We extend prior work on proactiveness in family firms by examining the relationship between firm age and proactiveness. Specifically, we propose an S-shaped effect of aging of family firms on proactiveness. Additionally, we provide a contingency perspective by considering the moderating role of the dispersion of managerial control among family members. Using a sample of Swiss family firms, we find that proactiveness first declines, then increases, and finally decreases again as the family firm ages, and that this relationship is steeper when the managerial control is dispersed among multiple family members.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-106.
2.
BakerD. D.CullenJ. B. (1993). Administrative reorganization and configurational context: The contingent effects of age, size, and change in size. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1251-1277.
3.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.BarberoJ. L. (2010). A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23, 27-44.
4.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
5.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
6.
ColliA. (2012). Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history. Family Business Review, 25, 243-257.
7.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 355-362.
8.
CovinJ. G.LumpkinG. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 855-872.
9.
CruzC.NordqvistM. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38, 33-49.
10.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
11.
DavisJ. H.BertoldiB.QuagliaR. (2012, March28). The Agnellis and Fiat: Family business governance in a crisis. Harvard Business School Case Collection 812-828. Allston, MA: Harvard Business School.
12.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (in press). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52.
13.
De TienneD.ChiricoF. (2013). Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1297–1318.
14.
Discua CruzA.HoworthC.HamiltonE. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 17-46.
15.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545-565.
16.
GedajlovicE.LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 899-912.
17.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
HamiltonL. C. (2006). Statistics with Stata. Belmont, CA: Cengage.
19.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
20.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
21.
HoyF.SharmaP. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
22.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.LybaertN. (2012). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: The influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26, 161-179.
23.
HuyghebaertN.Van de GuchtL. M. (2004). Incumbent strategic behavior in financial markets and the exit of entrepreneurial start-ups. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 669-688.
24.
JamesH. S. (1999). What can the family contribute to business? Examining contractual relationships. Family Business Review, 12, 61-71.
25.
JansenJ. J. P.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?Academy of Management Journal, 48, 999-1015.
26.
KellyL. M.AthanassiouN.CrittendenW. F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42.
27.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6). doi: 10.1111/etap.12065
28.
Le Breton-MillerI. L.MillerD. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1169-1191.
29.
LitzR. A. (1997). The family firm’s exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void; addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(3), 55-71.
30.
LumpkinG. T.DessG. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451.
31.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791.
32.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 51-78.
33.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 367-382.
34.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjöbergK.WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20, 33-47.
35.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
36.
NordqvistM.HabbershonT. G.MelinL. (2008). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring EO in family firms. In LandströmH.CrijnsH.MelinL. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research (pp. 93-116). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
37.
NordqvistM.MelinL. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3, 211-239.
38.
PenroseE. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
40.
SchumpeterJ. (1954). History of economic analysis (Vol. 33). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
SharmaP.SalvatoC. (2011). Commentary: Exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1199-1205.
42.
ShortJ. C.PayneG.BrighamK. H.LumpkinG.BrobergJ. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22, 9-24.
43.
SimonM.HoughtonS. M. (2003). The relationship among biases, misperceptions, and the introduction of pioneering products: Examining differences in venture decision contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 105-124.
44.
SuE.DouJ. (2013). How does knowledge sharing among advisors from different disciplines affect the quality of the services provided to the family business client? An investigation from the family business advisor’s perspective. Family Business Review, 26, 256-270.
45.
TiwanaA.McleanE. R. (2005). Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 13-43.
46.
TushmanM. L.RomanelliE. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
47.
VenkatramanN. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35, 942-962.
48.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19, 301-316.
49.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203-216.
50.
ZellwegerT. M.SiegerP. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics, 38, 67-84.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
