Small family firms have many unique relational qualities with implications for how knowledge is passed between individuals. Extant literature posits leadership approach as important in explaining differences in knowledge-sharing climate from one firm to another. This study investigates how leadership approaches interact with family influence to inform perceptions of knowledge sharing. We utilize survey data (n = 110) from owner-managers of knowledge-intensive small family firms in Scotland. Our findings present a choice in leadership intention, contrasting organization-focused participation against family-influenced guidance. Insight is offered on the implications of this leadership choice at both organizational and familial levels.
AlvessonM. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
3.
ArmstrongJ. S.OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
4.
ArregleJ.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.
5.
AstrachanC. B.PatelV. K.WanzenriedG. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 116-128.
6.
AstrachanJ. H.KleinS. B.SmyrniosK. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58.
7.
AtwaterL.CarmeliA. (2009). Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy and involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 264-275.
8.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
9.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
10.
BarronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
11.
BaruchY.HoltomB. C. (2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.
12.
BascoR. (2013). The family’s effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4, 42-66.
13.
BaumgartnerH.HomburgC. (1996). Applications of structural equation modelling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139-161.
14.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
15.
BinzC.HairJ. F.PieperT. M.BaldaufA. (2013). Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4, 3-11.
16.
BontisN.Fitz-EnzJ. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 223-247.
17.
BoydB.RoyerS. (2012). The suitability of internal versus external successors: Relevant knowledge types in family business succession. International Journal of Management Practice, 5, 361-382.
18.
CabreraE. F.CabreraA. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 720-735.
19.
Cabrera-SuárezK.De Saá-PérezP.García-AlmeidaD. (2001).The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-46.
CarmeliA.GelbardR.Reiter-PalmonR. (2013). Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52, 95-121.
22.
CarmeliA.Reiter-PalmonR.ZivE. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 250-260.
23.
CasperszD.ThomasJ. (2015). Developing positivity in family business leaders. Family Business Review, 28, 60-75.
24.
CattellR. B. (1988). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In: NesselroadeJ. R.CattellR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 131-203). New York, NY: Springer.
25.
ChiricoF. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26, 433-462.
26.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21, 169-181.
27.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
28.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
29.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.BergielE. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 355-372.
30.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113.
31.
CollinsC. J.SmithK. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544-560.
32.
ConnellyC. E.KellowayE. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, 294-301.
33.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC.GarrettR. (2014). Examining relationships among family influence, family culture, and flexible planning systems. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 229-238.
34.
CruzC.NordqvistM. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33-49.
35.
CurranJ.BlackburnR. A. (2001). Researching the small enterprise. London, England: Sage.
DebickiB. J.MatherneC. F.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium an overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22, 151-166.
38.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 337-360.
39.
DixonM. L.HartL. K. (2010). The impact of path-goal leadership styles on work group effectiveness and turnover intention. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(1), 52-69.
40.
DotsikaF.PatrickK. (2013). Collaborative KM for SMEs: A framework evaluation study. Information Technology & People, 26, 368-382.
41.
DrathW. H.McCauleyC. D.PalusC. J.Van VelsorE.O’ConnorP. M.McGuireJ. B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635-653.
42.
EddlestonK. A. (2008). Commentary: The prequel to family firms culture and stewardship: The leadership perspective of the founder. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1055-1061.
43.
European Commission. (2003). Commission recommendations of 6th May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Official Journal of the European Union, L(124), 36-41.
44.
FletcherD.De MassisA.NordqvistM. (2016). Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 8-25. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001
45.
FordD. P.StaplesD. S. (2006). Perceived value of knowledge: The potential informer’s perception. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 3-16.
46.
FornellC.LarkerD. (1981). Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
47.
GagnéM. (2009). A model of knowledge sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48, 571-589.
48.
GagnéM.SharmaP.De MassisA. (2014). The study of organizational behaviour in family business. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23, 643-656.
49.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
50.
GibsonC. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
51.
GiovannoniE.MaraghiniM. P.RiccaboniA. (2011). Transmitting knowledge across generation: The role of management accounting practices. Family Business Review, 24, 126-150.
52.
GourlayS. (2006). Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of Nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1415-1436.
53.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
54.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
55.
HabbershonT. G. (2006). Commentary: A framework for managing the familiness and agency advantages in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 879-886.
56.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
HannahS. T.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.HarmsP. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 669-692.
59.
HansenM. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13, 232-248.
60.
HarrisL. C.OgbonnaE. (2001). Leadership style and market orientation: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 744-764.
61.
HatakI. R.RoesslD. (2015). Relational competence-based knowledge transfer within intrafamily succession: An experimental study. Family Business Review, 28, 10-25.
62.
HieblM. R.NeubauerH.DullerC.Feldbauer-DurstmüllerB. (2014). The relationship between corporate governance configuration in family businesses and the use of management accounting. International Journal of Business Research, 14(2), 53-74.
63.
HoeS. L.McShaneS. (2010). Structural and informal knowledge acquisition and dissemination in organizational learning. Learning Organization, 17, 643-386.
64.
HolsteJ. S.FieldsD. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 128-140.
65.
HoltD. T.RutherfordM. W.KuratkoD. F. (2010). Advancing the fields of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23, 76-88.
66.
HouseR. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
67.
HouseR. J.DesslerG. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In HuntJ. G.LarsonL. L. (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 29-55). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
68.
HouseR. J.MitchellT. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-97.
69.
HuangS. K.WangY. L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and innovation in small and medium enterprises. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 563-570.
70.
HuangX.IunJ.LiuA.GongY. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 122-143.
71.
IpeM. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 337-359.
72.
JadallahN. A. H.Al-JaradatO. M.NagrashM. A. (2012). The impact of collaborative knowledge and organizational memory on the quality of the managerial decisions in the libraries of Jordanian public universities. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(15), 177-191.
73.
JaskiewiczP.UhlenbruckK.BalkinD. B.ReayT. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26, 121-139.
74.
JooB. K. B. (2010). Organizational commitment for knowledge workers: The roles of perceived organizational learning culture, leader-member exchange quality, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 69-85.
75.
KaiserH. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytical rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
76.
KarraN.TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-877.
77.
KasemsapK. (2013). Strategic human resource practice: A functional framework and causal model of leadership behavior, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job performance. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4, 198-204.
78.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.SarathyR.MurphyF. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38, 85-101.
79.
KleinS.AstrachanJ.SmyrniosK. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-340.
80.
KondraA.HurstC. (2009). Institutional processes of organizational culture. Culture and Organization, 15(1), 39-58.
81.
KoroppC.KellermannsF. W.GrichnikD.StanleyL. (2014). Financial decision making in family firms: An adaptation of the theory of planned behavior. Family Business Review, 27, 307-327.
82.
LeeJ. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19, 103-114.
83.
LeeP.GillespieN.MannL.WearningA. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41, 473-491.
84.
LepoutreJ.HeeneA. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 257-273.
85.
LiG.LiuH.ShangY.XiY. (2014). Leader feedback and knowledge sharing: A regulatory focus theory perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 20, 749-763.
LindsleyD. H.BrassD. J.ThomasJ. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
88.
MallénF.ChivaR.AlegreJ.GuinotJ. (2015). Are altruistic leaders worthy? The role of organizational learning capability. International Journal of Manpower, 36, 271-295.
Molina-AzorínJ. F.López-GameroM. D.Pereira-MolinerJ.Pertusa-OrtegaE. M. (2012). Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24, 425-456.
91.
MooradianT.RenzlB.MatzlerK. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37, 523-540.
92.
MumfordM. D.ByrneC. L.ShipmanA. S. (2009). The thinking of creative leaders: Outward focus, inward focus, and integration. In TudorR.RuncoM. A.MogerS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 279-291). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
93.
MussolinoD.CalabròA. (2014). Paternalistic leadership in family firms: Types and implications for intergenerational succession?Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 197-210.
94.
NeubaumD. O.DibrellC.CraigJ. B. (2012). Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3, 28-37.
95.
NiemeläT. (2004). Interfirm cooperation capability in the context of networking family firms: The role of power. Family Business Review, 17, 319-330.
96.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
97.
NorthouseP. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory & practice (7th ed.). London, England: Sage.
98.
NoyC. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327-344.
99.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.
100.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
101.
PozaE. J.HanlonS.KishidaR. (2004). Does the family business interaction factor represent a resource or a cost?Family Business Review, 17, 99-118.
102.
Reiter-PalmonR.IlliesJ. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55-77.
103.
RijalS. (2010). Leadership style and organizational culture in learning organization: A comparative study. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 14(5), 119-127.
104.
RosenB.FurstS.BlackburnR. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 36, 259-273.
105.
RutherfordM. W.KuratkoD. F.HoltD. T. (2008). Examining the link between “familiness” and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1089-1109.
106.
SalvatoC.CorbettaG. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26, 235-255.
107.
SarinS.McDermottC. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34, 707-739.
108.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-490.
109.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P.WhyteG. (2000). Effect of self-and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation. Human Performance, 13, 279-298.
110.
SharmaP.De MassisA.GagneM. (2014). Family business: A fertile ground for research on time, teams and positive organizational study. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23, 674-679.
111.
SiegerP.BernhardF.FreyU. (2011). Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: Investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 78-89.
112.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
113.
SirmonD. G.ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.WebbJ. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 979-998.
114.
SonfieldM.LussierR. (2009). Family-member and non-family-member managers in family businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15, 196-209.
115.
SorensonR. L. (2000). The contribution of leadership style and practices to family and business success. Family Business Review, 13, 183-200.
116.
SrivastavaA.BartolK. M.LockeE. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1239-1251.
117.
StanleyL. J.McDowellW. (2014). The role of interorganizational trust and organizational efficacy in family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 264-275.
118.
TaggarS.SeijtsG. H. (2003). Leader and staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective-efficacy and team performance. Human Performance, 16, 131-156.
119.
TaorminaR. J. (2008). Interrelating leadership behaviours, organizational socialization, and organizational culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 85-102.
120.
ThorpeR.HoltR.MacphersonA.PittawayL. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 257-281.
121.
UhlanerL. M.MatserI. A.Berent-BraunM. M.FlörenR. H. (2015). Linking bonding and bridging ownership social capital in private firms: Moderating effects of ownership-management overlap and family firm identity. Family Business Review, 28, 260-277.
122.
VallejoM. C. (2009). Analytical model of leadership in family firms under transformational theoretical approach: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 22, 136-150.
123.
VecchioR. P.JustinJ. E.PearceC. L. (2008). The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 71-82.
124.
VenterE.BoshoffC.MaasG. (2005). The influence of successor-related factors on the succession process in small and medium-sized family businesses. Family Business Review, 18, 283-303.
125.
VeronaG. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 132-142.
126.
von KroghG.NonakaI.RechsteinerL. (2012). Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: A review and framework. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 240-277.
127.
WangC. L.HultT. M.KetchenD. J.AhmedP. K. (2009). Knowledge management orientation, market orientation, and firm performance: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 17, 99-122.
128.
WangS.NoeR. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115-131.
129.
WarringtonS. M.VenterE.BoshoffC. (2012). The role of selected team design elements in successful sibling teams. Family Business Review, 25, 191-205.
130.
WestheadP.CowlingM. (1999). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23. Retrieved from https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-55330102.html
131.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2007). “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
132.
WilsonS. R.WhitmoyerJ. G.PieperT. M.AstrachanJ. H.HairJ. F.SarstedtM. (2014). Method trends and method needs: Examining methods needed for accelerating the field. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 4-14.
133.
XiJ.KrausS.FilserM.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Mapping the field of family business research: Past trends and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 113-132.
134.
XueY.BradleyJ.LiangH. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 299-312.
135.
YahyaS.GohW.-K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 457-468.
136.
YanJ.SorensonR. L. (2003). Collective entrepreneurship in family firms: The influence of leader attitudes and behaviors. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 37-60.
137.
YoungM. L. (2014). The formation of concern for face and its impact on knowledge sharing intention in knowledge management systems. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(1), 36-47.
138.
YuklG. (2011). Contingency theories of effective leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 286-298). London, England: Sage.
139.
ZahraS. A.FilatotchevI. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 885-897.
140.
ZahraS. A.NeubaumD. O.LarrañetaB. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1070-1079.
141.
ZhangP.NgF. F. (2013). Explaining knowledge-sharing intention in construction teams in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, 280-293.
