AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
2.
AndersonR.ReebD. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
3.
ArregleJ.-L.HittM. A.SirmonD.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.
4.
BarleyS. (2006). When I write my manuscript: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16-20.
5.
BartunekJ. M. (2002). A dream for the academy [Presidential address]. Academy of Management Review, 28, 198-203.
6.
BartunekJ. M.RynesS.IrelandR. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?Academy of Management Journal, 49, 9-15.
7.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Pérez-GonzálezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
8.
BurkartM.PanunziF.ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167-2202.
9.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
10.
ChuaJ.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19-39.
11.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 355-362.
12.
CraigJ. B. (2010). Desk rejection: How to avoid being hit by a returning boomerang. Family Business Review, 23, 306-309.
13.
CraigJ. B.SalvatoC. (2012). The distinctiveness, design, and direction of family business research: Insights from management luminaries. Family Business Review, 25, 109-116.
14.
DaftR. L. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 8, 539-546.
15.
DasH.LongB. S. (2010). What makes management research interesting? An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 127-144.
16.
DavisM. (1971). “That’s interesting!” Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
18.
DeNisiA. S. (1994). Is relevant research irrelevant? On evaluating the contribution of research to management practice. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 145-159.
19.
DuttonJ.DukerichJ. (2006). The relational foundation of research: An underappreciated dimension of interesting research. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 21-26.
20.
FongC. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1016-1030.
21.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/014920631142999010.1177/0149206311429990
22.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
23.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25
24.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87-108.
25.
JudgeT. A.CableD. M.ColbertA. E.RynesS. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited: Article, author or journal?Academy of Management Journal, 50, 491-506.
26.
KayeK. (1996). When the family business is a sickness. Family Business Review, 9, 347-368.
27.
KleinS. B.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-339.
28.
LambrechtJ.LievensJ. (2008). Pruning the family tree: An unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony. Family Business Review, 21, 295-313.
29.
LansbergI.GersickK. (1993). Editor’s notes: The first six volumes. Family Business Review, 6, 349-350.
30.
LitzR. A.PearsonA. W.LitchfieldS. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25, 16-32.
31.
PearsonA. W.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up?Family Business Review, 24, 287-291.
32.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110.
33.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.
34.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
35.
SharmaP. (2009). Embracing change while preserving the core. Family Business Review, 22, 6-8.
36.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.GersickK. (2012). 25 years of Family Business Review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25, 5-15.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
39.
SmithD. C. (2003). The importance and challenges of being interesting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 319-322.
40.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
41.
VoronovM.VinceR. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 58-81.
42.
VossG. (2003). Formulating interesting research questions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 356-359.
43.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.SorensonR. L.BrighamK. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 35-57.
44.
ZahraS. A.SharmaP. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
