AbellP.FelinT.FossN. (2008). Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489-502.
2.
AguinisH.BoydB. K.PierceC. A.ShortJ. C. (2011). Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37, 395-403.
3.
ArnoldM. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
BarneyJ. B.FelinT. (2013). What are microfoundations?Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138-155.
5.
BeckS.PrüglR. (2018). Family firm reputation and humanization: Consumers and the trust advantage of family firms under different conditions of brand familiarity. Family Business Review, 31(4), 460-482. doi:10.1177/0894486518792692
6.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
7.
BozekY.Di VitoJ. (2018). Founder-controlled firms and R&D investments: New evidence from Canada. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486518793237
8.
BridouxF.StoelhorstJ. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 107-125.
9.
BrinkerinkJ. (2018). Broad search, deep search, and the absorptive capacity performance of family and nonfamily firm R&D. Family Business Review, 31, 295-317.
10.
BrundinE.SharmaP. (2012). Love, hate, and desire: The role of emotional messiness in the business family. In CarsrudA. L.BrännbackM. (Eds.), Understanding family businesses (pp. 55-71). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
Cabrera-SuárezM. K.García-AlmeidaD. J.De Saá-PérezP. (2018). A dynamic network model of the successor’s knowledge construction from the resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 31, 178-197.
12.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.MinolaM.VismaraS. (2016). Management processes and strategy execution in family firms: From “what” to “how”. Small Business Economics, 47, 719-734.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA.WangH. (2018). Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9, 107-113.
14.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multi-stakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29, 44-64.
16.
De BondtW. F.ThalerR. H. (1995). Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 9, 385-410.
17.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 344-364.
18.
De MassisA.SharmaP.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
19.
De MassisA.SiegerP.ChuaJ. H.VismaraS. (2016). Incumbents’ attitude toward intrafamily succession: An investigation of its antecedents. Family Business Review, 29, 278-300.
20.
FelinT.FossN. J. (2005), Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3, 441-455.
21.
FelinT.FossN.HeimeriksK.MadsenT. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351-1374.
22.
FelinT.FossN. J.PloyhartR. (2015). Microfoundations for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 575-632.
23.
FelinT.HesterlyW. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195-218.
24.
ForgasJ. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
25.
GavettiG. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599-617.
26.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
27.
HayekF. A. (Ed.). (1967). The results of human action but not of human design. In Studies in philosophy, politics and economics (pp. 96-105). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
28.
HaywardM. L.HambrickD. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 103-127.
29.
HelmsH. M. (2013). Marital relationships in the twenty-first century. In PetersonG. W.BushK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (3rd ed., pp. 233-254). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
HollensbeE.WookeyC.HickeyL.GeorgeG.CardinalV. N. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1227-1234.
32.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87-108.
33.
JaskiewiczP.DyerW. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 111-118.
34.
JiangD. S.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P.MorrisM. L. (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31, 125-157.
35.
JiangD. S.MunyonT. P. (2017). More than a feeling: The promise of experimental approaches for building the affective and cognitive microfoundations of family firm behavior. In KellermannsF.HoyF. (Eds.), Routledge companion to family business (pp. 385-400). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
37.
KotlarJ.SiegerP. (2018). Bounded rationality and bounded reliability: A study of non-family managers’ entrepreneurial behavior in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1042258718796085
38.
KotlarJ.SignoriA.De MassisA.VismaraS. (2018). Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1073-1099.
39.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305-328.
40.
LiJ.TangY. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 45-68.
41.
LittleD. (2006). Levels of the social. In GabbayD.ThagardP.WoodsJ. (Eds.), Handbook for philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 343-372). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
42.
MillerK.PentlandB.ChoiS. (2012). Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1536-1558.
43.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjöbergK.WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20, 33-47.
44.
NeckebrouckJ.SchulzeW.ZellwegerT. (2018). Are family firms good employers?Academy of Management Journal, 61, 553-585.
45.
NeubaumD. (2018). Family business research: Roads travelled and the search for unworn paths. Family Business Review, 31, 259-270.
46.
NicholsonN. (2008). Evolutionary psychology and family business: A new synthesis for theory, research, and practice. Family Business Review, 21, 103-118.
47.
OuA. Y.TsuiA. S.KinickiA. J.WaldmanD. A.XiaoZ.SongL. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 34-72.
48.
OwensB. P.JohnsonM. D.MitchellT. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517-1538.
49.
PastorinoE. E.Doyle-PortilloS. M. (2013). What is psychology? Essentials. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
50.
RousseauM. B.KellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. M.BeckT. (2018). Relationship conflict, family name congruence, and socioemotional wealth in family firms. Family Business Review, 31(4), 397-416. doi:10.1177/0894486518790425
51.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 667-687.
52.
ShepherdD. A. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship: Stocks, flows, reactions, and responses. Family Business Review, 29, 151-158.
53.
TeeceD. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
54.
WinterS. G. (2011). Problems at the foundation? Comments on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 257-277.
55.
ZahraS. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23-40.
56.
ZahraS. A. (2018). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms: The wellspring of the regenerative capability. Family Business Review, 31, 216-226.
57.
ZahraS. A.NeweyL. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1059-1075.
58.
ZellwegerT.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2018). Social structures, social relationships and family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1042258718792290