The authors define family–business embeddedness as confluence of values and objectives stemming from the overlapping institutional contexts—family, business, and symbolic—in the family firm. Hence, the family–business embeddedness perspective investigates the effect of integrating divergent institutional values and objectives, economic and noneconomic, on family firm’s performance. The authors contend that family–business embeddedness and work centrality will magnify family employees’ job satisfaction, whereas superior job alternatives will produce an opposite effect. In turn, job satisfaction will be negatively related to family employees’ turnover intentions. A survey of 111 family employees from 70 family firms in the United States supported the hypotheses.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
3.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommending two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
4.
AronoffC.WardJ. (2001). Family business values: How to assure a legacy of continuity and success (2nd ed.). Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise.
5.
BolesJ. (1996). Influences of work-family conflict on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and quitting intentions among business owners: The case of family-operated business. Family Business Review, 9, 61-74.
6.
BoyarS. L.MaertzC. P.Jr.PearsonA. W.KeoughS. (2003). Work-family conflict: A model of linkages between work and family domain variables and turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15, 175-191.
7.
ChenG.PloyhartR. E.ThomasH.AndersenN.BlieseP. D. (2011). The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 159-181.
8.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2010). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1-27.
9.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575.
10.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2003). An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 441-448.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2011). Resilience of family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1107-1119.
12.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19-39.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P. (2003). Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27, 331-338.
14.
CruzC.JustoR.CastroJ. O. D. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs’ performance?Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 62-76.
15.
EnsleyM. D.PearsonA. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 267-284.
16.
EnsleyM. D.PearsonA. W.SardeshmukhS. R. (2007). The negative consequences of pay dispersion in family and non-family top management teams: An exploratory analysis of new venture, high-growth firms. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1039-1047.
17.
FelpsW.MitchellT. R.HermanD. R.LeeT. W.HoltomB. C.HarmanW. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 545-561.
18.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
20.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957-969.
21.
GerhartB. (1990). Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 467-476.
22.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK.Nuñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
23.
GranovetterM. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
24.
GranovetterM. S. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50.
25.
GriffethR. W.HomP. W.GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
26.
HagedoornJ. (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 670-680.
27.
HarmanH. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HarrisR. D.ReidR. S.McAdamR. (2004). Consultation and communication in family businesses in Great Britain. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1424-1444.
29.
HinkinT. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.
30.
HinkinT. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121.
31.
HirschfieldR. R.FieldH. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 789-800.
32.
HoffmanB. J.BynumB. H.PiccoloR. F.SuttonA. W. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 779-796.
33.
HuL.T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6, 1-55.
34.
KanungoR. N. (1982). Work alienation. New York, NY: Praeger.
35.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 209-228.
36.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.
37.
KellowayE. K.GottliebB. H.BarhamL. (1999). The source, nature, and direction of work and family conflict: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 337-346.
38.
KrippnerG. R.AlvarezA. S. (2007). Embeddedness and the intellectual projects of economic sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 219-240.
39.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
40.
LansbergI. S. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organization Dynamics, 12, 39-46.
41.
LeeJ. (2006). Impact of family relationships on attitudes of the second generation in family business. Family Business Review, 29, 175-191.
42.
LeeT. H.GerhartB.WellerI.TrevorC. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651-671.
43.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2006). When and why do family businesses outperform? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30, 731-746.
44.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1169-1191.
45.
LodahlT. M.KejnerM. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
46.
MannheimB.SchiffrinM. (1984). Family structure, job characteristics, rewards and strains as related to work-role centrality of employed and self-employed professional women with children. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5(2), 83-101.
47.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
48.
MemiliE.BarnettT. (2008). Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of person-organization fit and voluntary turnover in family firms. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.
49.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
50.
MeyerJ. P.HerscovitchL. (2001). Toward a general model of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
51.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.ChrismanJ. J.SpenceL. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 235-255.
52.
MitchellT. R.HoltomB. C.LeeT. W.SablynskiC. J.ErezM. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102-21.
53.
MoranP. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1129-1151.
54.
MOW International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. London, England: Academic Press.
55.
O’BoyleE. H.RutherfordM. W.PollackJ. M. (2010). Examining the relation between ethical focus and financial performance in family firms: An exploratory study. Family Business Review23, 310-326.
56.
ParadaM. J.NordqvistM.GimenoA. (2010). Institutionalizing the family business: The role of professional associations in fostering a change of values. Family Business Review, 23, 355-372.
57.
ParboteeahK. P.CullenJ. B. (2003). Social institutions and work centrality: Explorations beyond national culture. Organization Science, 14, 137-148.
58.
ParboteeahK. P.CullenJ. B.LimL. (2004). Formal volunteering: A cross-national test. Journal of World Business, 39, 431-441.
59.
PaullayI. M.AlligerG. M.Stone-RomeroE. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 224-228.
60.
PavlouP. A.LiangH.XueY. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal–agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105-136.
61.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.
62.
PearsonA. W.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up?Family Business Review, 24, 287-291.
63.
PetersL.JackofskyE.SalterJ. (1981). Predicting turnover: A comparison of part-time and full-time employees. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 89-98.
64.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
65.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ.ProbstG.TushmanM. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685-695.
66.
ReidR.MorrowT.KellyB.McCartanP. (2002). People management in SMEs: An analysis of human resource strategies in family and non-family business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9, 245-239.
67.
RousseauD. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
RowleyT.BehrensD.KrackhardtU. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 369-386.
69.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review17, 1-36.
70.
SharmaP.IrvingG. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 13-33.
71.
ShepherdD.HaynieJ. M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1243-1262.
72.
SteelR. P.GriffethR. W. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: A methodological or conceptual artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846-854.
73.
SteelR. P.LounsburyJ. W. (2009). Turnover process models: Review and synthesis of a conceptual literature. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 271-282.
74.
SteierL. P. (2001a). Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14, 259-276.
75.
SteierL. P. (2001b). Family firms, plural forms of governance and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353-367.
76.
SteierL. P. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597-618.
77.
SteierL. P.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2009). Embeddedness perspectives of economic action within family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1157-1167.
78.
TrevorC. O. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 621-638.
79.
VillanuevaJ.SapienzaH. J. (2009). Goal tolerance, outside investors, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1193-1199.
80.
WatsonG. W.PapamarcosS. D.TeagueB. T. (2004). Exploring the dynamics of business values: A self-affirmation perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 337-346.
81.
WryT.LounsburyM.GlynnM. A. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22, 449-463.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
