To investigate the complex dynamics when family members with differing perceptions and interpretations of reality jointly lead their family business, this research adopts an epistemic-operative interview technique using Morgan’s images of organization. We explore how family leaders’ root metaphors, which are symbolic frames that help understand individuals’ attitudes and behaviors, are linked to family businesses’ behavior and performance. Analyzing six Italian family hotels, we derive four structures of family symbolic meanings and explain how and why relationships and innovation are mechanisms through which firm performance is related and connected to the offshoots of the meanings of family leaders’ root metaphors.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
2.
Binz AstrachanC.BoteroI. C. (2018). “We are a family firm”: An exploration of the motives for communicating the family business brand. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-01-2017-0002
3.
Blanco-MazagatosV.de Quevedo-PuenteE.Delgado-GarcíaJ. B. (2016). How agency conflict between family managers and family owners affects performance in wholly family-owned firms: A generational perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.003
4.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x
CornelissenJ. P.ClarkeJ. S.CienkiA. (2012). Sensegiving in entrepreneurial contexts: The use of metaphors in speech and gesture to gain and sustain support for novel business ventures. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610364427
8.
CrittendenW. F.AthanassiouN.KellyL. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002500202
9.
CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12(4), 311-323.
12.
De MassisA.FossN. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386-396.
13.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12102
14.
De MassisA.SharmaP.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781002988
FabbriD.MunariA. (2002). I laboratori di epistemologia operativa. [The epistemic operative laboratories] In DemetrioD.FabbriD.GherardiS. (Eds.), Apprendere nelle organizzazioni. Proposte per la crescita cognitiva in età adulta [Learning in organizations. Suggestions for cognitive growth in adulthood] (pp. 239-251). Carocci.
17.
FabbriD.MunariA. (2005). Strategie del sapere. Verso una psicologia culturale [Strategies of knowledge. Toward a cultural psychology]. Guerini e Associati.
18.
FiolC. M. (1991). Seeing the empty spaces: Towards a more complex understanding of the meaning of power in organizations. Organization Studies, 12(4), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069101200405
19.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
20.
FiskeS. T.MacraeC. N. (Eds.). (2012). The Sage handbook of social cognition. Sage.
21.
FrisonD. (2014). Dialogare con le immagini. L’uso delle immagini nella ricerca e nella formazione esperienziale [Conversing with images. The use of images in research and expriential learning]. In FrontaniM. L.MengatoL. (Eds.), Experiential learning: Metodi, tecniche e strumenti per il debriefing [Experiential learning: Debriefing methods, tecniques and tools] (pp. 73-86). FrancoAngeli.
22.
FrisonD. (2016). L’intervista mediata: evoluzioni dell’intervista cognitivo-critica piagetiana [The mediated interview: New developments of the cognitive-critical interview of Jean Piaget]. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 13, 193-211. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2016-013-fris
GiessnerS. R.SchubertT. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001
25.
GolemanD.BoyatzisR. E. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
26.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
27.
GreimasA. (1966). Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode [Structural semantics: An attempt at a method]. Larousse.
28.
HabbershonT. G.PistruiJ. (2002). Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00223.x
29.
HeracleousL.JacobsC. D. (2008). Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors. Organization Studies, 29(1), 45-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607086637
30.
HillR. C.LevenhagenM. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1057-1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100603
31.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
32.
JaskiewiczP.DyerW. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517700469
33.
JiangD. S.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P.MorrisM. L. (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31(1), 125-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517736959
34.
JungC. G. (1976). The symbolic life: miscellaneous writings. Princeton University Press.
KammerlanderN.DessìC.BirdM.FlorisM.MurruA. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777
37.
KönigA.KammerlanderN.EndersA. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418-441. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162
38.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065
39.
LacanJ. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis (SheridanA., Trans.). Hogarth Press.
MahlerM. S.PineF.BergmanA. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. Basic Books.
43.
McGregorD. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
44.
Michael-TsabariN.TanW. L. (2013). Exploring family features in non-family organizations: The family metaphor and its behavioral manifestations. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(3), 391-424. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2012-0018
45.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
NeubaumD. O. (2018). Family business research: Roads travelled and the search for unworn paths. Family Business Review, 31(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518792948
49.
NeumannE. (2015). The great mother. An analysis of the archetype (3rd ed.; ManheimR., Trans.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518792948
50.
OlsonD. H.RussellC. S.SprenkleD. H. (1989). Circumplex model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families. Haworth Press.
51.
PayneG. T. (2018). Reflections on family business research: Considering domains and theory. Family Business Review, 31(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776550
52.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
53.
PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (1993). Organizations, emotion and the myth of rationality. In FinemanS. (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 36-57). Sage.
54.
QuinnR. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass.
55.
RecalcatiM. (2015). Le mani della madre [The hands of the mother]. Feltrinelli.
56.
RecalcatiM. (2019). Il complesso di Telemaco. Genitori e figli dopo il tramonto del padre [The Telemachus Complex. Parents and children after the decline of the father] (5th ed.). Feltrinelli.
57.
RosenblattP. C. (1994). Metaphors of family systems theory toward new constructions. Guilford Press.
58.
SalvatoC.CorbettaG. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26(3), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513490796
59.
SmithR. C.EisenbergE. M. (1987). Conflict at Disneyland: A root-metaphor analysis. Communication Monographs, 54(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390239
60.
SteffensP.DavidssonP.FitzsimmonsJ. (2009). Performance configurations over time: Implications for growth-and profit-oriented strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00283.x
TsoukasH. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566-585. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279478
64.
TsoukasH. (1993). Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organization Studies, 14(3), 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400301
65.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
