This article introduces the idea of a nonkinship-based Universal-family firm, an organizational form we developed based on interpreting historical writings in their socioeconomic context. We analyzed Luke’s gospel with an eye toward drawing implications for the stewardship agency debate in the contemporary family business literature. Our article makes contributions at two important levels. In addition to introducing and developing theory about the Universal-family firms, we also contribute to the methodological toolkit of family business scholars by providing a template for using historical documents to challenge, enhance, and develop theory.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
2.
AndréR. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility?Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 133-150.
Aristotle. (2006). Nicomachean ethics (RossW. D. Trans.). eBooks@Adelaide.
5.
AronoffC. E.WardJ. L. (1995). Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model for the future?Family Business Review, 8, 121-130.
6.
BaergenR. A. (2006). Servant, manager or slave? Reading the parable of the rich man and his steward (Luke 16:1-8a) through the lens of ancient slavery. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 35, 25-38.
7.
BarneyJ. B.HesterlyW. (1999). Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 111-148). London, England: Sage.
8.
BattilianaJ.LeeM.WalkerJ.DorseyC. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50-55.
9.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.
10.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73-96.
11.
BlodgettM.DumasC.ZanziA. (2011). Emerging trends in global ethics: A comparative study of U.S. and international family business values. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 29-38.
12.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13.
BowenM. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
14.
BraithwaiteD. O.BachB. W.BaxterL. A.DiVernieroR.HammondsJ. R.HosekA. M.. . . WolfB. M. (2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 388-407.
15.
CarnevaleC.MazzucaM. (2014). Sustainability reporting and varieties of capitalism. Sustainable Development, 22, 361-376.
16.
ColliA. (2012). Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history. Family Business Review, 25, 243-257.
17.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.”Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28, 355-362.
18.
CountrymanL. W. (1980). The rich Christian in the church of the early empire: Contradictions and accommodations. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.
19.
DavisG. F. (2013). After the corporation. Politics & Society, 41, 283-308.
20.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanR.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
21.
DemsetzH. (1983). Structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 375-390.
22.
DestroA.PesceM. (2003). Father and householder in the Jesus movement: The perspective of the Gospel of Luke. Biblical Interpretation, 11, 211-238.
23.
DierksmeierC.PirsonM. (2009). Oikonomia versus chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 417-439.
24.
DoddS. D.GotsisG. (2009). “Enterprise values” in the New Testament and antecedent works. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10, 101-110.
25.
DonaldsonL. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 369-381.
26.
DyckB. (2013). Management and the Gospel: Luke’s radical message for the first and twenty-first centuries. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
27.
DyckB. (2014). God on management: The world’s five largest religions, the “theological turn,” and organizational and management theory and practice. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 41, 23-62.
28.
DyckB.NeubertM. (2010). Management: Current practices and new directions. Boston, MA: Cengage/Houghton Mifflin.
29.
DyckB.StarkeF. A.DueckC. (2006, Fall). Just what was Jesus saying? Two interpretations of the parable of the shrewd manager. Journal of Biblical Integration in Business, 111-140.
30.
DyckB.StarkeF. A.DueckC. (2009). Management, prophets and self-fulfilling prophecies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 184-196.
31.
EddlestonK.KellermannsF. W.SarathyR. (2012). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 26-50.
32.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theory from case research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
33.
ElliottJ. H. (1991). Temple versus household in Luke-Acts: A contrast in social institutions. In NeyreyJ. H. (Ed.), The social world of Luke-Acts: Models for interpretation (pp. 211-240). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
34.
EslerP. F. (2000). The Mediterranean context of early Christianity. In EslerP. F. (Ed.), The early Christian world (Vol. 1-2, pp. 3-25). London, England: Routledge.
35.
GaffneyR. J. (2012). Hype and hostility for hybrid companies: A fourth sector case study. Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law, 5, 329-345.
36.
GalbraithJ. K. (1987). A history of economics: The past as the present. London, England: Penguin.
37.
GallagherJ.BuckeyeJ. (2014). Structures of grace: The business practices of the Economy of Communion. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press.
GoldL. (2010). New financial horizons: The emergence of an economy of communion. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press.
40.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesT. K.Nuñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
41.
GoodrichJ. K. (2010). Paul, the oikonomos of God: Paul’s apostolic metaphor in 1 Corinthians and its Graeco-Roman context (Doctoral thesis, Durham University). Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/299/
42.
GordonB. (1989). The problem of scarcity and the Christian Greek Fathers: John Chrysostom and some contemporaries. Studia Patristica, 21, 102-120.
43.
GotsisG.DoddS. D. (2004). The economic thought of St. James and the Jerusalem Love Community. History of Economic Ideas, 12(1), 1-35.
44.
GuptaV.LevenburgN. (2010). A thematic analysis of cultural variations in family businesses: The CASE project. Family Business Review, 23, 155-169.
45.
HansonJ. W. (1875). The Greek word aion-aionios translated everlasting-eternal in the Holy Bible, shown to denote limited duration. Chicago, IL: Northwestern Universalist.
46.
HansonK. C.OakmanD. E. (1998). Palestine in the time of Jesus: Social structures and social conflicts. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
47.
HaughH.McKeeL. (2003). “It’s just like a family”—Shared values in the family firm. Community, Work & Family, 6, 141-158.
48.
HauswaldH.HackA. (2013). Impact of family control/influence on stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence. Family Business Review, 26, 356-373.
49.
HopflH. M. (2000). Ordered passions: Commitment and hierarchy in the organizational ideas of the Jesuit founders. Management Learning, 31, 313-329.
50.
JamesH. (2006). Family capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap–Harvard University Press.
51.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25(1), 87-108.
52.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
53.
KarayiannisA. (1992). Entrepreneurship in classical Greek literature. South African Journal of Economics, 60(1), 67-93.
54.
KarayiannisA.DoddS. D. (1998). The Greek Christian Fathers. In LowryS. T.GordonB. (Eds.), Ancient and medieval economic ideas and concepts of social justice (pp. 163-208). Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
KloppenborgJ. S. (2006). Associations in the ancient world. In LevineA. J.AllisonD. C.CrossanJ. D. (Eds.), The historical Jesus in context (pp. 232-338). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1169-1191.
58.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.LesterR. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22, 704-721.
59.
LongeneckerR. N. (2000). Luke’s parables of the Kingdom. In LongeneckerR. N. (Ed.), The challenge of Jesus’ parables (pp. 125-147). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
60.
LubatkinM. H.DurandR.LingY. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1022-1029.
61.
LungeanuR.WardJ. L. (2012). A governance-based typology of family foundations: The effect of generation stage and governance structure on family philanthropic activities. Family Business Review, 25, 409-424.
62.
MadisonK.HoltD.KellermannsK.RanftA. (2015). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486515594292
63.
MalinaB. J. (2001). The social Gospel of Jesus. The kingdom of God in Mediterranean perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
64.
MalinaB. J.NeyreyJ. H. (1991). First century personality: Dyadic, not individual. In NeyreyJ. H. (Ed.), The social world of Luke-Acts: Models for interpretation (pp. 25-65). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
65.
MalinaB. J.RohrbaughR. (2003). Social-science commentary on the synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
66.
MarciannaT.SussmanM. B. (1991) Wider families: An overview. Marriage and Family Review, 17(1/2), 1-8.
67.
MargolisJ.WalshJ. P. (2003). Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
68.
MarshallI. H. (1978). The Gospel of Luke (The New International Greek Testament commentary). Exeter, England: Paternoster Press.
69.
MetzgerB. M.MurphyR. E. (Eds.). (1991). The new Oxford annotated Bible with the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical books (New Rev. Standard Version). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70.
MillerD.Breton-MillerL.MinichilliA.CorbettaG.PittinoD. (2014). When do non-family CEOs outperform in family firms? Agency and behavioural agency perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 547-572.
71.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.ChrismanJ. J.SpenceL. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 235-255.
72.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 367-382.
73.
MorckR. K.PercyM.TianG. Y.YeungB. (2005). The rise and fall of the widely held firm: A history of corporate ownership in Canada. In MorckR. (Ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional managers (pp. 65-140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
MoxnesH. (1988). The economy of the kingdom: Social conflict and economic relations in Luke’s Gospel. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
75.
MoxnesH. (1991). Patron-client relations and the new community in Luke-Acts. In NeyreyJ. H. (Ed.), The social world of Luke-Acts (pp. 241-268). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
76.
MundellJ. A. (2011, January). The Economy of Communion business and corporate social responsibility. In The Economy of Communion and the African Economic Vocation—Theory and best practice. Nairobi, Kenya: Catholic University of Eastern Africa.
77.
NagleB. D. (2006). The household as the foundation of Aristotle’s Polis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
79.
NeyreyJ. H.StewartE. C. (Eds.). (2008). The social world of the New Testament: Insights and models. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
80.
OakmanD. E. (1986). Jesus and the economic questions of his day. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
81.
PayneG. T.BrighamK.BrobergJ. C.MossT. W.ShortJ. C. (2011). Organizational virtue orientation and family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 257-285.
82.
PoggiG. (1965). A main theme of contemporary sociological analysis: Its achievements and limitations. British Journal of Sociology, 16, 283-294.
83.
PolanyiK. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
84.
PorterM. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York, NY: Free Press.
85.
PowellM. A. (1992). Salvation in Luke-Acts. Word & World, 12, 5-12.
86.
RawsonB. (Ed.). (2011). A companion to families in the Greek and Roman worlds. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
87.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110.
88.
ReedJ. L. (2007). The HarperCollins visual guide to the New Testament: What archeology reveals about the first Christians. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
89.
SallerR. P.ShawB. D. (1984). Tombstones and Roman family relations in the Principate: Civilians, soldiers, and slaves. Journal of Roman Studies, 74, 124-156.
90.
SantosF. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 335-351.
91.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.GersickK. E. (2012). 25 Years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25, 5-15.
92.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
93.
SimmonsJ. A. (2008). God in recent French phenomenology. Philosophy Compass, 3, 910-932.
94.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
95.
TroeltschE. (1931). The social teaching of the Christian churches. New York, NY: Macmillan.
96.
VallejoM. C. (2008). Is the culture of family firms really different? A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 261-279.
97.
Von KimakowitzE.PirsonM.SpitzeckH.DierksmeierC.AmannW. (Eds.). (2010). Humanistic management in practice. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
98.
Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2002). A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1011-1028.
99.
WeberM. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (ParsonsT. Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner’s.
100.
WisemanR.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1998). A behavioral model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23, 133-153.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
