Family Social Capital in the Family Firm: A Taxonomic Classification,Relationships With Outcomes,and Directions for Advancement

Abstract

The unique form of social capital among family involved in the business, or family social capital (FSC), has both positive and negative effects on the family firm. To better understand how FSC exists across family firms and advance related theory, we develop a taxonomy of FSC. Using configuration analyses on two samples of family firms, we find that three clusters of family firms exist, which include firms with Instrumental, Identifiable, and Indistinguishable FSC. The specific configurations of each cluster are noted, and effects on economic and noneconomic outcomes are identified to advance understanding of the heterogeneous nature of family firms.

Keywords

family social capital taxonomy heterogeneity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

P. S.

Kwon

S. W.

(2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.

Arregle

J. L.

Hitt

M. A.

Sirmon

D. G.

Very

(2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.

Astrachan

J. H.

Dean

L. K.

(2001). Arthur Mass Mutual American Family Business Survey 1995 and 1997. In Astrachan

J. H.

Dean

L. K.

(Eds.), Databases for the study of entrepreneurship (pp. 289-304). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.

Astrachan

J. H.

Klein

S. B.

Smyrnios

K. X.

(2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x

Bird

Welsch

Astrachan

J. H.

Pistrui

(2002). Family business research: The evolution of an academic field. Family Business Review, 15, 337-350.

Björnberg

Å.

Nicholson

. (2007). The family climate scales: Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20, 229-246.

Bliese

P. D.

Lang

J. W.

(2016). Understanding relative and absolute change in discontinuous growth models: Coding alternatives and implications for hypothesis testing. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 562-592.

Bubolz

M. M.

(2001). Family as source, user, and builder of social capital. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 129-131.

Burt

R. S.

(1992). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.

10.

Cabrera-Suárez

M. K.

Déniz-Déniz

M. C.

Martín-Santana

J. D.

(2015). Family social capital, trust within the TMT, and the establishment of corporate goals related to nonfamily stakeholders. Family Business Review, 28, 145-162.

11.

Cabrera-Suárez

De Saá-Pérez

García-Almeida

(2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-46.

12.

Carlock

R. S.

Ward

J. L.

(2001). Strategic planning for the family business: parallel planning to unify the family and business. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

Carnes

C. M.

Ireland

R. D.

(2013). Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1399-1419.

14.

Carney

(2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.

15.

Carr

J. C.

Cole

M. S.

Ring

J. K.

Blettner

D. P.

(2011). A measure of variations in internal social capital among family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1207-1227.

16.

Chang

E. P.

Memili

Chrisman

J. J.

Kellermanns

F. W.

Chua

J. H.

(2009). Family social capital, venture preparedness, and start-up decisions: A study of Hispanic entrepreneurs in New England. Family Business Review, 22, 279-292.

17.

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

Pearson

A. W.

Barnett

(2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.

18.

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

Steier

(2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 237-247.

19.

Chrisman

J. J.

Sharma

Steier

L. P.

Chua

J. H.

(2013). The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1249-1261.

20.

Chua

J. H.

Chrisman

J. J.

Sharma

(1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19-39.

21.

Chua

J. H.

Chrisman

J. J.

Steier

L. P.

Rau

S. B.

(2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113.

22.

Coleman

J. S.

(1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 291-321.

24.

Collis

D. J.

(1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15(Suppl. 1), 143-152.

25.

Conway

J. M.

Huffcutt

A. I.

(2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147-168.

26.

Daspit

J. J.

Chrisman

J. J.

Sharma

Pearson

A. W.

Mahto

R. V.

(2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293-300.

27.

Daspit

J. J.

Long

R. G.

Pearson

A. W.

(2018). How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm. Journal of Family Business Strategy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003

28.

Daspit

J. J.

Madison

Barnett

Long

R. G.

(2018). The emergence of bifurcation bias from unbalanced families: Examining HR practices in the family firm using circumplex theory. Human Resource Management Review, 28, 18-32.

29.

De Clercq

Belausteguigoitia

. (2015). Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: The critical roles of conflict management and social capital. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 178-189.

30.

De Massis

Kotlar

Campopiano

Cassia

. (2013). Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4, 166-175. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.05.001

31.

Denzin

N. K.

(1978). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. Sociological Methods, 339-357.

32.

Dess

G. G.

Davis

P. S.

(1984). Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 467-487.

33.

Dess

G. G.

Shaw

J. D.

(2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 446-456.

34.

Doty

D. H.

Glick

W. H.

Huber

G. P.

(1993). Fit, equifinality, and organisational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1196-1250.

35.

Duran

Kammerlander

van Essen

Zellweger

(2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1224-1264.

36.

Eddleston

K. A.

Kellermanns

F. W.

Sarathy

(2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 26-50.

37.

Eddleston

Otondo

Kellermanns

F. W.

(2008). Conflict, participative decision making, and multi-generational ownership: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 456-484.

38.

Ensley

M. D.

Pearson

A. W.

(2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 267-284.

39.

Fabrigar

L. R.

Wegener

D. T.

MacCallum

R. C.

Strahan

E. J.

(1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.

40.

Fiss

P. C.

(2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198.

41.

García-Álvarez

López-Sintas

(2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14, 209-230.

42.

Geletkanycz

M. A.

(1997). The salience of “culture’s consequences”: The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 615-634.

43.

Gersick

K. E.

Davis

J. A.

Hampton

M. M.

Lansberg

(1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

44.

Haas

J. E.

Hall

R. H.

Johnson

N. J.

(1966). Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of organizations. In Bowers

R. V.

(Ed.), Studies on behavior in organizations (pp. 157-180). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

45.

Habbershon

T. G.

Pistrui

(2002). Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15, 223-237.

46.

Habbershon

T. G.

Williams

(1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25.

47.

Habbershon

T. G.

Williams

MacMillan

I. C.

(2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.

48.

Hambrick

D. C.

(1984). Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Management, 10, 27-41.

49.

Herrero

(2018). How familial is family social capital? Analyzing bonding social capital in family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 31, 441-459.

50.

Holt

D. T.

Pearson

A. W.

Carr

J. C.

Barnett

(2017). Family firm(s) outcomes model: Structuring financial and nonfinancial outcomes across the family and firm. Family Business Review, 30, 182-202.

51.

Holt

D. T.

Rutherford

M. W.

Kuratko

D. F.

(2010). Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23, 76-88.

52.

Homburg

Jensen

Krohmer

(2008). Configurations of marketing and sales: A taxonomy. Journal of Marketing, 72, 133-154.

53.

Hoy

McDougall

P. P.

D’Souza

D. E.

(1992). Strategies and environments of high growth firms. In Sexton

D. L.

Kasarda

J. D.

(Eds.), The state of art of entrepreneurship (pp. 341-357). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.

54.

Janis

I. L.

(1981). Counseling on personal decisions: Theory and research on short-term helping relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

55.

Jick

T. D.

(1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.

56.

Kerlinger

F. N.

Lee

H. B.

(2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.

57.

Ketchen

D. J.

Shook

C. L.

(1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 441-458.

58.

Khayesi

J. N.

George

Antonakis

(2014). Kinship in entrepreneur networks: Performance effects of resource assembly in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1323-1342.

59.

Khelil

(2016). The many faces of entrepreneurial failure: Insights from an empirical taxonomy. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 72-94.

60.

Klein

S. B.

Astrachan

J. H.

Smyrnios

K. X.

(2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-339.

61.

Koch

M. J.

McGrath

R. G.

(1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 335-354.

62.

König

Kammerlander

Enders

(2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38, 418-441.

63.

Kotlar

De Massis

(2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.

64.

Leana

C. R.

Van Buren

H. J.

(1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 538-555.

65.

Le Breton-Miller

Miller

. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731-746.

66.

Lindell

M. K.

Whitney

D. J.

(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121.

67.

McDougall

Robinson

R. B.

Jr. (1990). New venture strategies: An empirical identification of eight “archetypes” of competitive strategies for entry. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 447-467.

68.

McIntyre

R. M.

Blashfield

R. K.

(1980). A nearest-centroid technique for evaluating the minimum-variance clustering procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 225-238.

69.

McKelvey

(1975). Guidelines for the empirical classification of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 509-525.

70.

McMahon

R. G.

(2001). Business growth and performance and the financial reporting practices of Australian manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 152-164.

71.

Melin

Nordqvist

(2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5, 321-333.

72.

Meyer

A. D.

Tsui

A. S.

Hinings

C. R.

(1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1175-1195.

73.

Miller

(1996). Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 505-512.

74.

Miller

Friesen

P. H.

(1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24, 921-933.

75.

Miller

Friesen

P. H.

(1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30, 1161-1183.

76.

Miller

Le Breton-Miller

(2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73-87.

77.

Milligan

G. W.

(1996). Clustering validation: Results and implications for applied analyses. In Arabie

Hubert

L. J.

De Soetes

(Eds.), Clustering and classification (pp. 341-375). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.

78.

Milligan

G. W.

Hirtle

S. C.

(2003). Clustering and classification methods. In Schinka

J. A.

Velicer

W. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 165-186). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

79.

Mintzberg

(1979). An emerging strategy of “direct” research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 582-589.

80.

Mustakallio

Autio

Zahra

S. A.

(2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15, 205-222.

81.

Nahapiet

Ghoshal

(1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.

82.

Labianca

Chung

M. H.

(2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569-582.

83.

Olson

D. H.

(2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167.

84.

Payne

G. T.

(2006). Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organization Science, 17, 756-770.

85.

Payne

G. T.

Moore

C. B.

Griffis

S. E.

Autry

C. W.

(2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37, 491-520.

86.

Pearson

Carr

Shaw

(2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.

87.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J. Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.

88.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.

89.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Organ

D. W.

(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.

90.

Pugh

D. S.

Hickson

D. J.

Hinings

C. R.

Turner

(1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 65-105.

91.

Punj

Stewart

D. W.

(1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134-148.

92.

Rich

(1992). The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design. Academy of Management Review, 17, 758-781.

93.

Robinson

R. B.

Pearce

J. A.

(1988). Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 43-60.

94.

Ruscio

Roche

(2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24, 282-292.

95.

Rutherford

M. W.

Buller

P. F.

McMullen

P. R.

(2003). Human resource management problems over the life cycle of small to medium-sized firms. Human Resource Management, 42, 321-335.

96.

Rutherford

M. W.

Muse

L. A.

Oswald

S. L.

(2006). A new perspective on the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review, 19, 317-333.

97.

Salvato

Melin

(2008). Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 21, 259-276.

98.

Sanchez

J. C.

(1993). The long and thorny way to an organizational taxonomy. Organization Studies, 14, 73-92.

99.

Sanchez-Ruiz

Maldonado-Bautista

Rutherford

(2018). Business stressors, family-business identity, and divorce in family business: A vulnerability-stress-adaptation (VSA) model. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9, 167-179.

100.

Sarle

W. S.

(1983). Cubic clustering criterion (SAS Technical Report A-108). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

101.

Schaller

T. K.

Patil

Malhotra

N. K.

(2015). Alternative techniques for assessing common method variance: an analysis of the theory of planned behavior research. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 177-206.

102.

Schulze

W. S.

Lubatkin

M. H.

Dino

R. N.

(2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.

103.

Sharma

(2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.

104.

Sharma

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

(1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1-35.

105.

Short

J. C.

Payne

G. T.

Ketchen

D. J.

Jr. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34, 1053-1079.

106.

Sirmon

D. G.

Hitt

M. A.

(2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.

107.

Steier

Chrisman

J. J.

Chua

J. H.

(2015). Governance challenges in family businesses and business families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 1265-1280.

108.

Teece

D. J.

Pisano

Shuen

(1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.

109.

Tokarczyk

Hansen

Green

Down

(2007). A resource-based view and market orientation theory examination of the role of “familiness” in family business success. Family Business Review, 20, 17-31.

110.

Tsai

Ghoshal

(1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.

111.

Ulrich

McKelvey

(1990). General organizational classification: An empirical test using the United States and Japanese electronics industries. Organization Science, 1, 99-118.

112.

Waller

R. A.

Duncan

D. B.

(1969). A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1484-1503.

113.

Ward

J. H.

(1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.

114.

Ward

J. L.

(1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10, 323-337.

115.

Whetten

D. A.

(1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.

116.

Wiklund

Nordqvist

Hellerstedt

Bird

(2013). Internal versus external ownership transition in family firms: An embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1319-1340.

117.

Williams

L. J.

Hartman

Cavazotte

(2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477-514.

118.

Winter

S. G.

(2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 981-996.

119.

Winter

S. G.

(2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991-995.

120.

Lumpkin

G. T.

Sorenson

R. L.

Brigham

K. H.

(2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 33-57.

121.

Zahra

S. A.

Hayton

J. C.

Neubaum

D. O.

Dibrell

Craig

(2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1035-1054.