Understanding how private family firms gauge performance is of great interest to family business scholars. Unfortunately, finding comparable data to understand differences in the performance of such firms is challenging. This study draws from the organizational identity literature to show how private family firms communicate different goals in publicly available organizational narratives. The authors illustrate a process using content analysis that allows family business scholars to create a comparative data set that captures both normative and utilitarian goals using website and press release narratives from a sample of Australian firms.
AlbertS.WhettenD. (1985). Organizational identity. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
ArgadoñaA. (1999). Sharing out in alliances: Trust and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 217-228.
3.
AshcroftL. (2001). PR, marketing and the Internet: Implications for information professionals. Library Management, 22(1/2), 68-74.
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
5.
AstrachanJ. H.KolenkoT. A. (1994). A neglected factor in explaining family business success: Human resources practices. Family Business Review, 7, 251-262.
6.
AstrachanJ. H.McMillanK. S. (2003). Conflict and communication in the family business. Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise.
7.
BarberJ. D. (1992). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the White House (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BarneyJ. B.BundesonJ. S.ForemanP. O.GustafsonL. T.HuffA. S.MartinsL. L.. . . StimpertL. (1998). A strategy conversation on the topic of organizational identity. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 99-168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
BascoR.Pérez RodriguezM. J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically: Evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22, 82-95.
10.
BettisR. (1991). Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 2, 315-319.
11.
BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C.MeindlJ. R. (2004). Charting the language of leadership: A methodological investigation of President Bush and the crisis of 9/11. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 562-574.
12.
BlockJ. (2010). Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23, 109-130.
13.
BolinoM. C.KacmarK. M.TurnleyW. H.GilstrapJ. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 1080-1109.
BrownJ. D.MarshallM. A. (2001). Great expectations: Optimism and pessimism in achievement settings. In ChangE. C. (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 239-255). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
CarlockR. S.WardJ. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.
18.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 467-472.
19.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11, 19-34.
20.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-576.
21.
ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChanK. C.LianoK. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
22.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
23.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (2003). Succession and non-succession concerns of family firms and agency relationships with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89-107.
24.
CraigJ.MooresK. (2005). Balanced scorecards to drive the strategic planning of family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 105-122.
25.
CraneA. (2000). Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21, 673-696.
DessG. G.RobinsonR. B.Jr. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265-273.
28.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
29.
DyerW. G.Jr.WhettenD. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 785-802.
30.
EldsonR.IyerS. (1999). Creating value and retention through employee development: The Sun Microsystems experience. Human Resource Planning, 22(2), 39-47.
31.
EtzioniA. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York, NY: Crown.
32.
Feito-RuizI.Menéndez-RequejoS. (2010). Family firm mergers and acquisitions in different legal environments. Family Business Review, 23, 60-75.
ForemanP.WhettenD. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13, 618-635.
35.
FreemanE. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
36.
FroehlichR.RüdigerB. (2006). Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 18-25.
37.
GlassopL. (2009). Australia’s top 100 private family firms. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
38.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
39.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.MakriM.Larraza KintanaM. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 223-252.
40.
GranataD.ChiricoF. (2010). Measures of value in acquisitions: Family versus nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 23, 341-354.
41.
GulbrandsenT. (2005). Flexibility in Norwegian family-owned enterprises. Family Business Review, 18, 57-76.
42.
HartR. P. (2000). DICTION 5.0: The text-analysis program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
HartR. P. (2001). Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In WestM. D. (Ed.), Theory, method, and practice in computer content analysis (pp. 43-60). New York, NY: Springer.
44.
HenryE. (2006). Market reaction to verbal components of earnings press releases: Event study using a predictive algorithm. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 3, 1-19.
45.
HmieleskiK. M.BaronR. A. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 473-488.
46.
IsabellaL. A.WaddockS. A. (1994). Top management team certainty: Environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, 20, 835-858.
47.
JoseA.LeeS.-M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 307-321.
48.
JunM.CaiS. (2001). The key determinants of Internet banking service quality: A content analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19, 276-291.
49.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
LamertzK.HeugensP. P. M. A. R.CalmetL. (2005). The configuration of organizational images among firms in the Canadian beer brewing industry. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 817-843.
51.
LansbergI. S. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 39-46.
52.
LeeJ. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19, 103-114.
53.
LubatkinM. HLingY.SchulzeW. S. (2003, August). Explaining agency problems in family firms using behavioral economics and justice theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
54.
McConaughyD. L.PhillipsG. M. (1999). Founders versus descendants: The profitability, efficiency, growth characteristics and financing in large, public, founding-family-controlled firms. Family Business Review, 12, 123-131.
55.
MicelottaE. R.RaynardM. (2011). Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies in family firms. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651140732110.1177/0894486511407321
56.
MorrisM. H.WilliamsR. O.AllenJ. A.AvilaR. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385-401.
57.
MossT. W.ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 805-830. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x
58.
MurphyD. (2005). Understanding the complexities of private family firms: An empirical examination. Family Business Review, 18, 123-133.
59.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjöbergK.WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family businesses. Family Business Review, 20, 33-47.
60.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
O’GormanC.DoranR. (1999). Mission statements in small and medium-sized businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 59-66.
62.
OlsonP. D.ZuikerV. S.DanesS. M.StaffordK.HeckR. K. Z.DuncanK. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639-666.
63.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
64.
PalmerT. B.ShortJ. C. (2008). Mission statements in U.S. colleges of business: An empirical examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 454-470.
65.
ParmentierM.-A. (2011). When David met Victoria: Forging a strong family brand. Family Business Review, 23, 217-232. doi:10.1177/089448651140841510.1177/0894486511408415
66.
PearceJ. A.DavidF. (1987). Corporate mission statements: The bottom line. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 109-116.
67.
PerrowC. (1961). The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 26, 854-866.
68.
PerrowC. (1968). Organizational goals. In SillsD. L.MertonR. K. (Eds). International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 305-361), New York, NY: Macmillan.
69.
RichardP. J.DevinneyG. S.YipG. S.JohnsonG. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718-804.
70.
RogersR. K.DillardJ.YuthasK. (2005). The accounting profession: Substantive change and/or image management. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1-3), 159-176.
71.
RothK.RicksD. A. (1994). Goal configuration in a global industry context. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 103-120.
72.
SalvatoC.MooresK. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23, 193-215.
73.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
74.
SharmaP. (2010). Editor’s note: 2009—A year in Review [Editorial]. Family Business Review, 23, 5-8.
75.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1-36.
76.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.PabloA. L.ChuaJ. H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 17-35.
77.
ShortJ. C.BrobergJ. C.CogliserC. C.BrighamK. H. (2010). Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA): An illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 320-347.
78.
ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.PalmerT. B. (2002). The role of sampling in strategic management research on performance: A two-study analysis. Journal of Management, 28, 363-385.
79.
ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.PalmerT. B.HultG. T. M. (2007). Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 147-167.
80.
ShortJ. C.PalmerT. B. (2003). Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 209-224.
81.
ShortJ. C.PalmerT. B. (2008). The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 727-752.
82.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.BrighamK.LumpkinG. T.BrobergC. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22, 9-24.
83.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.KetchenD. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34, 1053-1079.
84.
SorensonR. L. (1999). Conflict management strategies used by successful family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 325-339.
85.
SorensonR. L.GoodpasterK. E.HedbergP. R.YuA. (2009). The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance: An exploratory test. Family Business Review, 22, 239-253.
86.
StockmansA.LybaertN.VoordeckersW. (2010). Socioeconomic wealth and earnings management in private family firms. Family Business Review, 23, 280-294.
87.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5, 43-62.
88.
TompkinsR. (2010). The organizational identity of a family business: The role of hybrid identity in organizational events (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). George Washington University, Washington, DC.
89.
TuggleC. S.SchnatterlyK.JohnsonR. A. (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 550-571.
90.
VenkatramanN.RamanujamV. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 801-814.
91.
WalkerH. J.FieldH. S.GilesW. F.BernerthJ. B.ShortJ. C. (2011). So what do you think of the organization? A contextual priming explanation for recruitment Web site characteristics as antecedents of job seekers’ organizational image perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 165-178. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.00410.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.004
92.
WallT. D.MichieJ.PattersonM.WoodS. J.SheehanM.CleggC. W.WestM. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57, 95-118.
93.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for your continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
94.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
95.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19, 301-316.
96.
ZacharyM. A.McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.DavisK. M.WuD. (2011). Franchise branding: An organizational identity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0252-710.1007/s11747-011-0252-7
97.
ZacharyM. A.McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.PayneG. T. (2011). Family business and market orientation: Construct validation and comparative analysis. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089448651039687110.1177/0894486510396871
98.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203-216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
