AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
2.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209-237.
3.
AmoreM. D.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2011). How do managerial successions shape corporate financial policies in family firms?Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 1016-1027.
4.
BascleG. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research, Strategic Organization, 6, 285-327.
5.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Pérez-GonzálezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
6.
Blanco-MazagatosV.de Quevedo-PuenteE.CastrilloL. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 20, 199-213.
7.
CraigJ. (2010). Desk rejection: How to avoid being hit by a returning boomerang. Family Business Review, 23, 306-309.
8.
CrociE.DoukasJ.GonencH. (2011). Family control and financing decisions. European Financial Management, 17, 860-897.
9.
FernandoG. D.SchneibleR. A.Jr.SuhS.-H. (2013). Family firms and institutional investors. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486513481474
10.
GeletkanyczM.TepperB. (2012). Publishing in AMJ—part 6: Discussing the implications. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 256-260.
11.
GonzalezM.GuzmanA.PomboC.TrujilloM.-A. (2014). Family involvement and dividend policy in closely held firms. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486514538448
12.
GrantA. M.PollockT. G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 873-879.
13.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.LybaertN. (2013). Entrepreneurial risk-taking of private family firms: The influence of a non-family CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26, 161-179.
14.
JainB.ShaoY. (2014). Family involvement and post-IPO investment policy. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486514538044
15.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
16.
KoroppC.KellermannsF. W.GrichnikD.StanleyL. (2014). Financial decision making in family firms: An adaptation of the theory of planned behavior. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486514522483
17.
LarckerD.RusticusT. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 186-205.
18.
LiM. (2012). Using the propensity score method to estimate causal effects: A review and practical guide. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 188-226.
19.
LienY.-C.LiS. (2013). Professionalization of family business and performance effect. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486513482971
20.
MichielsA.VoordeckersW.LybaertN.SteijversT. (2013). CEO compensation in private family firms: Pay-for-performance sensitivity and the moderating role of ownership and management conditions. Family Business Review, 26, 140-160.
21.
MillerD. (2007). Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organization, 5, 177-184.
22.
MillerD. (2008). Stranger in strange land: a brief journey into the realm of empirical corporate finance. Strategic Organization, 6, 329-339.
23.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR.CannellaA. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
24.
MollyV.LaverenE.DeloofM. (2010). Family business succession and its impact on financial performance. Family Business Review, 23, 131-147.
25.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 367-382.
26.
MorckR.YeungB. (2004). Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 391-409.
27.
MurrayM. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 111-132.
28.
Pérez-GonzálezF. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96, 1559-1588.
29.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110.
30.
ReuberR. (2010). Strengthening your literature review. Family Business Review, 23, 105-108.
31.
ReuberR.SharmaP. (2013). The anatomy of a paper. Family Business Review, 26, 113-120.
32.
SalvatoC.AldrichH. E. (2012). “That’s interesting!” in family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 125-135.
33.
SchmidT. (2013). Control considerations, creditor monitoring, and the capital structure of family firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 257-272.
34.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
35.
ShortJ. (2012). Defending family business research: The role of authors as defense attorneys. Family Business Review, 25, 367-373.
36.
ZellwegerT.DehlenT. (2012). Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25, 280-297.
37.
ZhangY.ShawJ. R. (2012). Publishing in AMJ—part 5: Crafting the methods and results. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 8-12.