyA. H.BealA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of gender (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
24.
EaglyA. H.CrowleyM. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
25.
EhrhartM. G.NaumannS. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 960-974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960
26.
EricksonR. J.RitterC. (2001). Emotional labor, burnout, and inauthenticity: Does gender matter?Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090130
27.
FrancisA. E. (1999). The daughter also rises: How women overcome obstacles and advance in the family-owned business. Rudi.
28.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS. (2004). Gender differences in relational and collective interdependence: Implications for self-views, social behavior, and subjective well-being. In EaglyA. H.BealA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 169-191). Guilford Press.
29.
GildingM. (2000). Family business and family change: Individual autonomy, democratization, and the new family business institutions. Family Business Review, 13(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00239.x
30.
HernandezM. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172-193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0363
31.
HoltD. T.MadisonK.KellermannsF. W. (2017). Variance in family members’ assessments. Family Business Review, 30(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516673700
32.
IliesR.ScottB. A.JudgeT. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794672
33.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.JenningsP. D. (2017). Is it better to govern managers via agency or stewardship? Examining asymmetries by family versus nonfamily affiliation. Family Business Review, 30(3), 262-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517717532
34.
KacmarK. M.BachrachD. G.HarrisK. J.ZivnuskaS. (2011). Fostering good citizenship through ethical leadership: Exploring the moderating role of gender and organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 633-642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021872
35.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.ZellwegerT. M. (2012). Extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: A look at the dark side. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00544.x
36.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1996). Family business: Human dilemmas in the family firm; text and cases. International Thomson Business Press.
37.
KidderD. L. (2002). The influence of gender on the performance of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 28(5), 629-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800504
38.
KidderD. L.ParksJ. M. (2001). The good soldier: Who is s(he)?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 939-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.119
39.
KoopmanJ.LanajK.ScottB. A. (2016). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414-435. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0262
40.
LeeK.AllenN. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
41.
LinS.-H. J.JohnsonR. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381-1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000018
42.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
43.
MadisonK.HoltD. T.KellermannsF. W.RanftA. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515594292
44.
MadisonK.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P. (2017). Coexisting agency and stewardship governance in family firms: An empirical investigation of individual-level and firm-level effects. Family Business Review, 30(4), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517727422
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
47.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.
NelsonT.ConstantinidisC. (2017). Sex and gender in family business succession research: A review and forward agenda from a social construction perspective. Family Business Review, 30(3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517715390
50.
NeubaumD. O.ThomasC. H.DibrellC.CraigJ. B. (2017). Stewardship climate scale: An assessment of reliability and validity. Family Business Review, 30(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516673701
51.
NezlekJ. B.FeistG. J.WilsonF. C.PleskoR. M. (2001). Day-to-Day variability in empathy as a function of daily events and mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516673701
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s nature, antecedents, and consequences. Foundations for organizational science. Sage.
54.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
55.
RiouxS. M.PennerL. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306
56.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
57.
SharmaP.IrvingP. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00067.x
58.
ShepherdD. A. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship. Family Business Review, 29(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516634943
59.
SirmonD. G.ArregleJ.-L.HittM. A.WebbJ. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic response to competitive threat. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 979-998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00267.x
60.
SpectorP. E.FoxS. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
61.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2017). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54-79. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894486517734683
62.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.
63.
ThompsonP. S.BergeronD. M.BolinoM. C. (2020). No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000481
64.
TimsM.BakkerA. B.XanthopoulouD. (2011). Do transformational leaders enhance their followers’ daily work engagement?Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.011
65.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
66.
WeissH. M.CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 1-74). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
67.
WheelerA. R.ShanineK. K.LeonM. R.WhitmanM. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12042
68.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
69.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.NeubaumD. O.DibrellC.CraigJ. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1035-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00271.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
