BarretoI.PatientD. L. (2013). Toward a theory of intraorganizational attention based on desirability and feasibility factors. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 687-703.
2.
BatemanT. S.O’NeillH.Kenworthy-U’RenA. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of top managers’ goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1134-1148.
3.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
4.
BersonY.HalevyN. (2014). Hierarchy, leadership, and construal fit. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 20, 232-246.
5.
BosmaN.HesselsJ.SchutjensV.PraagM. V.VerheulI. (2012). Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 410-424.
6.
BreugstN.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A.AguinisH. (2012). Relationship conflict improves team performance assessment accuracy: Evidence from a multilevel study. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 187-206.
7.
DalpiazE.TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2014). Succession narratives in family business: The case of Alessi. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1375-1394.
8.
De MassisA.FossN. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31, 386-396.
9.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 337-360.
10.
Diaz-MorianaV.ClintonE.KammerlanderN.LumpkinG. T.CraigJ. B. (2018). Innovation motives in family firms: A transgenerational view. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1042258718803051
11.
GimenoJ.FoltaT. B.CooperA. C.WooC. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750-783.
12.
HansenJ.AlvesH.TropeY. (2016). Psychological distance reduces literal imitation: Evidence from an imitation-learning paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42, 320-330.
13.
KalksteinD. A.KleimanT.WakslakC. J.LibermanN.TropeY. (2016). Social learning across psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 1-19.
14.
KammerlanderN.GanterM. (2015). An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 361-383.
15.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2007). A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1048-1057.
16.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2014). Temporal considerations in the study of family firms: Reflections on “the study of organizational behaviour in family business.”European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23, 669-673.
17.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
18.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1149-1169.
19.
RamosH. M.ManT. W. Y.MustafaM.NgZ. Z. (2014). Psychological ownership in small family firms: Family and non-family employees’ work attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 300-311.
20.
SagristanoM. D.TropeY.LibermanN. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 364-376.
21.
ShepherdD. A. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship: Stocks, flows, reactions, and responses. Family Business Review, 29, 151-158.
22.
SoderbergC. K.CallahanS. P.KochersbergerA. O.AmitE.LedgerwoodA. (2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 525-548.
23.
SteinbachA. L.GamacheD. L.JohnsonR. E. (2018). Don’t get it misconstrued: Construal level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0273
24.
StrikeV. M.MichelA.KammerlanderN. (2017). Unpacking the black box of family business advising: Insights from psychology. Family Business Review, 31, 80-124.
25.
TumasjanA.WelpeI.SpörrleM. (2013). Easy now, desirable later: The moderating role of temporal distance in opportunity evaluation and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 859-888.
26.
ValcourM. (2007). Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1512-1523.
27.
WiesenfeldB. M.ReytJ.-N.BrocknerJ.TropeY. (2017). Construal level theory in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 367-400.