Family plays an important part in personal lives, career success, and organizational success. This study examines how type of businesses (family business vs. nonfamily business) moderates the relationships between family-to-work conflict (FWC) and job satisfaction and social networks. Results of a study on 158 Chinese business owners indicate that among nonfamily businesses, the relationship between owners’ FWC and job satisfaction is negative, whereas the relationship between their FWC and social networks is positive. Among family businesses, in comparison, owners’ FWC is not related to their job satisfaction and social networks. It is hoped that these findings will offer a springboard for future family business research.
AhlstromD.YoungM. N.ChanE. S.BrutonG. D. (2004). Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 263-285.
2.
AryeeS.FieldsD.LukV. (1999). A cross-cultural test of a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Management, 25, 491-511.
3.
AryeeS.LukV.LeungA.LoS. (1999). Role stressors, interrole conflict, and well-being: The moderating influence of spousal support and coping behaviors among employed parents in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 259-278.
4.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
5.
AuK.KwanH. K. (2005). Informal investors in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: Findings of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Hong Kong, SAR: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
6.
AuK.KwanH. K. (2009). Start-up capital and Chinese entrepreneurs: The role of family. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 889-908.
7.
BeehrT. A.DrexlerJ. A.Jr.FaulknerS. (1997). Working in small family businesses: Empirical comparisons to non-family businesses. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 297-312.
8.
BehsonS. J. (2002). Coping with family-to-work conflict: The role of informal work accommodations to family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 324-341.
9.
BriceW. D.RichardsonJ. (2009). Culture in family business: A two-country empirical investigation. European Business Review, 21, 246-262.
10.
BrutonG. D.LauC.-M. (2008). Asian management research: Status today and future outlook. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 636-659.
11.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsD.KleshJ. R. (1983). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. In SeashoreS. E. (Ed.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
CarneyM.GedajlovicE. (2002). The co-evolution of institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in the ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23, 1-29.
13.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
14.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
EkbladS. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309-321). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
EricksonB. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 217-251.
17.
FordM. T.HeinenB. A.LangkamerK. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57-80.
18.
GoldbergC. B. (2003). Who responds to surveys? Assessing the effects of nonresponse in cross-sectional dyadic research. Assessment, 10, 41-48.
19.
GrandeyA. A.CordeiroB. L.CrouterA. C. (2005). A longitudinal and multi-source test of the work-family conflict and job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 305-323.
20.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellN. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88.
21.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS. (1986). A work-nonwork interactive perspective of stress and its consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8, 37-60.
22.
GutekB. A.SearleS.KlepaL. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.
23.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1134-1145.
24.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.WheelerA. R. (2007). The costs and benefits of working with those you love: A demand/resource perspective on working with family. In PerrewéP. L.GansterD. C. (Eds.), Exploring the work and non-work interface (pp. 115-163). Oxford, England: Elsevier JAI Press.
25.
HammerL. B.NealM. B.NewsomJ. T.BrockwoodK. J.ColtonC. L. (2005). A longitudinal study of the effects of dual-earner couples’ utilization of family-friendly workplace supports on work and family outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 799-810.
26.
HarzingA.-W. (1997). Response rates in international mail surveys: Results of a 22-country study. International Business Review, 6, 641-665.
27.
HaynesG. W.WalkerR.RoweB. R.HongG.-S. (1999). The intermingling of business and family finances in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 225-239.
28.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
29.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337-369.
30.
HooblerJ. M.WayneS. J.LemmonG. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 939-957.
31.
HouseJ. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
HoyF.VerserT. G. (1994). Emerging business, emerging field: Entrepreneurship and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 9-23.
33.
JenningsJ. E.McDougaldM. S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32, 747-760.
34.
KarofskyP.MillenR.YilmazM. R.SmyrniosK. X.TanewskiG. A.RomanoC. A. (2001). Work-family conflict and emotional well-being in American family businesses. Family Business Review, 14, 313-324.
35.
LauV. P.ShafferM. A. (2006, December). Entrepreneurial capital theory of career success: A social learning perspective. Paper presented at the Fifth Asia Academy of Management Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
36.
LauV. P.ShafferM. A.AuK. (2007). Entrepreneurial career success from a Chinese perspective: Conceptualization, operationalization, and validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 126-146.
37.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
38.
LinN. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Aldine de Grupyter.
39.
LitzR. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meeting, 100-105.
40.
LobelS. A. (1991). Allocation of investment in work and family roles: Alternative theories and implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 16, 507-521.
41.
Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.ViswesvaranC. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 215-232.
42.
NealM. B.HammerL. B. (2009). Dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation: Effects of coping strategies over time. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 205-234.
43.
NeubauerF.LankA. G. (1998). The family business: Its governance for sustainability. London, England: Macmillan.
44.
NgT. W. H.EbyL. T.SorensenK. L.FeldmanD. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
45.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2008). Long work hours: A social identity perspective on meta-analysis data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 853-880.
46.
ParasuramanS.GreenhausJ. H.GranroseC. S. (1992). Role stressors, social support, and well-being among two-career couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 339-356.
47.
ParasuramanS.PurohitY. S.GodshalkV. M.BeutellN. J. (1996). Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 275-300.
48.
ParasuramanS.SimmersC. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: A comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 551-568.
49.
PengM. W. (1997). Firm growth in transitional economies: Three longitudinal cases from China, 1989-96. Organization Studies, 18, 385-413.
50.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
51.
RogelbergS. G.StantonJ. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 195-209.
52.
RomeroA. J.RobinsonT. N.HaydelK. F.MendozaF.KillenJ. D. (2004). Associations among familism, language preference, and education in Mexican-American mothers and their children. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 34-40.
53.
RothausenT. J. (2009). Management work-family research and work-family fit: Implications for building family capital in family business. Family Business Review, 22, 220-234.
54.
RothbardN. P.EdwardsJ. R. (2003). Investment in work and family roles: A test of identity and utilitarian motives. Personnel Psychology, 56, 699-730.
55.
SchalmR. L.KellowayE. K. (2001). The relationship between response rate and effect size in occupational health psychology research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 160-163.
SimsekZ.HeaveyC. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge-based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small-to medium-sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 81-100.
58.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
59.
SmyrniosK. X.RomanoC. A.TanewskiG. A.KarofskyP. I.MillenR.YilmazM. R. (2003). Work-family conflict: A study of American and Australian family businesses. Family Business Review, 16, 35-51.
60.
SteierL. (2001). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353-367.
61.
SteierL. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597-618.
62.
SundaramurthyC.KreinerG. E. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 415-436.
63.
ThomasH.AuK.LeungL.SuenB.YipS.LoR. (2007). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Hong Kong 2007. Hong Kong SAR: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
64.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
65.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2010). Family control of firms and industries. Financial Management, 39, 863-904.
66.
WittL. A.CarlsonD. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 343-357.
67.
YangC.-F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role family in contemporary China mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In SinhaD.KaoH. S. R. (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives (pp. 93-123). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
