AlloucheJ.AmannB.JaussadJ.KurishinaT. (2008). The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus nonfamily businesses in Japan: A matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review, 21, 315-329.
2.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S & P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
3.
AstrachanJ. H. (2003). The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 567-572.
4.
AstrachanJ. H. (2008). Editor’s notes. Family Business Review, 9, 1-3.
5.
AstrachanJ. H.ShankerM. (2003). Family businesses’ contributions to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16, 211-219.
6.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Perez-GonzalesF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.
7.
BirdB.WelschH.AstrachanJ. H.PistruiD. (2002). Family business research: The evolution of an academic field. Family Business Review, 15, 337-350.
8.
BjörnbergÅ.NicholsonN. (2007). The family climate scales: Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20, 229-246.
9.
CasillasJ.AcedoF. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20, 141-162.
10.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
11.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-575.
12.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
13.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
14.
CraigJ.SalvatoC. (2012). The distinctiveness, design, and direction of family business research: Insights from management luminaries. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651142968210.1177/0894486511429682
15.
DavisJ. A. (1982). The influence of life-stage on father–son work relationships in family companies (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
16.
DawsonA.HjorthD. (2012). Advancing family business research through narrative analysis. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651142148710.1177/0894486511421487
17.
DyerW. G.Jr. (2009). Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22, 216-219.
18.
DyerW. G.Jr.SanchezM. (1998). Current state of family business theory and practice as reflected in Family Business Review 1988-1997. Family Business Review, 11, 287-295.
19.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.McCollom-HamptonM.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20.
GersickK. E.FeliuN. (in press). Governing the family enterprise: Practices, performance, and research. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of family business. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.DeCastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservations in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
22.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.Nuňez-NickelM.GutierrezL. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 226-237.
23.
HandlerW. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2, 257-276.
24.
HeckR. K. Z.TrentE. (1999). The prevalence of family business from a household sample. Family Business Review, 12, 209-224.
25.
HoltD. T.RutherfordM. W.KuratkoD. F. (2010). Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23, 76-88.
26.
HoyF. (2012). Review of three influential books by Ward (1987), Gersick et al (1997), and Miller & Le-Breton Miller (2005). Family Business Review, 25(1), 117-120.
27.
International Family Enterprise Research Academy. (2003). Family firms dominate. Family Business Review, 16, 235-239.
28.
JamesA. E.JenningsJ. E.BreitkreuzR. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Re-bridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87-108.
29.
KleinS.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-339.
30.
LansbergI. (2001).The reflective practitioner: A tribute to Dick Beckhard. Family Business Review, 14, 3-10.
31.
LansbergI.GersickK. (1993). Editor’s notes: The first six volumes. Family Business Review, 6, 349-350.
32.
LansbergI.PerrowE. L.RogolskyS. (1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1, 1-8.
33.
LaPortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
34.
LeeK. S.LimG. H.LimW. S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28, 657-666.
35.
LewinK. (1951). Formalization and progress in psychology. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical parts by Kurt Lewin (pp. 1-29). New York, NY: Harper. (Original work published 1940)
36.
LitzR. A. (1997). The family firm’s exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void, addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(3), 55-71.
37.
LitzR. A.PearsonA.LitchfieldS. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651141848910.1177/0894486511418489
38.
McKennyA.ShortJ. C.ZacharyM. A.PayneG. T. (2012). Assessing espoused goals in private family firms using content analysis. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651142042210.1177/0894486511420422
39.
MicelottaE. R.RaynardM. (2011). Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies of family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 197-216.
40.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
42.
MooresK. (2009). Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business families. Family Business Review, 22, 167-180.
43.
ParmentierM. (2011). When David met Victoria: Forging a strong family brand. Family Business Review, 24, 217-232.
44.
PearsonA. W.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up?Family Business Review, 24, 287-291.
45.
ReayT.WhettenD. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review, 24, 105-110.
46.
ReuberR.FischerE. (2011). Marketing (in) the family firm. Family Business Review, 24, 193-196.
47.
RogoffE. G.HeckR. K. Z. (2003). Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 559-566.
48.
SalvatoC.ChiricoF.SharmaP. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurial & Regional Development, 22, 321-348.
49.
SalvatoC.MinichilliA.PiccarretaR. (2012). Faster route to the CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency?Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651142755910.1177/0894486511427559
50.
SalvatoC.MooresK. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23, 193-215.
51.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
52.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21, 331-345.
53.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
54.
SharmaP. (2009). Embracing change while preserving the core. Family Business Review, 22, 6-8.
55.
SharmaP. (2010a). Advancing the 3Rs of family business scholarship: Rigor, relevance, reach. In StewartA.LumpkinG. T.KatzJ. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 12, pp. 383-400). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
56.
SharmaP. (2010b). 2009: A year in review. Family Business Review, 23, 1-4.
57.
SharmaP. (2011). 2010: A year in review. Family Business Review, 24, 1-4.
58.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1-35.
59.
SharmaP.HoyF.AstrachanJ. H.KoiranenM. (2007). The practice-driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1012-1021.
60.
SharmaP.NordqvistM. (2008). A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance. In TàpiesJ.WardJ. L (Eds.), Family values and value creation: The fostering of enduring values within family-owned businesses (pp. 71-101). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
SiegerP.ZellwegerT.NasonR.ClintonE. (2011). Portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms: A resource based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 327-351.
62.
SorensonR.BiermanL. (2009). Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review, 22, 193-195.
63.
StaffordK.DuncanK. A.DanesS.WinterM. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 197-208.
64.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a non-family business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
65.
van EssenM. V.CarneyM.GedajlovicE.HeugensP. P. M. A. R. (2011). Do U.S. publicly-listed family firms differ? Does it matter? A meta-analysis. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837517
66.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
67.
WestheadP.CowlingM. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodology rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31-56.
68.
WortmanM. S.Jr. (1994a). Theoretical foundations for familyowned businesses: A conceptual and research based paradigm. Family Business Review, 7, 3-27.
69.
WortmanM. S.Jr. (1994b). Envisioning the future. Family Business Review, 7, 1-2.
70.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.SorensonR. L.BrighamK. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 33-57.
71.
ZahraS.SharmaP. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
72.
ZellwegerT.NasonR.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651142353110.1177/0894486511423531
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.