AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
2.
AntebyM.ChanC. K.DiBenignoJ. (2016). Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 183-244.
3.
BansalP.SongH. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate responsibility from sustainability. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 105-149.
4.
BiesR. J.BarclayL. J.TrippT. M.AquinoK. (2016). A systems perspective on forgiveness in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 245-318.
5.
BriscoeF.GuptaA. (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 671-727.
6.
BrundinE.HärtelC. E. J. (2014). Emotions in family firms. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 529-548). London, England: Sage.
7.
ChenM. J.MillerD. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 135-210.
8.
ChiricoF.NordqvistM.ColomboG.MollonaE. (2012). Simulating dynamic capabilities and value creation in family firms: Is paternalism an “asset” or a “liability”?Family Business Review, 25, 318-338.
9.
ColliA.HoworthC.RoseM. (2013). Long-term perspectives on family business. Business History, 55, 841-854.
10.
CropanzanoR.AnthonyE. L.DanielsS. R.HallA. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 479-516.
11.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.LichtenthalerU. (2012). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26, 10-31.
12.
EggersJ. P.KaplanS. (2013). Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 295-340.
13.
EffronD. A.MillerD. T. (2015). Do as I say, not as I’ve done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 131, 16-32.
14.
EvertR. E.MartinJ. A.McLeodM. S.PayneG. T. (2016). Empirics in family business research: Progress, challenges and the path ahead. Family Business Review, 29, 17-43.
15.
FelinT.FossN. J.PloyhartR. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 575-632.
16.
FeliuN.BoteroI. C. (2016). Philanthropy in family enterprises: A review of literature. Family Business Review, 29, 121-141.
17.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GagnéM.SharmaP.De MassisA. (2014). The study of organizational behavior in family business. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23, 643-656.
19.
GeorgeG. (2014). Rethinking management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 1-6.
20.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 107-120.
21.
GoodrickE.ReayT. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38, 372-416.
22.
GrasD.NasonR. S. (2015). Bric by bric: The role of the family household in sustaining a venture in impoverished Indian slums. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 546-563.
23.
GreenwoodR.DiazA. M.LiS. X.LorenteJ. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521-539.
24.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371.
25.
HambrickD. C. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered?Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11-16.
26.
HollenbeckJ. R. (2008). The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In BaruchY.KonradA. M.AguinusH.StarbuckW. H. (Eds.), Journal editing: Opening the black box (pp. 16-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
HoltD. T.PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.BarnettT. (2017). Family firm(s) outcomes model: Structuring financial and nonfinancial outcomes across the family and firm. Family Business Review, 30, 182-202.
28.
HutchesonJ. O.JaffeD.GillilandK. (2013). Addiction in the family enterprise. Family Business Review, 26, 104-107.
29.
JacksonS. E.SchulerR. S.JiangK. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 1-56.
30.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkruzR. (2012). Worlds apart? Re-bridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87-108.
31.
JangD.ElfenbeinH.BottomW. (2018). More than a phase: Form and features of general theory of negotiation. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 318-356.
32.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ.ShanineK.KacmarM. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 309-341.
33.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
34.
JiangD. S.KellermannsF. W.MunyonT. P.MorrisM. L. (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31, 125-157.
35.
JimenezR. M. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22, 53-64.
36.
KayeK. (1996). When the family business is a sickness. Family Business Review, 9, 347-368.
37.
KelmanS. (2007). Public administration and organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 225-267.
38.
KhatriN.TsangE. W.BegleyT. M. (2006). Cronyism: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 61-75.
39.
KieserA.NicolaiA.SeidlD. (2015). The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 143-233.
40.
KossekE.LautschB. (2018). Work-life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work-life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 5-36.
41.
MadisonK.HoltD. T.KellermannsF. W.RanftA. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65-93.
42.
MarquisC.RaynardM. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 291-335.
43.
MartinG.CurrieG.WeaverS.FinnR.McDonaldR. (2017). Institutional complexity and individual responses: delineating the boundaries of partial autonomy. Organization Studies, 38, 103-127.
44.
McKeeD.MaddenT. M.KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2014). Conflicts in family firms: The good and the bad. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 514-528). London, England: Sage.
45.
MengesJ. I.KilduffM. (2015). Group emotions: Cutting the Gordian knots concerning terms, levels of analysis, and processes. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 845-928.
46.
MillerD.Le-Breton MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
MossT. W.ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.LumpkinG. T. (2010). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 805-830.
48.
PayneG. T.PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C. (2016). Process and variance modeling: Linking research questions to methods in family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 11-18.
49.
PukallT. J.CalabròA. (2014). The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27, 103-125.
50.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65-171.
51.
RauS. B. (2014). Resource based view of the firm. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 321-339). London, England: Sage.
52.
RichardP. J.DevinneyT. M.YipG. S.JohnsonG. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards a methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718-804.
53.
RobersonQ.HolmesO.PerryJ. (2017). Transforming research on diversity and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 189-216.
54.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ.DeckerS. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 39, 250-274.
55.
RuppD. E.ShapiroD. L.FolgerR.SkarlickiD. P.ShaoR. (2017). A critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of organizational justice: Is it time for reassessment?Academy of Management Annals, 11, 919-959.
56.
RynesS. L.BartunekJ. M.DaftR. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
57.
SalvatoC.MinichillA.PiccarretaR. (2012). Faster route to the CEO Suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency?Family Business Review, 25, 206-224.
58.
SalvatoC.SharmaP.WrightM. (2015). Learning patterns and approaches to family business education around the world: Issues, insights and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 307-320.
59.
SharmaP. (2010). Advancing the 3Rs of family business scholarship: Rigor, relevance, reach. In StewartA.LumpkinG. T.KatzJ. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 12, pp. 383-400). Bingley, England: Emerald.
60.
SharmaP.SalvatoC.ReayT. (2014). Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review, 27, 10-19.
61.
ShepherdD. A. (2016). An emotions perspective for advancing the fields of family business and entrepreneurship: Stocks, flows, reactions, and responses. Family Business Review, 29, 151-158.
62.
ShortJ. C.SharmaP.LumpkinG. T.PearsonA. W. (2016). Oh, the places we’ll go! Reviewing past, present, and future possibilities in family business research. Family Business Review, 29, 11-16.
63.
ShuklaP. P.CarneyM.GedajlovicE. (2014). Economic theories of family firms. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 100-118). London, England: Sage.
64.
SimonH. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York, NY: Macmillan.
65.
SoleimanofS.RutherfordM. W.WebbJ. W. (2018). The intersection of family firms and institutional contexts: A review and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 31, 32-53.
66.
StrikeV. M.MichelA.KammerlanderN. (2018). Unpacking the black box of family business advising: Insights from psychology. Family Business Review, 31, 80-124.
67.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2018). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31, 54-79.
68.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-843.
69.
TraceyP. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 87-134.
70.
TsaoC.ChenS.LinC.HydeW. (2009). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: The role of high-performance work systems. Family Business Review, 22, 319-332.
71.
VaaraE.LambergJ. A. (2016). Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41, 633-657.
72.
Van GilsA.DibrellC.NeubaumD. O.CraigJ. B. (2014). Social issues in the family enterprise. Family Business Review, 27, 193-205.
73.
VermeulenF. (2007). I shall not remain insignificant: Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 754-761.
74.
VillalongaB.AmitR.TrujilloM.GuzmanA. (2015). Governance of family firms. American Review of Financial Economics, 7, 635-654.
75.
Von SchlippeA.SchneewindK. A. (2014). Theories from family psychology and family therapy. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 47-65). London: England: Sage.
76.
WebbJ. W.PryorC. G.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Household enterprise in base-of-the-pyramid markets: The influence of institutions and family embeddedness. Africa Journal of Management, 1, 115-136.
77.
WhettenD.ForemanP.DyerW. G. (2014). Organizational identity and family business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 480-497). London: England: Sage.
78.
WortmanM. S.Jr. (1994). Theoretical foundations for family-owned businesses: A conceptual and research based paradigm. Family Business Review, 7, 3-27.
79.
ZahraS. A.SharmaP. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
80.
ZhaoE. Y.WryT. (2016). Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1994-2020.