In a qualitative study of 19 family businesses, we examine the dynamics of successor teams, using insights from the family dynamics and succession literature and teams and conflict theory in family business. In-depth interviews with family firm leaders identified two major successor team performance outcomes, a positive track leading to team commitment and a negative track resulting in dissolution of the team and potentially the family firm. Our findings are encapsulated by 10 propositions and a model of successor team dynamics.
AronoffC. E. (1998). Megatrends in family business. Family Business Review, 11, 181-186.
2.
AstrachanJ. H.AllenI. E.SpinelliS. (2002). MassMutual/Raymond Institute American family business survey. Springfield, MA: MassMutual Financial Group.
3.
BarachJ. A.GantiskyJ. B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8, 131-155.
4.
BarachJ. A.GantiskyJ. B.CarsonJ. A.DoochinB. A. (1988). Entry of the next generation: Strategic challenge for family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 49-57.
5.
BennedsenM.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2010). The governance of family firms. In BakerH. K.AndersonR. (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research and practice (pp. 371-389). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
6.
BirleyS. (2002). Attitudes of owner-managers’ children towards family and business issues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 5-19.
7.
BrundePontetS.WroschC.GagneM. (2007). An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family businesses approaching succession. Family Business Review, 20, 337-354.
8.
Cabrera-SuarezK.De Saa-PerezP.Garcia-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-47.
9.
CadieuxL.LorrainJ.HugronP. (2002). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17-30.
10.
CaterJ. J.JustisR. T. (2010). The development and implementation of shared leadership in multi-generational family firms. Management Research Review, 33, 563-585.
11.
CaterJ. J.KidwellR. E. (2014). Function, governance, and trust in successor leadership groups in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 217-228.
12.
ChenailR. (2009). Communicating your qualitative research better. Family Business Review, 22, 105-108.
13.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11, 19-34.
14.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19-39.
15.
ChurchillN. C.HattenK. J. (1987). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 11, 51-64.
16.
Cisneros-MartinezL. F.DeschampsB. (2012, May). Small family business succession and entrepreneurial teams of siblings: What is new for the succession process?Paper presented at the Family Enterprise Research Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
17.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CorderyJ. L.MuellerW. S.SmithL. M. (1991). Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 464-476.
19.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (2001). The phenomenon of substantive conflict in the family firm: A cross-generational study. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 14-30.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
DyerW. G.Jr.DyerJ. H.DyerW. G. (2013). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
EbertR.MitchellT. (1975). Organizational decision processes, concepts and analysis. New York, NY: Crane, Russak.
25.
EddlestonK. A.KidwellR. E. (2012). Parent–child relationships: Planting the seeds of deviant behavior in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 369-386.
26.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
27.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
28.
FarringtonS. M.VenterE.BoshoffC. (2012). The role of selected team design elements in successful sibling teams. Family Business Review, 25, 191-205.
29.
GildingM.GregoryS.CossonB. (2015). Motives and outcomes in family business succession planning, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 299-312.
30.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative design. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
31.
GlassopL. I. (2002). The organizational benefits of teams. Human Relations, 55, 225-249.
32.
HackmanJ. R.KatzN. (2010). Group behavior and performance. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1208-1251). New York, NY: Wiley.
33.
HackmanJ. R.PearceJ. L.WolfeJ. C. (1978). Effects of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behaviors: A naturally-occurring quasi-experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 289-304.
34.
HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844-863.
35.
HambrickD. C. (1981). Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 253-275.
36.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
37.
HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 37-51.
38.
HandlerW. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7, 133-157.
39.
HarrisonE. (1975). The managerial decision making process. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
HarryB.SturgesK. M.KlingnerJ. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenges in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34, 3-13.
41.
HoworthC.AliZ. A. (2001). Family business succession in Portugal: An examination of case studies in the furniture industry. Family Business Review, 14, 231-244.
42.
JacksonS. E.MayK. E.WhitneyK. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams. In GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,
43.
KanterR. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 499-517.
44.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 209-228.
45.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2007). A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1048-1057.
46.
LambrechtJ. (2005). Multigenerational transition in family businesses: A new explanatory model. Family Business Review, 28, 267-282.
47.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.LesterR. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22, 704-721.
48.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London, England: Sage.
49.
LongR. G.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Management succession in family business. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 249-268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
LongeneckerJ. G.SchoenJ. E. (1978). Management succession in the family business. In AronoffC. E.AstrachanJ. H.WardJ. L. (Eds.), Family business sourcebook II (pp. 87-92). Marietta, GA: Business Owner Resources.
51.
LubatkinM. H.DurandR.LingY. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1022-1029.
52.
MassMutual, Kennesaw State, & Family Firm Institute. (2007). American family business survey. Atlanta, GA: MassMutual.
53.
MehrotraV.MorckR.ShimJ.WiwattanakantangY. (2011). Must love kill the family firm? Some exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1121-1148.
54.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
55.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-98.
56.
MillikenF. L.MartinsL. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-423.
57.
MitchellJ. R.HartT. A.ValceaS.TownsendD. M. (2009). Becoming the boss: Discretion and postsuccession success in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1201-1218.
58.
MorrisH. M.WilliamsR. O.AllenJ. A.AvilaR. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385-401.
59.
OrsburnJ. D.MoranL. (2000). The new self-directed work teams: Mastering the challenge. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
60.
PattonE.ApplebaumS. H. (2003). The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 26, 60-72.
61.
PearsonA. W.BergielE.BarnettT. (2014). Expanding the study of organizational behaviour in family business: Adapting team theory to explore family firms. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23, 657-664.
62.
PearsonA. W.MarlerL. E. (2010). A leadership perspective of reciprocal stewardship in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1117-1124.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
65.
PozaE. J. (2010). Family business (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
66.
ReayT. (2014). Publishing qualitative research. Family Business Review, 27, 95-102.
67.
RubensonG. C.GuptaA. K. (1996). The initial succession: A contingency model of founder tenure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20, 21-35.
68.
SchjoedtL.MonsenE.PearsonA.BarnettT.ChrismanJ. J. (2013). New venture and family business teams: Understanding team formation, composition, behaviors, and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1-15.
69.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-490.
70.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
71.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1-15.
72.
SharmaP.IrvingG. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 13-33.
73.
SharmaP.RaoS. A. (2000). Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firms: A comparison study. Family Business Review, 13, 313-330.
74.
ShepherdD. A.ZacharakisA. (2000). Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader’s decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 25-39.
75.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20-24.
76.
SorensonR. L. (1999). Conflict management strategies used in successful family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 133-146.
77.
StavrouE. T.SwierczP. M. (1998). Securing the future of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 19-39.
78.
SteierL. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597-618.
79.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
80.
SundstromE.de MeuseK. P.FutrellD. (1990). Work teams. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
81.
TuckmanB. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
82.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
83.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
