This study examines the relationship between bonding and bridging ownership social capital (OSC) for a random sample of 679 privately held small and medium-sized firms. Results confirm the positive effects of bonding OSC (quality of relationships and shared vision) on bridging OSC (network mobilization) as well as two- and three-way moderator effects of family firm identity and ownership–management overlap. Moderator effects are more robust, however, for the shared vision indicator of bonding OSC. Implications for social capital theory, social and organizational identity theory, and family firm research and practice are discussed.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
3.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1327.
4.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007).The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.
5.
Berent-BraunM. M.UhlanerL. M. (2012a). Responsible ownership behaviors and financial performance in family owned businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19, 20-38.
6.
Berent-BraunM. M.UhlanerL. M. (2012b). Family governance practices and teambuilding: Paradox of the enterprising family. Small Business Economics Journal, 38, 103-119.
7.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
8.
BriefA. P.MotowidloS. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
9.
BurtR. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Network, 19, 355-373.
10.
CarrJ. C.ColeM. S.RingJ. K.BlettnerD. P. (2011). A measure of variations in internal social capital among family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1207-1227.
11.
CarrR.ParkerC. M.CastlemanT.MasonC. (2013). Factors affecting SME owner-managers’ willingness to share knowledge online in rural local business networks. Journal of Internet Commerce, 12, 307-331.
12.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-576.
13.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
14.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
15.
DawsonJ. F.RichterA. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917-926.
16.
De LemaD. G. P.DurendezA. (2007). Managerial behaviour of small and medium-sized family businesses: An empirical study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour Research, 13, 151-172.
17.
EddlestonK. (2011). The family as an internal and external resource of the firm: The importance of building family-firm identity. In SorensonR. L. (Ed.), Family business and social capital (pp. 186-197). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
18.
ElfringT.HulsinkW. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409-442.
19.
EllemersN. (2001). Social identity, commitment, and work behavior. In HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 101-114). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
20.
FlorinJ.LubatkinM.SchulzeW. (2003). A social capital model of high growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 374-384.
21.
GedajlovicE.HonigB.PayneG. T.WrightM. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 455-478.
22.
GordonI.HamiltonE.JackS. (2012). A study of a university-led entrepreneurship education programme for small business owner/managers. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24, 767-805.
23.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
24.
KumarN.SternL. W.AndersonJ. W. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1663-1651.
25.
LatanéB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
26.
LeanaC. R.Van BurenH. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 538-555.
27.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 22-51.
28.
LinN. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Aldine DeGruyter.
29.
LongR. G. (2011). Commentary: Social exchange in building, modeling, and managing family social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1229-1234.
30.
McFaydenM. A.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 735-746.
31.
MillerD.LeBreton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
32.
MorrisM. H.WilliamsR. J.NelD. (1996). Factors influencing family business succession. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 2, 68-81.
33.
MustakallioM. E.AutioE.ZahraS. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15, 205-222.
34.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
35.
O’BoyleE. H.Jr.PollackJ. M.RutherfordM. W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 1-18.
36.
OhH.LabiancaG.ChungM. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569-582.
37.
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. P. (2006). Organization citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. London, England: Sage.
38.
PayneT. G.MooreC.GriffisS. E.AutryC. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37, 491-520.
39.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.
40.
PreechanontP.LuT. (2013). A comparative study of small business owner-managers’ identity construction in B2B relationship marketing and business networking discourse in the UK and China. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 21, 495-532.
41.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
42.
SalvatoC.MelinL. (2008). Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 21, 259-276.
43.
SharmaP. (2008). Commentary: Familiness—Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 971-977.
44.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
45.
SorensonR. L.GoodpasterK. E.HedbergP. R.YuA. (2009). Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review, 22, 193-195.
46.
StephanU.UhlanerL. M. (2010). Performance-based vs. socially-supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1347-1364.
47.
SubramaniamM.YoundtM. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450-463.
48.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
49.
UhlanerL. M. (2005). The use of the Guttman Scale in development of a family orientation index for small-to-medium-sized firms. Family Business Review, 43, 41-56.
50.
UhlanerL. M.FlörenR. H.GeerlingsJ. R. (2007). Owner commitment and relational governance in the privately-held firm. Small Business Economics, 29, 275-293.
51.
UhlanerL.M.van StelA.DuplatV.ZhouH. (2013). Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth. Small Business Economics, 41, 581-607.
52.
VilasecaA. (2002). The shareholder role in the family business: Conflict of interests and objectives between nonemployed shareholders and top management team. Family Business Review, 15, 299-320.
53.
WestheadP.CowlingM. (1997). Performance contrasts between family and non-family unquoted companies in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 3, 30-52
54.
WestlundH.AdamF. (2010). Social capital and economic performance: A meta-analysis of 65 studies. European Planning Studies, 18, 893-919.
55.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.NeubaumD. O.DibrellC.CraigJ. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1035-1054.
56.
ZellwegerT.AstrachanJ. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21, 347-363.
57.
ZhengW. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us?International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 151-183.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
