Drawing on upper echelons theory, this study examines how the traditionality of family chief executive officers (CEOs) influences the selection of their successors, and how this relationship is moderated by two dimensions of socioemotional wealth. Recognizing the central role of CEOs in determining successors, we show that a family CEO’s cultural values regarding traditionality have a significant positive effect on the probability that a family member is chosen as successor. We find that this relationship is strengthened by the family members’ identification with the firm and weakened by the family members’ sense of dynasty. Our contributions to theory and practice are discussed.
AhlstromD.BrutonG. D.YehK. S. (2007). Venture capital in China: Past, present, and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9032-1
3.
AhlstromD.ChenS. J.YehK. S. (2010). Managing in ethnic Chinese communities: Culture, institutions, and context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9218-4
4.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
5.
AnggadwitaG.ProfityoW. B.AlamandaD. T.PermatasariA. (2019). Cultural values and their implications to family business succession. Journal of Family Business Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2019-0017
AshforthB. E.HarrisonS. H.CorleyK. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
BennedsenM.FanJ. P.JianM.YehY. H. (2015). The family business map: Framework, selective survey, and evidence from Chinese family firm succession. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.008
12.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647-691. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
13.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
14.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R.LarrazakintanaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82-113. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82
15.
BersonY.OregS.DvirT. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.499
16.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.73
17.
BhattacherjeeA. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715
18.
BirtchT. A.AuY. F.ChiangF. F. T.HofmanP. S. (2018). How perceived risk and return interacts with familism to influence individuals’ investment strategies: The case of capital seeking and capital providing behavior in new venture financing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2), 471-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9525-0
19.
BlumentrittT. P.KeytA. D.AstrachanJ. H. (2007). Creating an environment for successful nonfamily CEOs: An exploratory study of good principals. Family Business Review, 20(4), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00102.x
20.
BoekerW.GoodsteinJ. (1993). Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 172-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/256517
21.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Sage.
22.
BrochetF.MillerG. S.NaranjoP.YuG. (2019). Managers’ cultural background and disclosure attributes. Accounting Review, 94(3), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52290
23.
BrutonG. D.AhlstromD.WanJ. C. (2003). Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.312
CampbellT. C.GallmeyerM.JohnsonS. A.RutherfordJ.StanleyB. W. (2011). CEO optimism and forced turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 695-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.004
26.
CannellaA. A.LubatkinM. (1993). Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 763-793.
ChangJ. C. J.KingW. R. (2005). Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 85-115.
29.
ChangS. J.ShimJ. (2015). When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance?Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1297-1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2289
30.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351-386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
31.
ChenZ. X.AryeeS. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24162389
32.
ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.SteierL. P.ChuaJ. H. (2013). The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1249-1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12064
33.
ChristensenD. M.DhaliwalD. S.BoivieS.GraffinS. D. (2015). Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1918-1938. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2313
34.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12155
35.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
36.
CollinsW. A.MaccobyE. E.SteinbergL.HetheringtonE. M.BornsteinM. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55(2), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218
37.
CrosslandC.HambrickD. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.913
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.PearsonA. W.MahtoR. V. (2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.041
40.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12015
De MassisA.FossN. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518803422
43.
De MassisA.SiegerP.ChuaJ. H.VismaraS. (2016). Incumbents’ attitude toward intrafamily succession: An investigation of its antecedents. Family Business Review, 29(3), 278-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516656276
44.
De MassisA.WangH.ChuaJ. H. (2019). Counterpoint: How heterogeneity among family firms influences organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 19(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1419808
45.
Den HartogD. N.KoopmanP. L. (2001). Leadership in organizations. In AndersonN.OnesD. S.Kepir SinangilH.ViswesvaranC. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (pp. 166-187). Sage.
46.
DouJ.LiS. (2013). The succession process in Chinese family firms: A guanxi perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 893-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9287-7
47.
DuQ.YuF.YuX. (2017). Cultural proximity and the processing of financial information. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2703-2726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001028
48.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00056-2
49.
ErdoganI.RondiE.De MassisA. (2019). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 20-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719839712
50.
FarhJ. L.EarleyP. C.LinS. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393733
51.
FarhJ. L.HackettR. D.LiangJ. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in china: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25530866
52.
FuX.ZhangZ. (2019). CFO cultural background and stock price crash risk. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 62, 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.001
53.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1010-1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429990
54.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press.
55.
GerstnerW. C.KönigA.EndersA.HambrickD. C. (2013). CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 257-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213488773
56.
GibersonT. R.ResickC. J.DicksonM. W.MitchelsonJ. K.RandallK. R.ClarkM. A. (2009). Leadership and organizational culture: Linking CEO characteristics to cultural values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9109-1
57.
GildingM.GregoryS.CossonB. (2015). Motives and outcomes in family business succession planning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12040
58.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
59.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.NúñeznickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.MoyanofuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
60.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.HambrickD. C. (2018). Evenhandedness in resource allocation: Its relationship with CEO ideology, organizational discretion, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1848-1868. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1155
61.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1995). Multivariate date analysis with readings. Prentice-Hall.
62.
HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 844-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/256761
63.
HallA.MelinL.NordqvistM. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00193.x
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
66.
HekmanD. R.SteensmaH. K.BigleyG. A.HerefordJ. F. (2009). Effects of organizational and professional identification on the relationship between administrators’ social influence and professional employees’ adoption of new work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1325-1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015315
67.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111002
68.
HoltD. T.PearsonA. W.PayneG. T.SharmaP. (2018). Family business research as a boundary-spanning platform. Family Business Review, 31(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518758712
HuiC.LeeC.RousseauD. M. (2004). Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?Organization Science, 15(2), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0050
71.
HutzschenreuterT.KleindienstI.GregerC. (2015). What determines demographic similarity between incumbent CEOs and their successors? A CEO informal power perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 36(7), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2679
72.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511414271
73.
JiangD. S.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P.MorrisM. L. (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31(1), 125-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517736959
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.KosalkaT. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004
76.
KammerlanderN.DessiC.BirdM.FlorisM.MurruA. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777
KelleciR.LambrechtsF.VoordeckersW.HuybrechtsJ. (2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518811222
79.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2007). A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1048-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018
80.
Kets de VriesM. F. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90071-8
81.
KlotzA. C.NeubaumD. O. (2016). Article commentary: Research on the dark side of personality traits in entrepreneurship: Observations from an organizational behavior perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12214
82.
KochJ. (2011). Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32(3), 337-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610397486
83.
LajoieD.BoudriasJ. S.RousseauV.BrunelleÉ. (2017). Value congruence and tenure as moderators of transformational leadership effects. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2015-0091
84.
LansbergI.AstrachanJ. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00039.x
85.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
86.
LeeJ. S.ZhaoG.LuF. (2019). The effect of value congruence between founder and successor on successor’s willingness: The mediating role of the founder–successor relationship. Family Business Review, 32(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519840248
87.
LeeK. S.LimG. H.LimW. S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10899446
88.
LiJ.TangY. I. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912
89.
LiaoY.LiuX. Y.KwanH. K.LiJ. (2015). Work–family effects of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2119-6
LongR. G.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Management succession in family business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of family business (pp. 249-268). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247556.n13
92.
LovelaceJ. B.BundyJ.HambrickD. C.PollockT. G. (2018). The shackles of CEO celebrity: Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 419-444. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0064
93.
LumpkinG. T.MartinW.VaughnM. (2008). Family orientation: Individual-level influences on family firm outcomes. Family Business Review, 21(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00120.x
94.
MahtoR. V.DavisP. S.PearceJ. A.RobinsonR. B.Jr. (2010). Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 985-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00393.x
95.
MarlerL. E.BoteroI. C.De MassisA. V. (2017). Succession-related role transitions in family firms: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29(1), 57-81.
96.
McColganP.HillierD. (2009). Firm performance, entrenchment and managerial succession in family firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3-4), 461-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02138.x
97.
MengesJ. I.KilduffM. (2015). Group emotions: Cutting the Gordian knots concerning terms, levels of analysis, and processes. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 845-928. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1033148
98.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. L.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.
99.
MillerD.WiklundJ.YuW. (2020). Mental health in the family business: A conceptual model and a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719837987
100.
MinichilliA.CorbettaG.MacMillanI. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: “Familiness,” “faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x
101.
NadkarniS.ChenJ. (2014). Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1810-1833. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0401
102.
NeterJ.WassermanW.KutnerM. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs (2nd ed.). Richard D. Irwin.
103.
NguyenD. D.HagendorffJ.EshraghiA. (2017). Does a CEO’s cultural heritage affect performance under competitive pressure?Review of Financial Studies, 31(1), 97-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx046
104.
NguyenP.RahmanN.ZhaoR. (2018). CEO characteristics and firm valuation: A quantile regression analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 22(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9383-7
105.
NicholsonN. (2008). Evolutionary psychology and family business: A new synthesis for theory, research, and practice. Family Business Review, 21(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00111.x
106.
ParkerS. C. (2016). Family firms and the “willing successor” problem. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(6), 1241-1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12242
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
109.
PillutlaM. M.FarhJ. L.LeeC.LinZ. (2007). An investigation of traditionality as a moderator of reward allocation. Group & Organization Management, 32(2), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106288067
110.
RavlinE. C.ThomasD. C.IlsevA. (2000). Beliefs about values, status, and legitimacy in multicultural groups. In EarleyP. C.SinghH. (Eds.), Innovations in international and cross-cultural management (pp. 17-51). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452205502.n2
RuggieriR.PozziM.RipamontiS. (2014). Italian family business cultures involved in the generational change. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i1.625
113.
SchepersJ.VoordeckersW.SteijversT.LaverenE. (2014). The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9533-5
114.
SchulzeW. S.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12159
115.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.PabloA. L.ChuaJ. H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500302
116.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2020). Family firm behavior from a psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719879675
ShepherdD. A. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship: Stocks, flows, reactions, and responses. Family Business Review, 29(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516634943
119.
SmithC. J.LangC. M.KryzakL.ReichenbergA.HollanderE.SilvermanJ. M. (2009). Familial associations of intense preoccupations, an empirical factor of the restricted, repetitive behaviors and interests domain of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(8), 982-990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02060.x
120.
SorensonR. L.GoodpasterK. E.HedbergP. R.YuA. (2009). The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance: An exploratory test. Family Business Review, 22(3), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509332456
121.
SpreitzerG. M.PerttulaK. H.XinK. (2005). Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.315
122.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511421665
123.
SuE.CarneyM. (2013). Can China’s family firms create intellectual capital?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9302-z
124.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2018). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517734683
TsuiA. S.FarhJ. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work & Occupations, 24(1), 56-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888497024001005
127.
TurnerJ. C.BrownR. J.TajfelH. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
128.
VandekerkhofP.SteijversT.HendriksW.VoordeckersW. (2015). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 28(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513514274
129.
WangH. H.LuC.LuL. (2014). Do people with traditional values suffer more from job insecurity? The moderating effects of traditionality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.712751
130.
WangJ.WangG. G.RuonaW. E.RojewskiJ. W. (2005). Confucian values and the implications for international HRD. Human Resource Development International, 8(3), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500143285
131.
WuX.KwanH. K.WuL. Z.MaJ. (2018). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3006-5
YangK. S. (1993). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In ChengL. Y.CheungF. M. C.ChenC. N. (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers for the first international conference (pp. 19-56). The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
134.
YangK. S. (2003). Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang-Kuo Hwang and beyond. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00126.x
135.
YangK. S.YuA.YehM. (1989). Chinese individual modernity and traditionality: Construct definition and measurement. In Proceedings of the interdisciplinary conference on Chinese psychology behavior (pp. 287-354).
136.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x
137.
ZahraS. A.NeweyL. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00848.x
138.
ZajacE. J. (1990). CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110304
139.
ZellwegerT. M.EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003
140.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851-868. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
141.
ZellwegerT. M.SiegerP.HalterF. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
142.
ZhangA. Y.SongL. J.TsuiA. S.FuP. P. (2014). Employee responses to employment-relationship practices: The role of psychological empowerment and traditionality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 809-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1929
