AnglinA. H.ReidS. W.ShortJ. C.ZacharyM. A.RutherfordM. W. (2017). An archival approach to measuring family influence: An organizational identity perspective. Family Business Review, 30, 19-36.
2.
AstrachanJ. H.KleinS. B.SmyrniosK. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58.
3.
BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.PayneG. T.ZacharyM. A. (2014). Researching long-term orientation: A validation study and recommendations for future research. Family Business Review, 27, 72-88.
4.
Cabrera-SuárezK.De Saá-PérezP.García-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-46.
5.
Cabrera-SuárezM. K.García-AlmeidaD. J.De Saá-PérezP. (2018). A dynamic network model of the successor’s knowledge construction from the resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 31, 178-197.
6.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.MinolaM.VismaraS. (2016). Management processes and strategy execution in family firms: From “what” to “how.”Small Business Economics, 47, 719-734.
7.
CraigJ. B.SalvatoC. (2012). The distinctiveness, design, and direction of family business research: Insights from management luminaries. Family Business Review, 25, 109-116.
8.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multi-stakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29, 44-64.
9.
DehlenT.ZellwegerT.KammerlanderN.HalterF. (2014). The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 193-209.
10.
DotyD. H.GlickW. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230-251.
11.
DyerW. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19, 253-273.
12.
DyerW. G. (2018). Are family firms really better? Reexamining “Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance.”Family Business Review, 31, 240-248.
13.
DyerW. G.DyerW. J. (2009). Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22, 216-219.
14.
EisenhardtK.GraebnerM. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
15.
EvertR. E.MartinJ. A.McLeodM.PayneG. T. (2016). Empirics in family business research: Progress, challenges, and the path ahead. Family Business Review, 29, 17-43.
16.
EvertR. E.SearsJ. B.MartinJ. A.PayneG. T. (2018). Family ownership and family involvement as antecedents of strategic action: A longitudinal study of initial international entry. Journal of Business Research, 84, 301-311.
17.
FletcherD.De MassisA.NordqvistM. (2016). Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 8-25.
18.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
19.
HoltD. T.PearsonA. W.PayneG. T.SharmaP. (2018). Family business research as a boundary-spanning platform. Family Business Review, 31, 14-31.
20.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.JenningsP. D. (2017). Is it better to govern managers via agency or stewardship? Examining asymmetries by family versus nonfamily affiliation. Family Business Review, 30, 262-283.
21.
JaskiewiczP.HeinrichsK.RauS. B.ReayT. (2016). To be or not to be: How family firms manage family and commercial logics in succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 781-813.
22.
JaskiewiczP.DyerW. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 111-118.
23.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305-328.
24.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
25.
LitzR. A. (2008). Two sides of a one-sided phenomenon: Conceptualizing the family business and business family as a Möbius Strip. Family Business Review, 21, 217-236.
26.
MadisonK.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P. (2017). Coexisting agency and stewardship governance in family firms: An empirical investigation of individual-level and firm-level effects. Family Business Review, 30, 347-368.
27.
MertonR. K. (1967). On theoretical sociology. New York, NY: Free Press.
28.
MillerD.Breton-MillerL. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73-87.
29.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2018). Looking back at and forward from: “Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship and capabilities.”Family Business Review, 31, 229-237.
30.
MillerD.SteierL.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
31.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.ChrismanJ. J.SpenceL. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 235-255.
32.
MooresK. (2009). Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business families. Family Business Review, 22, 167-180.
33.
NelsonT.ConstantinidisC. (2017). Sex and gender in family business succession research: A review and forward agenda from a social construction perspective. Family Business Review, 30, 219-241.
34.
PayneG. T.PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C. (2017). Process and variance modeling: Linking research questions to methods in family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 11-18.
35.
Perez RodrıguezM. J.BascoR. (2011). The cognitive legitimacy of the family business field. Family Business Review, 24, 322-342.
36.
RauS. B. (2014). Resource-based view of family firms. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business, pp. 321-339. London, England: Sage.
37.
RauS. B.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. X. (2018). The F-PEC revisited: From the family business definition dilemma to foundation of theory. Family Business Review, 31, 200-213.
38.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110.
39.
RevillaA. J.Pérez-LuñoA.NietoM. J. (2016). Does family involvement in management reduce the risk of business failure? The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 29, 365-379.
40.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
41.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.GersickK. E. (2012). 25 years of Family Business Review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25, 5-15.
42.
SharmaP.SalvatoC.ReayT. (2014). Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review, 27, 10-19.
43.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
44.
SoleimanofS.RutherfordM. W.WebbJ. W. (2018). The intersection of family firms and institutional contexts: A review and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 31, 32-53.
45.
SwedbergR. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theoretical Sociology, 41, 1-40.
46.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47.
WeickK. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385-390.
48.
WhettenD. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.
49.
WrightM.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2014). Family enterprise and context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1247-1260.
50.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.SorensonR. L.BrighamK. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 33-57.
51.
ZahraS.A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23-40.
52.
ZahraS. (2018). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms: The wellspring of the regenerative capability. Family Business Review, 31, 216-226.
53.
ZahraS.SharmaP. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
54.
ZahraS. A.WrightM. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67-83.