A growing body of research is concerned with how family governance influences innovation. Yet the organizational issues that family governance engenders for innovation processes have been largely overlooked. In a study of six small- and medium-size family enterprises, we investigate the design decisions that fit family and business logics to create high-performing new product development programs. Our results reveal three design principles concerning teams, leadership, and incentives that diverge from customary approaches of organizing for new product development, adding important dimensions to the determinants of successful new product development in small- and medium-size family enterprises.
AgarwalR.HelfatC. E. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science, 20, 281-293.
2.
AliA.ChenT. Y.RadhakrishnanS. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 44, 238-286.
3.
AmabileT. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
4.
AmabileT. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
5.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
6.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1327.
7.
BarczakG.WilemonD. (1992). Successful new product team leaders. Industrial Marketing Management, 21, 61-68.
8.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
9.
BhuiyanN.GerwinD.ThomsonV. (2004). Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement. Management Science, 50, 1690-1703.
10.
BlockJ.MillerD.JaskiewiczP.SpiegelF. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26, 180-199.
11.
BlockJ. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248-265.
12.
BranzeiO.VertinskyI. (2006). Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 75-105.
13.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343-378.
14.
BurkartM.PanunziF.ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167-2202.
15.
CardinalL. B.TurnerS. F.FernM. J.BurtonR. M. (2011). Organizing for product development across technological environments: Performance trade-offs and priorities. Organization Science, 22, 1000-1025.
16.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.
17.
CarneyM.GedajlovicE. (2003, August). Governance, inducements-contributions and organizational capabilities. Paper Presented at the 2003 Academy of Management Meetings, Seattle, WA.
18.
CassiaL.De MassisA.PizzurnoE. (2011). An exploratory investigation on NPD in small family businesses from Northern Italy. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2, 1-14.
19.
ChinC. L.ChenY. J.KleinmanG.LeeP. (2009). Corporate ownership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24, 145-175.
20.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2014). Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/etap.12114
21.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.FrattiniF.WrightM. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 310-318.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
23.
ChrismanJ. J.MemiliE.MisraK. (2014). Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner’s curse: The influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1103-1127.
24.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976-997.
25.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.BergielE. B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 355-372.
26.
ClarkK. B.FujimotoT. (1991). Product development performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
27.
ClarkK. B.WheelwrightS. C. (1992). Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. California Management Review, 34, 9-28.
28.
ClassenN.Van GilsA.BammensY.CarreeM. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 191-215.
29.
ConnellyB. L.HoskissonR. E.TihanyiL.CertoS. T. (2010). Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1561-1589.
30.
CooperR. G.EdgettS. J.KleinschmidtE. J. (2004a). Benchmarking best NPD practices—I. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 31-43.
31.
CooperR. G.EdgettS. J.KleinschmidtE. J. (2004b). Benchmarking best NPD practices—II. Research-Technology Management, 47(3), 50-59.
32.
CooperR. G.KleinschmidtE. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184.
33.
CooperR. G.KleinschmidtE. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 374-391.
34.
CovinJ. G.SlevinD. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 7-24.
35.
CruzC. C.Gómez-MejíaL. R.BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 69-89.
36.
CzarnitzkiD.KraftK. (2009). Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 372-383.
37.
DailyC. M.DollingerM. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5, 117-136.
38.
De MassisA.Di MininA.FrattiniF. (2015). Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58, 5-19.
39.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.LichtenthalerU. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26, 10-31.
40.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.PizzurnoE.CassiaL. (2015). Product innovation in family vs. non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 51, 1-36.
41.
De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2014). Case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 15-29.
42.
DemsetzH.LehnK. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177.
43.
DoughertyD.HardyC. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1120-1153.
44.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2015). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0424
45.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
46.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
47.
ErnstH. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4, 1-40.
48.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
49.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145-1172.
50.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1010-1037.
51.
GedajlovicE.LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 899-912.
52.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1351-1374.
53.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
54.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81-95.
55.
GriffinA. (1997). The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 24-35.
56.
HerreroI. (2011). Agency costs, family ties, and firm efficiency. Journal of Management, 37, 887-904.
57.
HowellJ. M.HigginsC. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341.
58.
JaskiewiczP.UhlenbruckK.BalkinD. B.ReayT. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26, 121-139.
59.
KammerlanderN.GanterM. (2015). An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ non-economic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 361-383.
60.
KellerR. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
61.
KönigA.KammerlanderN.EndersA. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38, 418-441.
62.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
63.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FangH. C.FrattiniF. (2014). Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43, 597-619.
64.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.BianchiM.FangH. (2013). Technology acquisition in family and non-family firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 1073-1088.
65.
KotlarJ.FangH.De MassisA.FrattiniF. (2014). Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and non-family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 1128-1145.
66.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
67.
LedwithA.O’DwyerM. (2009). Market orientation, NPD performance, and organizational performance in small firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 652-661.
68.
LewisM. W.WelshM. A.DehlerG. E.GreenS. G. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 546-564.
69.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1999). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 367-382.
71.
NietoM. J.SantamariaL.FernandezZ. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 382-399.
72.
NumagamiT. (1998). The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science, 9, 2-15.
73.
O’DwyerM.LedwithA. (2009). Determinants of new product performance in small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15, 124-136.
74.
PageA. L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 273-290.
75.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 617-627.
76.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
PazzagliaF.MengoliS.SapienzaE. (2013). Earnings quality in acquired and nonacquired family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Family Business Review, 26, 374-386.
78.
RosenbuschN.BrinckmannJ.BauschA. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441-457.
79.
SarinS.McDermottC. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34, 707-739.
80.
SchillingM. A.HillC. W. (1998). Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 67-81.
81.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
82.
SciasciaS.NordqvistM.MazzolaP.De MassisA. (2015). Family ownership and R&D intensity in small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 349-360.
83.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS.MacMillanI. (1995). Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies. Journal of Management, 21, 931-952.
84.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
85.
SomechA. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132-157.
86.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
87.
TatikondaM. V.Montoya-WeissM. M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47, 151-172.
88.
ThamhainH. J. (1990). Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7, 5-18.
89.
Van der VegtG. S.JanssenO. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751.
90.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1183-1205.
91.
YinR. (2003). Applications of case study research. London, England: Sage.
92.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23, 851-868.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
