For any team to function effectively, several basic elements need to be present. The extent to which these elements are present increases the chances of a successful team outcome. Since a family business can be viewed as a type of team, the literature on how to design effective teams is also relevant to business families. The primary objectives of this study are to identify the team design elements commonly referred to in the family business literature and to empirically test their influence on the effectiveness of South African sibling teams in family businesses. The empirical findings of this preliminary study show that physical resources, skills diversity, and strategic leadership are important determinants of sibling team success whereas role clarity and competence are not.
AdendorffC. M. (2004). The development of a cultural family business model of good governance for Greek family businesses in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
2.
AnconaD.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organizations Science, 3, 321-341.
3.
AronoffC. E.AstrachanJ. H.MendosaD. S.WardJ. L. (1997). Making sibling teams work: The next generation (Family Business Leadership Series). Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise.
4.
AstrachanJ. H. (2006). Editor’s notes. Family Business Review, 19, v-vi.
5.
BarachJ. A.GantiskyJ. B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8, 131-155.
6.
BarrickR. B.StewartG. L.NeubertM. J.MountM. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
7.
BrowneM.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230-391.
8.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
9.
CohenS. G.BaileyD. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop-floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
10.
ColeP. M.JohnsonK. (2007). An exploration of successful copreneurial relationships postdivorce. Family Business Review, 20, 185-198.
11.
CongerJ.KanungoR. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behaviour attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 439-452.
12.
CowieL. (2007). An investigation into the components impacting the effective functioning of management teams in small businesses (Unpublished honours treatise). Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
13.
DanesS. M.ZuikerV.KeanR.ArbuthnotJ. (1999). Predictors of family business tensions and goal achievement. Family Business Review, 12, 241-252.
14.
DoolenT. L.HackerM. E.Van AkenE. (2006). Managing organizational context for engineering team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 12(5/6), 138-154.
15.
DumasC.DupuisJ. P.RicherF.St.-CyrL. (1995). Factors that influence the next generation’s decision to take over the family farm. Family Business Review, 8, 99-120.
16.
DunnB. (1999). The family factor: The impact of family relationship dynamics on business-owning families during transitions. Family Business Review, 12, 41-60.
17.
EnsleyM. D.PearsonA. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency and consensus. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, May, 267-284.
18.
EybersC. (2010). Copreneurs in South African small and medium-sized family businesses (Unpublished master’s thesis). Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
19.
FarringtonS. M. (2009). Sibling partnerships in South African small and medium-sized family businesses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
20.
FlörenR. H. (2002). Crown princes in the clay. Assen, Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum.
21.
FriedmanS. D. (1991). Sibling relationships and intergenerational succession in family firms. Family Business Review, 4, 3-20.
22.
GageD.GromalaJ.KopfE. (2004). Successor partners: Gifting or transferring a business or real property to the next generation. ACTEC Journal, 30, 193-197.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.McCollom HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
25.
GladsteinD. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
26.
GoldbergS. D. (1996). Research note: Effective successors in family-owned businesses: significant elements. Family Business Review, 9, 185-197.
27.
GuzzoR. A.DicksonM. D. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
28.
HackmanJ. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
29.
HackmanJ. R.WaltonR. E. (1986). Leading groups in organisations. In GoodmanP. S. (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinJ. B.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
32.
HandlerW. C. (1991). Key interpersonal relationships of next-generation family members in family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 21-32.
33.
HienerthC.KesslerA. (2006). Measuring success in family businesses: The concept of configurational fit. Family Business Review, 19, 115-133.
34.
HittM. A.MillerC. C.ColellaA. (2006). Organisational behavior: A systematic approach. New York, NY: John Wiley.
35.
HofstrandD. (2000, October). Designing family business teams. Ag Decision Maker. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
36.
HoganR. (2007). Personality and the fate of organisations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
HowardL. W.FosterS. T.ShannonP. (2005). Leadership, perceived team climate and process improvement in municipal government. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22, 769-795.
38.
HyattD. E.RuddyT. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50, 553-585.
39.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
40.
IvancevichJ.KonopaskeI.MattesonM. (2005). Organisational behavior and management (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41.
JimenezR. M. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22, 53-64.
42.
KeenT. R. (2003). Creating effective and successful teams. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
43.
KozlowskiS. W. J.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
44.
LansbergI. (1999). Succeeding generations: Realising the dreams of families in business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
45.
LansbergI.AstrachanJ. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7, 39-59.
46.
LeanaC. R.Van BurenH. J. (1999). Organisational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 538-555.
47.
MaasG. (1999, July-August). Family businesses in South Africa: A development model. Paper presented at the SAESBA Conference, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
48.
MarshackK. J. (1993). Coentrepreneurial couples: A literature review on boundaries and transitions among copreneurs, Family Business Review, 6, 355-369.
49.
McGrathJ. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
50.
MeadeA. W.WatsonA. M.KroustalisS. M. (2007). Assessing common methods bias in organizational research. Paper presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, NY.
51.
MustakallioM.AutioE. (2001, October4-6). Effects of formal and social controls on strategic decision making in family firms. Paper presented at the Family Business Networld World Conference, Rome, Italy.
52.
NeltonS. (1996). Team playing is on the rise. Nation’s Business, 84(6).
53.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
54.
RingP. S.Van de VenA. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganisational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.
55.
RobertsM. C.StephenS.IlardiS. S. (2003). Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
56.
RutherfordM. W.MuseL. A.OswaldS. L. (2006). A new perspective on the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review, 19, 317-333.
57.
SantiagoA. L. (2000). Succession experiences in Philippine family businesses. Family Business Review, 13, 15-40.
58.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association (Vol. 1, pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
59.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In Von EyeA.CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications to developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
SharmaP. (1997). Determinants of the satisfaction of the primary stakeholders with the succession process in family firms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
61.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
62.
SharmaP.ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, May, 293-311.
63.
StewartG. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-55.
64.
Stewart-GrossB. L.GrossM. J. (2007). Sleeping with your business partner. Sterling, VA: Capital Books.
65.
UhlanerL. M. (2006). Business family as a team: Underlying force for sustained competitive advantage. In PoutziourisP.SmyrniosK.KleinS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on family business (pp. 125-145). Bodmin, Cornwall, England: Edward Elgar.
66.
VallejoM. C. (2009). Analytical models of leadership in family firms under transformational theoretical approach. Family Business Review, 22, 136-150.
67.
Van der MerweS. P.EllisS. (2007). An exploratory study of some of the determinants of harmonious family relationships in small and medium-sized family businesses. Management Dynamics, 16, 24-35.
68.
VenterE. (2003). The succession process in small and medium-sized family businesses in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
69.
WagemanR.HackmanJ. R.LehmanE. V. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 41, 373-398.
70.
WardJ. L. (1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10, 323-337.
71.
WardJ. L. (2004). Perpetuating the family business. 50 lessons learned from long-lasting successful families in business. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
ZahraS. A.SharmaP. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
74.
ZikmundW. G. (2003). Business research methods (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South Western Thomson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
